RE: Ian Callum's Jag Mk2 to enter production
Discussion
ChemicalChaos said:
doogz said:
Bodo said:
It was not offensive when reported it's Ian Callum's personal car/expression. Offering a chav'ed Mk II, however, is tasteless.
What's chav about it?The stereo?
100SRV said:
Hmmm, not fantastic is it?
The front valance apertures - cheap looking and not in keeping with the rest of the car
The wheels - too wide
If it wasn't Ian Callum associated with it what sort of reception would it receive?
Stop "re-imagining" things and design something fresh FFS
IndeedThe front valance apertures - cheap looking and not in keeping with the rest of the car
The wheels - too wide
If it wasn't Ian Callum associated with it what sort of reception would it receive?
Stop "re-imagining" things and design something fresh FFS
If I chose to drive an improved Mk2 Jaguar I would expect it to look original at first glance, chromed bumpers especially.
Modern width wheels maybe but with original type hubcaps and I would expect to see a polished XK six when I lifted the bonnet, this engine, its sound and look are the essence of the car.
I would not object to TBI disguised as Webers, aircon, PAS, better seats in original shade etc, as long as the whole did not look like an outlaw chav hot rod like the featured car.
Modern width wheels maybe but with original type hubcaps and I would expect to see a polished XK six when I lifted the bonnet, this engine, its sound and look are the essence of the car.
I would not object to TBI disguised as Webers, aircon, PAS, better seats in original shade etc, as long as the whole did not look like an outlaw chav hot rod like the featured car.
I think you're all being a bit harsh about this. I'm not a fan of the Mk2 design but it's just a resto-mod type of car. If you guys don't hate subtle stuff like this you will hate others with modern powertrains in them and a stereo with mp3 support, etc. Some even have neons and spinners. I'll stop teasing you now.
I'll voice an opinion like the rest but honestly who cares?! You're getting all riled up about something you will ever buy and may never see in the real world! Some of you will probably take comfort from that.
I'll voice an opinion like the rest but honestly who cares?! You're getting all riled up about something you will ever buy and may never see in the real world! Some of you will probably take comfort from that.
iloveboost said:
I think you're all being a bit harsh about this. I'm not a fan of the Mk2 design but it's just a resto-mod type of car. If you guys don't hate subtle stuff like this you will hate others with modern powertrains in them and a stereo with mp3 support, etc. Some even have neons and spinners. I'll stop teasing you now.
I'll voice an opinion like the rest but honestly who cares?! You're getting all riled up about something you will never buy and may never see in the real world! Some of you will probably take comfort from that.
I agree. I'll voice an opinion like the rest but honestly who cares?! You're getting all riled up about something you will never buy and may never see in the real world! Some of you will probably take comfort from that.
Personally I love it. I acknowledge that it's not others' cup of tea, but I really don't get the hate. Who cares? So the people who hate it are going to spend their £300k-odd on something else then, presumably?
Seriously, there are far more worthy things to direct your vitriol at than this.
After thinking about this a little more I think this has been done the wrong way around, they should have taken a modern Jaguar, something common cheap and unloved (S Type?) and made it retro, like some firms do with Porsches.
This approach would save genuine MK2s for the classic enthusiast and satisfy the demand for a retro styled car with modern underpinnings. Probably cheaper too as donor cars are available for way less than sixties cars and already have PAS, Aircon etc.
This approach would save genuine MK2s for the classic enthusiast and satisfy the demand for a retro styled car with modern underpinnings. Probably cheaper too as donor cars are available for way less than sixties cars and already have PAS, Aircon etc.
[quote=B10]Not for me. There seems to be a fashion to make cars look menacing and possibly owned by an oligarch / drug dealer. Personally I prefer beautiful cars in pretty colours; like my women. So a Mk11 in a period colour with chrome bumpers rather than plastic bumpers, pointless vents and a colour akin to light tarmac.
agree with above, mk 2, 340 and S Types all period elegant, Callum version lacks the historic lines and body flow, not for me at all, restore and update the original shell and go almost to the expensive NZ version.
many beautiful rebuilt, restored with tasteful modern upgrades are produced in this country and side by side with the Callum would only underline the wonderful and original shape.
p.s. I do not have one, just an original shape Series 1 4.2 fhc - fantastic shape as well.
agree with above, mk 2, 340 and S Types all period elegant, Callum version lacks the historic lines and body flow, not for me at all, restore and update the original shell and go almost to the expensive NZ version.
many beautiful rebuilt, restored with tasteful modern upgrades are produced in this country and side by side with the Callum would only underline the wonderful and original shape.
p.s. I do not have one, just an original shape Series 1 4.2 fhc - fantastic shape as well.
I love classic cars. Almost all of my car passion is devoted to this 4-wheeled genre. I particularly adore classic Jags and in particular; Mk1/2 & E-Type. I also appreciate that each individual has their own specific sense of good taste. My own says that this car is UAF and I can't believe either CMC, nor Ian Callum (of DB7/current XK, etc) fame have seen fit to put their name to it. The exterior looks like it's crashed through a Max Power show and the interior looks like how 'pros' were 'modding' classics in the early '00's an Eagle-type job this is not although the price tag seems not to suggest this.
Just my opinion though!
Just my opinion though!
JonRB said:
Last time I saw one for sale was at Racing Green in 2009 and it was for £80k all in.
Beecham Jaguar Mk2 by JonRB, on Flickr
I always thought that the contemporary wing mirrors fitted to these MK2 conversions (and their E-Types) looked faintly ridiculous and virtually ruined the car
Beecham Jaguar Mk2 by JonRB, on Flickr
I always thought that the contemporary wing mirrors fitted to these MK2 conversions (and their E-Types) looked faintly ridiculous and virtually ruined the car
Edited by JonRB on Thursday 4th September 17:28
kramv8 said:
JonRB said:
Last time I saw one for sale was at Racing Green in 2009 and it was for £80k all in.
Beecham Jaguar Mk2 by JonRB, on Flickr
I always thought that the contemporary wing mirrors fitted to these MK2 conversions (and their E-Types) looked faintly ridiculous and virtually ruined the car
Beecham Jaguar Mk2 by JonRB, on Flickr
I always thought that the contemporary wing mirrors fitted to these MK2 conversions (and their E-Types) looked faintly ridiculous and virtually ruined the car
Edited by JonRB on Thursday 4th September 17:28
However, it was an option. RG had another Beecham MKII which retained original trim.
I came extremely close to buying the latter as it looked to be a perfect family car with original MKII looks but driving like a modern XKR.
I owned a Mk2 in the 1970s and loved it so perhaps I'm a bit biased...But, the wheels are too large, makes the car look a bit clumsy, and the exhausts must be to one side and not in the middle.
I'm sure it'll drive beautifully, but a mint original 3.8 is the one I'd go for.
The depreciation on the Callum car will surely be steep, whilst the value of a mint original will increase.
I'm sure it'll drive beautifully, but a mint original 3.8 is the one I'd go for.
The depreciation on the Callum car will surely be steep, whilst the value of a mint original will increase.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff