RE: Jaguar Mk2 by Ian Callum

RE: Jaguar Mk2 by Ian Callum

Author
Discussion

swisstoni

17,010 posts

279 months

Saturday 30th August 2014
quotequote all
Would have thought it could have been done cleaner, what with him being a designer and all.

jamieduff1981

8,025 posts

140 months

Saturday 30th August 2014
quotequote all
Escort3500 said:
V1C said:
I love it, the fact he's designed for himself too, I really like the fact you can tell that this isn't the standard shape and look he'd design to appeal to a mass of potential customers but just gone for something that appeals to his personal taste.
We're in a minority here, but I think it looks great. Yes, the front spoiler treatment is a bit odd, but it's a good modern take on a classic saloon otherwise.
I like it too. It's interesting to see what a designer does for himself rather than to sell to as many people as possible.

It's individual. smile

medieval

1,499 posts

211 months

Saturday 30th August 2014
quotequote all
I love the Mk 11 but this however is a gross parody in my humble opinion

0a

23,901 posts

194 months

Saturday 30th August 2014
quotequote all
Clearly I'm in the minority as I really like that!

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

151 months

Saturday 30th August 2014
quotequote all
Minority just got bigger. Few details I don't like (yes, the air intakes -- and perhaps a tad more ride height).

But that's besides the point. IMVHO it looks great, and the biggest compliment you can make to the original. Bit of well judged cleaning up of the Mk2 shape, few technical updates. Bang you have a very pretty car that does not look out of place in 2014 and certainly drives really well.

If I had the funds, I would love to do something similar. Perhaps starting from an AC Aceca or a SAAB 99.

Tahiti

987 posts

247 months

Saturday 30th August 2014
quotequote all
It's mainly a thumbs up from me too. I'd drive it.

Cerbman

565 posts

278 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
VladD said:
Can't understand the hate myself, but then I own an S-Type.

Looks to me like he's gone for a halfway house between original and S-Type R.

I thought the same as you. BTW, I like the MK2 and the STR.

carinaman

21,298 posts

172 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Fire99 said:
I think this minus the mirrors but perhaps adding Ian Callum's wheels and slightly lowered suspension, would be perfect.

Ian Callum's looks out of sorts with its integrated bumpers and OTT vents in the front wings..
I didn't notice the mirrors until you mentioned them, but you're right.

BHC

17,540 posts

179 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
I think it looks crap.

And why did his mate have so many dads?

SuperHangOn

3,486 posts

153 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
When it comes to classics, I would fit some sensible bits and bobs to make it useable and reliable (e.g. updated cooling system and brakes) and leave it there. Mess with it too much and you lose the beauty and character, totally defeating the object. Whatever you do, it will never perform like a modern car.

That thing has pretty much become a kit car.

bobberz

1,832 posts

199 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Good on him for designing something for himself. If he likes it, that's all that matters.

However, it occurs to me that a better MkII with more modern performance already exists, and has for decades:



Taking out that lardy lump of iron and replacing it with a better, lighter, more compact engine was the best thing that ever happened to the MkII.

One can only imagine how good the E-type would've been with that engine!


alpha channel

1,387 posts

162 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Just doesn't look quite right to me, not entirely sure what but there's something about the wheels/tyres/possibly lowered suspension that's bugging me.

DRodgers

44 posts

125 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Geoff Lawson designed the S type not Callum

DRodgers

44 posts

125 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
Geoff Lawson designed the S type not Callum

swisstoni

17,010 posts

279 months

Sunday 31st August 2014
quotequote all
alpha channel said:
Just doesn't look quite right to me, not entirely sure what but there's something about the wheels/tyres/possibly lowered suspension that's bugging me.
I think they have widened the track, or at least the wheel offset too much. It looks awkward.

Bodo

12,375 posts

266 months

Monday 1st September 2014
quotequote all
NXXN said:
I would have gone with a smaller Mk.1 style grill and split bumpers like an XK.
Your wish has been granted.


DeolTheBeast

449 posts

146 months

Monday 1st September 2014
quotequote all
Bodo said:
NXXN said:
I would have gone with a smaller Mk.1 style grill and split bumpers like an XK.
Your wish has been granted.

My eyes. shoot

richard300

1,085 posts

209 months

Monday 1st September 2014
quotequote all
I get the idea of having a classic car with modern mechanics and equipment - But i think the concept works best when the car looks as original as possible.

This is just about perfection, in my eyes......

http://www.jdclassics.co.uk/showrooms/Jaguar-Mk11-...

coppice

8,612 posts

144 months

Monday 1st September 2014
quotequote all
bobberz said:
Good on him for designing something for himself. If he likes it, that's all that matters.

However, it occurs to me that a better MkII with more modern performance already exists, and has for decades:



Taking out that lardy lump of iron and replacing it with a better, lighter, more compact engine was the best thing that ever happened to the MkII.

One can only imagine how good the E-type would've been with that engine!

Err..not very well I imagine. 2.5litre V8 developing 140 bhp where a 4.2litre 6 developing 265bhp (allegedly)lived. The V8 was a lovely engine though- drove a friend's DArt with the V8 and sounded lovely .

But ..I bet you meant to refer to the Majestic Major V8 perhaps? 4.5 litre and 220ish bhp ?

MikeO996

2,008 posts

224 months

Monday 1st September 2014
quotequote all
So is it a one off?
If so why invite the "VIP Jaguar" owners and the press?
Write up pretty unclear whether this is a personal vanity project or testing the water for something more.