RE: Audi RS6 Avant: PH Fleet

RE: Audi RS6 Avant: PH Fleet

Author
Discussion

dukebox9reg

1,570 posts

148 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
I must admit to having the same super or not dilemma with my (admittedly rather slower) turbo estate.

Still trying to work out if the extra mpg gains make up for the extra cost and if not is it worth the extra to gain 14 more hp?

Back on the subject of the RS6 I personally don't see the point in a big superfast load carrier costing 80k+. You're not going to want to stick say a washing machine in the back or fill it with garden rubbish to take to the tip! Hell I worry about getting my estate that messy and it me cost <8% of the RS6 cost!

I know someone who bought one and got the RS6 specifically so he had a nice big boot and could take his dog to the park. So far the dog's never been in it and he's taken the dog out in his mums golf...
In my Cooper S it says 95 on the flap but read the manual and it says run it on super for its true performance or something like that.

I tend to run on tesco 100 or Shell.

Stick the RS6 on a rolling road. Show the difference between 95 and 100 on a modern turbo car.

I know 5th gear years back did a similar test and the good ol'scooby had pretty good gains with super.

Mk5 Golf GTI 95RON 172bhp,BP Ultimate 174bhp, Shell Optimax 177bhp

Hawkeye STI 95RON 235bhp, BP Ultimate 248bhp, Shell 249bhp

How much do people spend on induction kits trying to get a 5bhp gain let alone a 14bhp.





Chris Harris

494 posts

153 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
dukebox9reg said:
In my Cooper S it says 95 on the flap but read the manual and it says run it on super for its true performance or something like that.

I tend to run on tesco 100 or Shell.

Stick the RS6 on a rolling road. Show the difference between 95 and 100 on a modern turbo car.

I know 5th gear years back did a similar test and the good ol'scooby had pretty good gains with super.

Mk5 Golf GTI 95RON 172bhp,BP Ultimate 174bhp, Shell Optimax 177bhp

Hawkeye STI 95RON 235bhp, BP Ultimate 248bhp, Shell 249bhp

How much do people spend on induction kits trying to get a 5bhp gain let alone a 14bhp.
Good idea. I shall do just that.

peterattheboro

1,362 posts

183 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
£22,000 (or thereabouts) on options. OK, I sort of get the RS Suspension and ceramic brakes bit, but £6,000 on a stereo? It's a car, not the Royal Albert Hall.

No wonder Audi choked.
Some people spend more time in their car than they do in their living rooms so why not choose the B&O system? Some people care about sound quality wink

unseen

169 posts

161 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Given the speed of the RS6 can we assume it will acquire a whole new range of dog aroma compared with the s4

DoubleSix

11,714 posts

176 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Chris Harris said:
DoubleSix said:
Come, come. Not everyone who specs them is a wannabe gangster. They offer lots of practical benefits and clearly, whilst subjective, those with an eye for aesthetics think they look pleasing as every marketing photo of a new model has them airbrushed in, including the blooming windscreen!

I just wish I could sensibly have them in-front of the B pillar as it would have prevented the oik in a rusty flatbed from gawping at my OH's legs when stuck in traffic by Temple Meads last Tuesday.
Because of UK law you can't have them all tinted and I think that really breaks-up the shape of the glass-house in profile. So I just have rear blinds for the kids and tell the dog not to wear a heavy jumper.
Fair do's guvnor.

I may have been a very naughty boy and had an ultra light smoke tint fitted ahead of the B pillar to soften the unsightly transition you mention. A policeman did drive it along the M4 for me once (ahem) but he never mentioned it or tore them off for me as I've seen them do on TV


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Chris Harris said:
dukebox9reg said:
In my Cooper S it says 95 on the flap but read the manual and it says run it on super for its true performance or something like that.

I tend to run on tesco 100 or Shell.

Stick the RS6 on a rolling road. Show the difference between 95 and 100 on a modern turbo car.

I know 5th gear years back did a similar test and the good ol'scooby had pretty good gains with super.

Mk5 Golf GTI 95RON 172bhp,BP Ultimate 174bhp, Shell Optimax 177bhp

Hawkeye STI 95RON 235bhp, BP Ultimate 248bhp, Shell 249bhp

How much do people spend on induction kits trying to get a 5bhp gain let alone a 14bhp.
Good idea. I shall do just that.
No idea why would bother tbh? Your car makes 560bhp, not 13bhp. So who cares if it makes 565 or 558 or what ever?

HonestIago

1,719 posts

186 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Why on earth do people use 95 RON to save money? By my calculations, using it instead of SUL for 10,000 miles at 20mpg saves around £160. That is assuming no mpg benefit to SUL. Absolute peanuts in the scheme of things.

wildman0609

885 posts

176 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
I had a long look at one of these when I got my C63 wagon, but I couldn't justify double the price and, its just not a £100k car.

Adrian E

3,248 posts

176 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Chris Harris said:
B&O is surprisingly popular option on all swanky Audis apparently.
Yep and the price varies massively across the different models (although granted you're probably getting a 'lower spec' B&O setup in 3/4/5 Audis than a 6/7/8)

Option prices on identical platform cars can vary quite a bit too - more to do with the ability/willingness to pay than the actual cost+profit margin I presume.


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
So hang on a minute there Mr Harris, I remember the RS4 video a while back where you said about the B5 RS4 that 'I really, really like it' followed by 'I might think about getting one of these'. Now you're saying that all fast Audi's before the B7 you're not really a fan of?

So which one is it?

hwajones

775 posts

181 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Chris Harris said:
yellowbentines said:
A £77k car that doesn't have heated seats or phone preparation as standard?!

The colour suits it well, as it does seem like quite a dull way to spend £100k on a car.
Lack of heated seats as standard is criminal in my book.
£100K is ludicrous for this car but no doubt they will sell...
I'm sure Audi know their market by now.

Paying extra for heated seats in any modern car of this calibre is a joke.

Clivey

5,110 posts

204 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
Are my eyes deceiving me or does your car not have the grille mounted fog/driving lights Chris? The Aussies went for the optional £750 auxiliary inclement illumination pack perhaps?
What you're referring to isn't a fog light, it's a sensor for active cruise control etc. wink

the_hood

771 posts

194 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
A £77k car that doesn't have heated seats or phone preparation as standard?!
It never ceases to surprise me how poor the standard spec can be on such expensive cars.

whoami

13,151 posts

240 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
I just wish I could sensibly have them in-front of the B pillar as it would have prevented the oik in a rusty flatbed from gawping at my OH's legs when stuck in traffic by Temple Meads last Tuesday.
Sorry.

I didn't think he'd noticed.

DoubleSix

11,714 posts

176 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
whoami said:
DoubleSix said:
I just wish I could sensibly have them in-front of the B pillar as it would have prevented the oik in a rusty flatbed from gawping at my OH's legs when stuck in traffic by Temple Meads last Tuesday.
Sorry.

I didn't think he'd noticed.
smile

SHE didn't but I fooking did! And lent across to share my thoughts!

Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Always liked the fast Audi estates, but never bought one due to being scared of potential bork. So instead I've stuck with Range Rovers for doing big sized car stuff.

They're coming for me soon.

BeMo

109 posts

183 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Really like these cars, they just look 'right' and also very menacing.

Saw a dark purple one on some website last week. It looked absolutely bloody fantastic, Merlin Purple I believe it's called. I'm fairly sure it's an Audi 'exclusive' range colour but looked good either way! As someone said before it also looks good in red with the black detailing.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Impasse said:
Always liked the fast Audi estates, but never bought one due to being scared of potential bork. So instead I've stuck with Range Rovers for doing big sized car stuff.
What?? That^^^ is man logic at it's best! ;-) You didn't buy an expensive but generally reliable audi but you brought an expensive but catastrophically unreliable RR instead? Brilliant. I applaud you sir! ;-)

dukebox9reg

1,570 posts

148 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Chris Harris said:
dukebox9reg said:
In my Cooper S it says 95 on the flap but read the manual and it says run it on super for its true performance or something like that.

I tend to run on tesco 100 or Shell.

Stick the RS6 on a rolling road. Show the difference between 95 and 100 on a modern turbo car.

I know 5th gear years back did a similar test and the good ol'scooby had pretty good gains with super.

Mk5 Golf GTI 95RON 172bhp,BP Ultimate 174bhp, Shell Optimax 177bhp

Hawkeye STI 95RON 235bhp, BP Ultimate 248bhp, Shell 249bhp

How much do people spend on induction kits trying to get a 5bhp gain let alone a 14bhp.
Good idea. I shall do just that.
No idea why would bother tbh? Your car makes 560bhp, not 13bhp. So who cares if it makes 565 or 558 or what ever?
Just out of curiosity if anything. Doubt at that power level that 20bhp would be missed.

5th gear vid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQghB4asSnI

alock

4,227 posts

211 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Are you stuck in 1998 on 56k dial up?? ;-)
No, but I only get about 600Kb/s from that server so the image takes over one minute to download.