£20k - M3 or Cayman S?

£20k - M3 or Cayman S?

Author
Discussion

paulmoonraker

2,850 posts

163 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
How about getting a warranty quote if its high then you know how much risk they are building into the premium.



Darn I should stop reading these great what car threads as these are all cars on my would like to own list - even a Cayman but a 911 first.
Most warranty companies have dodged these large claims.

Read the Hartech information thoroughly including the responses he has posted on here, rather than listening to people on here who have not owned or researched one properly.

In summary (and from memory), the conclusion (from Hartech, who have extensively researched the problem) seems to be that there is a cooling problem that causes the oil to bubble on the cylinder walls.

Specifically, if after hard driving you stop suddenly at say lights, then boot it really hard away, the cooling system has slowed and for a split second the cylinder wall overheats causing the oil to bubble and the piston to scrape the cylinder wall.

Answer, bear this in mind and don't boot away from the lights.

Hartech seem to think the auto boxes are worst effected, possibly because they pull away sometimes in 2nd gear.

CarAbuser

695 posts

124 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
Did the M3 not suffer from Vanos failures then?

I know the rear sub-frame is a common failure, but I think that's only ~£1-2k?
I think that was the E46 M3. Not the E9x.

I have heard of M3s going bang. But not on the same scale as Gen1 Caymans.

I did take a look at OPC warranty but aside from costing a huge amount of money people were complaining that Porsche would not cover the engine failures on the Cayman if the cars had been over revved in the past. So if a previous owner has mis-shifted then you're screwed.

paulmoonraker

2,850 posts

163 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
CarAbuser said:
I think that was the E46 M3. Not the E9x.

I have heard of M3s going bang. But not on the same scale as Gen1 Caymans.

I did take a look at OPC warranty but aside from costing a huge amount of money people were complaining that Porsche would not cover the engine failures on the Cayman if the cars had been over revved in the past. So if a previous owner has mis-shifted then you're screwed.
They will insist on a bore scope if it shows to have been overreved. If it's passes then they will cover it.

I know because I went through the process (incidentally not taking the warranty out and declining the bore scope).

CarAbuser

695 posts

124 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
paulmoonraker said:
Most warranty companies have dodged these large claims.

Read the Hartech information thoroughly including the responses he has posted on here, rather than listening to people on here who have not owned or researched one properly.

In summary (and from memory), the conclusion (from Hartech, who have extensively researched the problem) seems to be that there is a cooling problem that causes the oil to bubble on the cylinder walls.

Specifically, if after hard driving you stop suddenly at say lights, then boot it really hard away, the cooling system has slowed and for a split second the cylinder wall overheats causing the oil to bubble and the piston to scrape the cylinder wall.

Answer, bear this in mind and don't boot away from the lights.

Hartech seem to think the auto boxes are worst effected, possibly because they pull away sometimes in 2nd gear.
The auto boxes are also bad because the scoring is worse when the engine has spent its life at low revs.
You're stuck between a manual that could have been money-shifted and an auto box that slowly wrecks the engine!

paulmoonraker

2,850 posts

163 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
CarAbuser said:
The auto boxes are also bad because the scoring is worse when the engine has spent its life at low revs.
You're stuck between a manual that could have been money-shifted and an auto box that slowly wrecks the engine!
Yes, because of the torque they develop. Again, all on Hartechs site.

walm

10,609 posts

202 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
I am never sure that (ex-Hartech and a couple of other specialists) third-party warranties are worth it.

However, it would be interesting to compare the quotes on different cars since that would at least show the implied relative expense of likely faults.

Froomee

1,423 posts

169 months

Monday 18th August 2014
quotequote all
AUC Z4MR or MC for around £15-£17k. Then negotiate two years warranty into the price.

I preferred the Z4M over both the Cayman S (better engine/sound plus I prefer the looks with CSL's, CH's, etc) and the E46 M3 (felt more of an occasion, preferred the looks and didn't need four seats).

Depreciation is low, running costs are relatively low and potential costs will be £0 with the AUC warranty as it is practically as good as a new car warranty (they covered a lost washer jet cover and cracked rear centre brake light for instance).

Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
PompeyPaul said:
Tuvra said:
whistle
I LOVE the look of these, but over budget around 25k generally I think. May be able to stretch to a 4.2 but not an XKR.
confused

There are 12+ "New Shape" XKR's on Ebay below £20,995 both coupe and convertible. Not the 5.0 XKR but a 4.2 XKR non the less.


Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
PompeyPaul said:
Tuvra said:
whistle
I LOVE the look of these, but over budget around 25k generally I think. May be able to stretch to a 4.2 but not an XKR.
confused

There are 12+ "New Shape" XKR's on Ebay below £20,995 both coupe and convertible. Not the 5.0 XKR but a 4.2 XKR non the less.
My boss had the XKR-S dynamic vert - what a great sounding thing fast too, isn't the 4.2supercharged a lot slower

Legend83

9,975 posts

222 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
If you need positive stories my BIL has had his 55 plate Cayman for two years now and done 20k miles.

Bought privately.

Nothing had gone wrong for the previous owner and nothing has gone wrong since.

Tyres and servicing.

Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
My boss had the XKR-S dynamic vert - what a great sounding thing fast too, isn't the 4.2supercharged a lot slower
The XKR-S (2008) is also a 4.2 Supercharged V8. I believe the power outputs are very similar to the standard XKR with one having fettled brakes, suspension, wheels etc.


ilduce

485 posts

127 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
jonm01 said:
PompeyPaul said:
Wow, thanks for the heads up. At my budget it won't stretch to one with an OPC warranty frown
Don't let internet scaremongers put you off a great car.
Exactly. I have a Gen 1. It went pop last year. Porsche rebuilt the engine and now it has a renewable and transferable Porsche warranty that will cover it if it goes pop again.

Oh. And it's for sale too!
And it's well under £20k.
And it's white.

Davey S2

13,092 posts

254 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
Scored bores is not a 10k repair, by the way! You'd need to lose the IMS and fk the whole engine to get to that kind of money.
My car had 2 shot cylinder liners and the bill for the repair (admitedly with a few upgrades to minimise it happening again) was just under £8K.

This sort of stuff can't be done by a back street garage and if you use one of the specialists who know what they are doing (Hartech in my case) it comes with a cost.

My Cayman S was utterly brilliant for 4 years but the problems at the end left a very sour taste in my mouth especially as it's a known problem which Porsche does f**k all about unless you have their expensive warranty.

PompeyPaul

Original Poster:

519 posts

183 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
confused

There are 12+ "New Shape" XKR's on Ebay below £20,995 both coupe and convertible. Not the 5.0 XKR but a 4.2 XKR non the less.
Sorry didn't make myself clear. I am (rightly or probably wrongly) a little concerned about spending this sort of money which is a lot to me on a car without a warranty, so would try to aim for approved used. I know you pay more and it may well cancel out what could have been spent on repairs, but just want to avoid any sudden big outlays as far as possible.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

229 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
paulmoonraker said:
PompeyPaul said:
paulmoonraker said:
hehe Indeed. I often did a few shows to pay for the petrol that the M3 relentlessly drank.
Did you find the M3 considerably more thirsty than the STI?
I have a scan gauge in my STi which shows an average of 22.5MPG round town (mixed) and 29MPG on the motorway. The on-board computer in the M3 would show 20MPG or less round town (mixed) and it was impossible to crack 24MPG on a run unless you drove at a cruise controlled 60.

So, not a massive difference and if I am honest, not a personal consideration. Incidentally, the Cayman S was better managing 30MPG on a run with relative ease.
mine returns 25-30MPG when i stick the cruise on at 75mph?


Welshbeef said:
Isn't the E60 M5 engine the most spectacular engine more so than M3
no - its an epic V10 be in no doubt... but the M3's V8 has it beat... i'd go as far as to say its probably one of the finest engines ever built..

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
no - its an epic V10 be in no doubt... but the M3's V8 has it beat... i'd go as far as to say its probably one of the finest engines ever built..
How does it compare to the RS4 V8 - not sure of that revs higher ?

Davey S2

13,092 posts

254 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
Legend83 said:
If you need positive stories my BIL has had his 55 plate Cayman for two years now and done 20k miles.

Bought privately.

Nothing had gone wrong for the previous owner and nothing has gone wrong since.

Tyres and servicing.
That's the motoring equivalent of someone saying their grandfather smoked 80 a day since he was 12 years old and died at 106 so don't worry.

Mine did 50,000 miles in 4 years and several trips all over Europe without missing a beat until the problems started.

I'm not scaremongering but if you are buying a used Cayman you need to go into it in possession of all the facts. This is a well known issue which does affect a percentage of cars which is big enough for purchasers to take serious note of.

Yes you could be lucky and never have any problems with the car and if so you will have great time. Alternatively you could end up with a knackered car that you can't afford to fix and at this budget that's an expensive exercise.

If you don't have the funds to fix it it can seriously affect your enjoyment of the car. You will be wary of driving it hard and your paranoia will turn every small noise into the start of a massive terminal engine implosion.

I never felt the same about my car after I had it back and sold it soon after.

From what I gather the non S model doesn't suffer from this issue to the same extent though.


paulmoonraker

2,850 posts

163 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Fidgits said:
no - its an epic V10 be in no doubt... but the M3's V8 has it beat... i'd go as far as to say its probably one of the finest engines ever built..
How does it compare to the RS4 V8 - not sure of that revs higher ?
The Audi sounds more like a traditional V8. I have never heard anyone claim it to be as good as the BMW though. In fact, I have never heard them mentioned in the same sentence!

That is the one let down of the BMW - the sound. It's fine when its screaming, but when doodling it's too quiet.

paulmoonraker

2,850 posts

163 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
Davey S2 said:
I'm not scaremongering but if you are buying a used Cayman you need to go into it in possession of all the facts. This is a well known issue which does affect a percentage of cars which is big enough for purchasers to take serious note of.
This - just do your home work. If you go as far as to understand the underlying cause (or as best you can), then you can better understand the risk.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Tuesday 19th August 2014
quotequote all
paulmoonraker said:
The Audi sounds more like a traditional V8. I have never heard anyone claim it to be as good as the BMW though. In fact, I have never heard them mentioned in the same sentence!

That is the one let down of the BMW - the sound. It's fine when its screaming, but when doodling it's too quiet.
Top gear TV tested the RS4 M3 V8 and C63 together - hardly anything in it 0-100moh RS4 v M3 but C63 won convincingly
Track M3 ruled
On road - M3 needs revs to be so high that you are over speed limit to access the fun zone whereas C63 fun zone starts at idlec(noise)

Rs4 - didn't that engine win engine of the year some time ago?