RE: Ferrari FF: PH Fleet

RE: Ferrari FF: PH Fleet

Author
Discussion

suffolk009

5,417 posts

166 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
So when there's a PH article about a new lightweight sports car, why do the forums light up with people saying that for the same money you can buy a s/h Boxster or an Elise?

CampDavid

9,145 posts

199 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
suffolk009 said:
So when there's a PH article about a new lightweight sports car, why do the forums light up with people saying that for the same money you can buy a s/h Boxster or an Elise?
Normally the discussion is on how you could OWN AN MX5 outright

suffolk009

5,417 posts

166 months

Tuesday 22nd July 2014
quotequote all
CampDavid said:
Normally the discussion is on how you could OWN AN MX5 outright
I already do.

Reardy Mister

13,757 posts

223 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Giving 1500 per month to Ferrari Financial Services.

FFS.

Genius.

greygoose

8,265 posts

196 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I sometimes wonder if some posters actually like cars at all or just spend their time compiling spreadsheets, as he says the FF had a sense of occasion every time he started it and he justified the expense to himself, there is more to life than balance sheets and I enjoyed the insight into running such an exotic car.

jhoneyball

1,764 posts

277 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
EricE said:
JPJPJP said:
At retail, the depreciation has been glacial
Wait so did I get this right?
The car lost £120000 from new to 6000 miles and £10000 from 6000 to 10000 miles? How does that make sense? confused
A 250k car has 40k-ish of VAT for starters. So the car itself is worth only max of 190k as soon as you drive it off the forecourt, taking into account a reasonable dealer restocking/selling fee.

A 250k isnt a 250k car. Its a 210k car with 40k of vat. The first owner pays the vat. Subsequent owners dont. Blame HMRC.

priley

504 posts

189 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I'd guess that a lot of those making comments regarding absurdity of spending money this way could actually afford to do something similar, they (or perhaps their wives) simply choose not to. Instead they opt for bigger houses, nicer holidays, bigger pensions and possibly two nearly new daily drivers depreciating on the drive. Me, I bought a 612. You can keep the other stuff and we're all a long time dead.

Tim16V

419 posts

183 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
I think you've done very well with this.

Bought it right at the initial depreciation 'sweet spot' and whilst you've done £10k dealer margin in depreciation (plus monthly payments of course), you've had a stonking 6,000 miles out of it under full warranty!

It would be possible too loose at least £5k or maybe much more on a £30k mainstream car (before monthly payments are taken in to account).

ZesPak

24,432 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Redefining Man Maths as he goes, pretty epic CH!

Although I'm a long way off of the prospect of running a 300k car, I do get the "punch above your weight" in terms of cars just by man maths.
I think most on here do it, justifying an Elise or SL over a new Audi A3 in resale grey. CH just does it on another level, justifying this car over a 911 Turbo (also, resale grey).

What we all have to consider though, and CH probably knows this just as much or better than the rest of us, a 300k car will have the running costs of a 300k car. Doesn't matter if it "only" cost you 150k.

Personally, I did the same with an SLK for the wife. Through my man maths it's cheaper than a new VW Polo. But it isn't, of course. And I couldn't care less.

Ved

3,825 posts

176 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Good work. Bought a car he wanted for a while, had a great time in it and could more than cope financially owning it.

Anyone not seeing that first is just jealous.

On to the next one, I say.

DanielSan

18,803 posts

168 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Ved said:
Good work. Bought a car he wanted for a while, had a great time in it and could more than cope financially owning it.

Anyone not seeing that first is just jealous.

On to the next one, I say.
This. Whether a car is bought finance or cash, if you want it and can afford it then the bigger fools are the ones not living their dream.

Which reminds me, I need a new job/more money so I can finance a second hand v8 vantage that I can't really afford hehe

Geoff Ashcroft

351 posts

207 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Thanks Chris - great insight into showing how exotica can be affordable over a short term, for those wanting to live the dream, tick the box etc.
As you already pointed out, why bust your nuts working all hours if you can't enjoy some reward? Your experience proves that such motors are not out of reach, even if they're only within reach for a short period of time.

It must be harder to make a car choice than sort through the numbers - so many to choose from, so little time to fit it all in.

KTF

9,807 posts

151 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Tim16V said:
I think you've done very well with this.

Bought it right at the initial depreciation 'sweet spot' and whilst you've done £10k dealer margin in depreciation (plus monthly payments of course), you've had a stonking 6,000 miles out of it under full warranty!
Plus the 'could have bought a Boxster outright' downpayment on top.

CampDavid

9,145 posts

199 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
jhoneyball said:
A 250k car has 40k-ish of VAT for starters. So the car itself is worth only max of 190k as soon as you drive it off the forecourt, taking into account a reasonable dealer restocking/selling fee.

A 250k isnt a 250k car. Its a 210k car with 40k of vat. The first owner pays the vat. Subsequent owners dont. Blame HMRC.
Again, this is bks

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
And, of course, you can't get as many articles out of an Audi :-)

Megaflow

9,431 posts

226 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Reardy Mister said:
Giving 1500 per month to Ferrari Financial Services.

FFS.

Genius.
I had to read that a couple of times before the penny dropped.

Very good...

hehe

craig_m67

949 posts

189 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all


It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.

Edited by craig_m67 on Wednesday 23 July 14:20

neil1jnr

1,462 posts

156 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
greygoose said:
I sometimes wonder if some posters actually like cars at all or just spend their time compiling spreadsheets, as he says the FF had a sense of occasion every time he started it and he justified the expense to himself, there is more to life than balance sheets and I enjoyed the insight into running such an exotic car.
Totally agree

mr_tony

6,328 posts

270 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
craig_m67 said:


It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.

Edited by craig_m67 on Wednesday 23 July 14:20
Life moves pretty fast. In an FF...

kikiturbo

170 posts

228 months

Wednesday 23rd July 2014
quotequote all
Chris Harris said:
Entirely fair if you can buy a lightly used FF for similar money to a new German - which you can. It accurately reflects the way people buy cars: something new and aspirational, or something apparently unobtainable, a year or two old for similar money that requires a deep intake of breath before signing.
Exactly

in 2008 I bought a 2 yo mitsubishi evo 9 with 8000 km on the clock for 60% of it's original price... I was in the budget for, and looking at buying a new clio sport really but took the plunge.. smile
Best decision ever.

p.s. all this c$%ap about "how can Chris afford this and that" is really below par in a automotive forum.. Let the man enjoy his metal, where else will you see a muddy mountainbike in an FF, FFS.. smile