RE: Jaguar XE - full details

RE: Jaguar XE - full details

Author
Discussion

aeropilot

34,600 posts

227 months

Thursday 25th September 2014
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
so this one isn't built from a mondeo then?
You are joking......?

r11co

6,244 posts

230 months

Monday 29th September 2014
quotequote all
Just noticed this minute that the wheels on the photo promo XE are very similar to those fitted to the MG6...



A nod to its former stablemate?

Edited by r11co on Monday 29th September 09:22

Wills2

22,832 posts

175 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
Huge amounts of PR weeks ago, but when is anyone going to get to drive the thing and give it a review?


smashy

3,039 posts

158 months

Wednesday 19th November 2014
quotequote all
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
smashy said:
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please smile Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
smashy said:
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please smile Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
I think they'd just go with a 5 litre if that were the case, seeing as they already make one.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
I think they'd just go with a 5 litre if that were the case, seeing as they already make one.
Good thinking. I'll have one of those, please. biggrin

Lowtimer

4,286 posts

168 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
Have they not now killed the N/A 5.0 V8 in favour of supercharged sixes on their new models? I thought they had.

smashy

3,039 posts

158 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please smile Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
er the world might not revolve around you I as in me care as I do 25/30k a year and I sadly havent got money to burn,

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
smashy said:
ORD said:
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please smile Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
er the world might not revolve around you I as in me care as I do 25/30k a year and I sadly havent got money to burn,
Isn't it lucky that manufacturers sell the same model of car with different engine options?

DonkeyApple

55,292 posts

169 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please smile Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
Nothing sexier than a Carbon molecule getting it on with two Oxygen molecules. Leaves you salivating with excitement just imagining all the grams as the car cruises past.

Gas masses. That's what rocks a true PHer's world.

'Here son, have this A2 poster of a 318D for your bedroom, now shall we go down to the park and have fun watching everyone else playing?'

8bit

4,867 posts

155 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
smashy said:
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please smile Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
Have you driven a Jag with the top-end 3.0 diesel? I own a 4.2 XKR which I love and I'm a die-hard petrol engine fan but I had an XF S 3.0 as a courtesy car once. I was very impressed, extremely capable engine and a great transmission. More than happy to throw its' tail around if you wanted and alarmingly rapid too.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Thursday 20th November 2014
quotequote all
8bit said:
ORD said:
smashy said:
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please smile Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
Have you driven a Jag with the top-end 3.0 diesel? I own a 4.2 XKR which I love and I'm a die-hard petrol engine fan but I had an XF S 3.0 as a courtesy car once. I was very impressed, extremely capable engine and a great transmission. More than happy to throw its' tail around if you wanted and alarmingly rapid too.
I have no doubt that it is an impressive engine. But I do not have to drive it to tell you that it will be less enjoyable than a big petrol engine.

8bit

4,867 posts

155 months

Monday 24th November 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
I have no doubt that it is an impressive engine. But I do not have to drive it to tell you that it will be less enjoyable than a big petrol engine.
Then perhaps you'd care to share this weekend's winning lottery numbers with me?

Seriously, drive one. I'd say yes, it's not as enjoyable but the margin is a lot less than I thought it would be.

urquattroGus

1,847 posts

190 months

Monday 24th November 2014
quotequote all
So when do we get one with 400bhp plus???

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Monday 24th November 2014
quotequote all
8bit said:
ORD said:
I have no doubt that it is an impressive engine. But I do not have to drive it to tell you that it will be less enjoyable than a big petrol engine.
Then perhaps you'd care to share this weekend's winning lottery numbers with me?

Seriously, drive one. I'd say yes, it's not as enjoyable but the margin is a lot less than I thought it would be.
Driving is dull enough most of the time without adding a diesel engine! I've no interest in torque and outright speed so a good diesel is still just a diesel to me (albeit quieter - i.e. the best you get is silence, whereas a decent petrol engine note is one of the best parts of the driving experience).

8bit

4,867 posts

155 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
I'll concede your point about engine note with one caveat - Range Rover TDV8, they sound awesome, and not just for a diesel. However, I still think to dismiss the 3.0 XF-S as dull outright without even driving it is cutting off your nose to spite your face.

ZesPak

24,430 posts

196 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Meh, most cars are a form of compromise. Compromise comfort for "feeling", size and practicality for weight,...
A diesel is one of these compromises. Yes, a petrol is more responsive and usually sounds better. But a diesel offers comfort (noise, range and torque) and better mpg in return.

I'm willing to make that compromise, you obviously aren't. Each to their own. I probably would rather have a V8 monster, but I live in the real world where petrol is € 1,70/L. I'd rather have a diesel V6 that I can actually drive without cringing every time I start it.

It's just a step in the compromise you make. When you buy this (or a C-class or 3-series for that matter), you already made a number of them. Slating diesels is as academic as the people on the Caterham forum slating cars with a roof and windows.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
Meh, most cars are a form of compromise. Compromise comfort for "feeling", size and practicality for weight,...
A diesel is one of these compromises. Yes, a petrol is more responsive and usually sounds better. But a diesel offers comfort (noise, range and torque) and better mpg in return.

I'm willing to make that compromise, you obviously aren't. Each to their own. I probably would rather have a V8 monster, but I live in the real world where petrol is € 1,70/L. I'd rather have a diesel V6 that I can actually drive without cringing every time I start it.

It's just a step in the compromise you make. When you buy this (or a C-class or 3-series for that matter), you already made a number of them. Slating diesels is as academic as the people on the Caterham forum slating cars with a roof and windows.
Fair point. But the strange thing is that most people don't even bother to work out what running a diesel will actually save them and then look at the saving in the context of the overall cost of motoring. It's usually a few hundred quid except for people who do lots of miles. If that amount of money is a concern, don't buy a new car, let alone a new Jag!


ZesPak

24,430 posts

196 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
Fair point. But the strange thing is that most people don't even bother to work out what running a diesel will actually save them and then look at the saving in the context of the overall cost of motoring. It's usually a few hundred quid except for people who do lots of miles. If that amount of money is a concern, don't buy a new car, let alone a new Jag!
Let's take a 3-series, because it's easy to do:

335xi 335xd
0-62 5,0 4,8
HP 306 313
L/100km 7,6 5,4
CO2 178 143


The petrol is 40% higher, at 20k/year miles (hardly a huge number?), it's not hard to work out that might easily be £800/year!
On top of that, most taxing in most countries works on CO2.

So, in my eyes, you REALLY have to want a petrol engine to justify it.
I love my bike and petrol car, I do think it offers a feel and a noise you won't find in a diesel, I really do.
Yet for a car like this, you'd have to do some serious man maths to make petrol "work". And then settle for the slower, less refined car that's more expensive to run.