RE: Jaguar XE - full details
Discussion
ORD said:
smashy said:
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).ORD said:
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
er the world might not revolve around you I as in me care as I do 25/30k a year and I sadly havent got money to burn,smashy said:
ORD said:
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
er the world might not revolve around you I as in me care as I do 25/30k a year and I sadly havent got money to burn,ORD said:
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).
Nothing sexier than a Carbon molecule getting it on with two Oxygen molecules. Leaves you salivating with excitement just imagining all the grams as the car cruises past. Gas masses. That's what rocks a true PHer's world.
'Here son, have this A2 poster of a 318D for your bedroom, now shall we go down to the park and have fun watching everyone else playing?'
ORD said:
smashy said:
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).8bit said:
ORD said:
smashy said:
,,,and when are they going to stick the XF S 3ltr diesel in it?
Who cares? Stick a proper engine in it instead - a NA 4 litre petrol for me, please Never going to happen, but it's a sad world where we are looking forward to a diesel version (even with 6 cyls).ORD said:
I have no doubt that it is an impressive engine. But I do not have to drive it to tell you that it will be less enjoyable than a big petrol engine.
Then perhaps you'd care to share this weekend's winning lottery numbers with me?Seriously, drive one. I'd say yes, it's not as enjoyable but the margin is a lot less than I thought it would be.
8bit said:
ORD said:
I have no doubt that it is an impressive engine. But I do not have to drive it to tell you that it will be less enjoyable than a big petrol engine.
Then perhaps you'd care to share this weekend's winning lottery numbers with me?Seriously, drive one. I'd say yes, it's not as enjoyable but the margin is a lot less than I thought it would be.
Meh, most cars are a form of compromise. Compromise comfort for "feeling", size and practicality for weight,...
A diesel is one of these compromises. Yes, a petrol is more responsive and usually sounds better. But a diesel offers comfort (noise, range and torque) and better mpg in return.
I'm willing to make that compromise, you obviously aren't. Each to their own. I probably would rather have a V8 monster, but I live in the real world where petrol is € 1,70/L. I'd rather have a diesel V6 that I can actually drive without cringing every time I start it.
It's just a step in the compromise you make. When you buy this (or a C-class or 3-series for that matter), you already made a number of them. Slating diesels is as academic as the people on the Caterham forum slating cars with a roof and windows.
A diesel is one of these compromises. Yes, a petrol is more responsive and usually sounds better. But a diesel offers comfort (noise, range and torque) and better mpg in return.
I'm willing to make that compromise, you obviously aren't. Each to their own. I probably would rather have a V8 monster, but I live in the real world where petrol is € 1,70/L. I'd rather have a diesel V6 that I can actually drive without cringing every time I start it.
It's just a step in the compromise you make. When you buy this (or a C-class or 3-series for that matter), you already made a number of them. Slating diesels is as academic as the people on the Caterham forum slating cars with a roof and windows.
ZesPak said:
Meh, most cars are a form of compromise. Compromise comfort for "feeling", size and practicality for weight,...
A diesel is one of these compromises. Yes, a petrol is more responsive and usually sounds better. But a diesel offers comfort (noise, range and torque) and better mpg in return.
I'm willing to make that compromise, you obviously aren't. Each to their own. I probably would rather have a V8 monster, but I live in the real world where petrol is € 1,70/L. I'd rather have a diesel V6 that I can actually drive without cringing every time I start it.
It's just a step in the compromise you make. When you buy this (or a C-class or 3-series for that matter), you already made a number of them. Slating diesels is as academic as the people on the Caterham forum slating cars with a roof and windows.
Fair point. But the strange thing is that most people don't even bother to work out what running a diesel will actually save them and then look at the saving in the context of the overall cost of motoring. It's usually a few hundred quid except for people who do lots of miles. If that amount of money is a concern, don't buy a new car, let alone a new Jag!A diesel is one of these compromises. Yes, a petrol is more responsive and usually sounds better. But a diesel offers comfort (noise, range and torque) and better mpg in return.
I'm willing to make that compromise, you obviously aren't. Each to their own. I probably would rather have a V8 monster, but I live in the real world where petrol is € 1,70/L. I'd rather have a diesel V6 that I can actually drive without cringing every time I start it.
It's just a step in the compromise you make. When you buy this (or a C-class or 3-series for that matter), you already made a number of them. Slating diesels is as academic as the people on the Caterham forum slating cars with a roof and windows.
ORD said:
Fair point. But the strange thing is that most people don't even bother to work out what running a diesel will actually save them and then look at the saving in the context of the overall cost of motoring. It's usually a few hundred quid except for people who do lots of miles. If that amount of money is a concern, don't buy a new car, let alone a new Jag!
Let's take a 3-series, because it's easy to do:335xi | 335xd | |
---|---|---|
0-62 | 5,0 | 4,8 |
HP | 306 | 313 |
L/100km | 7,6 | 5,4 |
CO2 | 178 | 143 |
The petrol is 40% higher, at 20k/year miles (hardly a huge number?), it's not hard to work out that might easily be £800/year!
On top of that, most taxing in most countries works on CO2.
So, in my eyes, you REALLY have to want a petrol engine to justify it.
I love my bike and petrol car, I do think it offers a feel and a noise you won't find in a diesel, I really do.
Yet for a car like this, you'd have to do some serious man maths to make petrol "work". And then settle for the slower, less refined car that's more expensive to run.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff