RE: Bentley Continental GT Speed... at speed

RE: Bentley Continental GT Speed... at speed

Thursday 24th July 2014

Bentley Continental GT Speed... at speed

How to test Bentley's fastest ever production car? To the runway!



For the customer wanting extra performance from their Golf GTI, there is the Golf GTI Performance Pack. Those after a more extreme fast Astra will most likely be offered an Astra VXR Extreme soon. And when a Ferrari 458 isn't, well, speciale enough, then you know where to look.

635hp, 607lb ft but only 653mm long
635hp, 607lb ft but only 653mm long
So if you want speed, you buy Speed. The flagship Continental GT has been refreshed for the 2015 model year, now up to 635hp from the twin-turbo W12 and 206mph all out. As the VW Group's new centre of excellence for the W12, Crewe is quite proud of what it has achieved and what the engine is now capable of. Any journalist heard calling said engine a V12 by accident was to return home immediately via Crewe station. Standard class.

Anyway, though it's never been regarded as the most characterful engine in the world, the W12 is an interesting old lump. The staggered bores make it very compact (it just looks huge with all the ancillaries attached) so it's now not far from 1hp per mm (635hp from an engine length of 653mm). Power is up 215hp from the first 420hp (naturally aspirated) VW W12 with CO2 down 20 per cent to 338g/km.

The need for...
On the road, pathetically one dimensional and predictable though it sounds, the sensation of insatiable speed is the overriding one. You brake at the end of slip roads such is the velocity accrued almost by accident. Lifting off simply doesn't do much as the momentum of 2.5 tonnes charges on.

Speed will be up there very soon
Speed will be up there very soon
The torque peak of 607lb ft is there from 2,000rpm to 5,000 rpm, meaning a torrent of overtaking thrust (and it really is thrust) is always on offer. The eight-speed auto won't kick down unless you really boot it, giving a real sensation of surfing a torque wave as the prow rises and the serenity is just slightly disturbed. You could probably pull a tree stump with the torque...

Overtaking slower traffic is comical. Change down if you must then simply surge past the next target with casual disdain and a muffled bark from behind. The Speed would surely excel in that old road test favourite, the time exposed to danger assessment, as passing vehicles always, always takes less time than predicted. It's quite a feat, and never fails to amaze.

Ready for take-off
But there's only so much that can be gleaned about the performance of a 206mph car on the road. So Bentley did the decent thing, got a long stretch of straight road (the Campbeltown Airport runway) and sent the Speeds down it as fast as they could go.

Still a fine place to attempt 200mph
Still a fine place to attempt 200mph
Anyone hoping for a dramatic yarn on eking out every last mph, using 635hp to battle the forces of nature and hitting 200mph, will be disappointed as I only managed 182mph. Sorry. The Speed charges through its first few gears rapidly, the acceleration that proved so addictive on the road not relenting until about 150mph. After then it remains brisk, 160 and then 170mph passing with seemingly plenty of runway remaining. Only of course above 170mph distance is covered at quite a rate. My last glance at the speedo was at 180mph with the Speed feeling imperious and eminently capable of hitting that fastest-Bentley-ever top speed.

Audience participation
So yes, the Bentley GT Speed can do speed exceptionally well. But in its quest for outright performance the fleshy, fallible thing in the massage seat can feel a bit left out. Aloof is perhaps a little harsh and some may indeed argue the Speed's unruffled nature is kind of the point but you can't help but crave a little more excitement sometimes. For all Bentley's talk of a lower ride height, more negative camber and stiffer springs the GT Speed remains a car for covering ground and marvelling at its ability rather than falling for its charms. Accelerate and smile, brake and marvel at the ceramic brakes' power (420mm front discs!), turn, accelerate and smile again.

Big Scottish roads played to Speed's strengths
Big Scottish roads played to Speed's strengths
Astonishingly powerful though it is, the W12 engine does contribute to that overall impression. The noise just isn't that exciting, something that not only its rivals excel at but its cheaper V8 S counterpart does too.

Maybe any criticisms of a slightly unengaging dynamic repertoire are redundant given how comprehensively the GT Speed nails its going really fast brief. In a straight line, around corners, slowing down, the Speed is quick. Very quick. For some that and its flagship status will be enough but from a PH perspective the V8 S is probably the more appealing Conti GT, at least until the GT3-R is around.


BENTLEY CONTINENTAL GT SPEED (15MY)
Engine:
5,998cc, W12, twin-turbocharged
Transmission: 8-speed ZF automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 635@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 607@2,000-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.2 sec
Top speed: 206mph
Weight: 2,320kg
MPG: 19.5 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 338g/km
Price: £156,700







Author
Discussion

Zumbruk

Original Poster:

7,848 posts

260 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
Campbeltown airport??? Blimey, when did it stop being Macrahanish? I would have thought the drive from Glasgow would have been more exciting (especially if you go down the East side of the Kintyre peninsula along the B842, rather than along the A83.) We went to Carradale for years on holiday and I always enjoyed big chunks of the drive - The Rest and Be Thankful, the drive along Loch Fynne and especially turning off onto the B842 just south of Tarbert, driving over the top of Kintyre and Arran hoving into view.

All nostalgic now.

P4ROT

1,219 posts

193 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
Amazing stats for what is essentially a flying house- the brakes must be monstorous.

SimonD

486 posts

281 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
I like it but still can't fathom why they call these engines W12. That suggests 2 cranks (2 points at the bottom of the 'W'). It's not a V12 either, obviously. Looking across my keyboard I can't find any letter or symbol that adequately describes their configuration though, so,... as you were.

blprice1

83 posts

143 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
'Power is up 215hp from the first 420hp VW W12 with CO2 down 20 per cent to 338g/km.'

Those stats alone are incredible! It's amazing what's being achieved, not only with Bentley but across nearly ever manufacturer.

darkangelv2

11 posts

178 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
SimonD said:
I like it but still can't fathom why they call these engines W12. That suggests 2 cranks (2 points at the bottom of the 'W'). It's not a V12 either, obviously. Looking across my keyboard I can't find any letter or symbol that adequately describes their configuration though, so,... as you were.
It's essentially a K on it's back isn't it? A K12?

Lowtimer

4,286 posts

168 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
P4ROT said:
Amazing stats for what is essentially a flying house- the brakes must be monstorous.
As it said in the piece, 16.5" ceramic discs...

It is an impressive thing but I can't help feeling the V8S is a better all-round car.

mustard tab

293 posts

177 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
I will probably get flamed for this, but I just don't get why this car is well thought of.
I was passenger in one of the standard cars a couple of years ago, on a business trip from Birmingham to Leeds, and yes it was fast, but it was also uncomfortable, had a pants Satnav, (same as the one fitted to a Skoda Superb Mk1), and noisy.
And whilst I am here, why is it that this car is hailed as something magnificent, and a VW Pheaton is not, when they are both made by the same company, I get the feeling that most Bentley purchasers are unaware of their cars lineage.

InsolentMinx

94 posts

141 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
was I the only one expecting a video?

frown

thejpster

227 posts

162 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
SimonD said:
I like it but still can't fathom why they call these engines W12. That suggests 2 cranks (2 points at the bottom of the 'W'). It's not a V12 either, obviously. Looking across my keyboard I can't find any letter or symbol that adequately describes their configuration though, so,... as you were.
In German, W is called a Double V, which is a perfect description.

alock

4,227 posts

211 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
blprice1 said:
'Power is up 215hp from the first 420hp VW W12 with CO2 down 20 per cent to 338g/km.'

Those stats alone are incredible! It's amazing what's being achieved, not only with Bentley but across nearly ever manufacturer.
That's the NA power figure from the Phaeton. The Bentley always had twin turbos and over 500bhp.

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
mustard tab said:
I will probably get flamed for this, but I just don't get why this car is well thought of.
I was passenger in one of the standard cars a couple of years ago, on a business trip from Birmingham to Leeds, and yes it was fast, but it was also uncomfortable, had a pants Satnav, (same as the one fitted to a Skoda Superb Mk1), and noisy.
And whilst I am here, why is it that this car is hailed as something magnificent, and a VW Pheaton is not, when they are both made by the same company, I get the feeling that most Bentley purchasers are unaware of their cars lineage.
Noisy? Uncomfortable? You sure it wasn't broken dear boy?

Wouldloveacsl

603 posts

194 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
I'm sure it's lovely, and very fast, but I would rather own an Arnage T

W8aMinute

70 posts

151 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
I thought VW managed to squeeze 600hp out of a naturally aspirated W12 for their Nardo Coupe?

As for the Bentley, while lots of reviews demand "soul" from the cars, when you have to live with a car every day or drive it for hundreds of miles, that "soul" can often become very tiring...

gasimova

6 posts

135 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
I was lucky enough to own one of the initial Flying Spurs in 2007.
The car was driven hard on business trips throughout Europe and covered
about 100,000 miles up to disposal last year. Although the early cars
were nothing like today's product, nonetheless, they were incredibly reliable,
incredibly fast and very safe and stable at very high speed - I am talking
about speeds in excess of 160 mph - not in the UK though ! Say what you like,
when you drive one of these cars to their max - you do not say it is the
Holy Grail - you say Holy st !

0llie

3,007 posts

196 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
I know these have been revised a few times over the years, but they do seem to be getting much easier on the eye with age.

When the original came out at around the same time as the DB9, for me there was no contest. Now though, I'm not sure the DB9 would get a second look.

There were a couple at the Game Fair last weekend, and they had a red V8 S GTC with black wheels. In theory it sounds horrendous, but it was a superb looking car, something like this (although a slightly darker red;



Probably says more about my lack of taste more than anything
boxedin

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

205 months

PH Reportery Lad

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
InsolentMinx said:
was I the only one expecting a video?

frown
Sorry, that would have been quite cool really. FWIW it was probably the most undramatic 180mph you could ever experience...

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

205 months

PH Reportery Lad

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
W8aMinute said:
I thought VW managed to squeeze 600hp out of a naturally aspirated W12 for their Nardo Coupe?

As for the Bentley, while lots of reviews demand "soul" from the cars, when you have to live with a car every day or drive it for hundreds of miles, that "soul" can often become very tiring...
I know what you mean there having covered a fair few miles in a Caterham wink But something like a Vanquish does excitement and the grand tourer thing better for me. Perhaps a DB9 would also but I've not driven one of those!

InsolentMinx

94 posts

141 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
Matt Bird said:
Sorry, that would have been quite cool really. FWIW it was probably the most undramatic 180mph you could ever experience...
smile that's ok, I was just intrigued by the comment about underwhelming exhaust note and thought a vid would help. I'm sure it's still mightilly impressive compared to my little Toyota though.


unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
gasimova said:
I was lucky enough to own one of the initial Flying Spurs in 2007.
The car was driven hard on business trips throughout Europe and covered
about 100,000 miles up to disposal last year. Although the early cars
were nothing like today's product, nonetheless, they were incredibly reliable,
incredibly fast and very safe and stable at very high speed - I am talking
about speeds in excess of 160 mph - not in the UK though ! Say what you like,
when you drive one of these cars to their max - you do not say it is the
Holy Grail - you say Holy st !
Fabulous. beer

rogerhudson

338 posts

158 months

Thursday 24th July 2014
quotequote all
So a Bentley owner needs to drive up and down an airfield to enjoy his car? isn't that silly.
Isn't this design getting old when you have to look carefully to see a new one isn't a £30k second-hand one.
They last well but a total new car design is needed.