RE: Ford Mustang Ecoboost: Driven

RE: Ford Mustang Ecoboost: Driven

Author
Discussion

85Carrera

3,503 posts

238 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
WTF have they done with the front lights though? Looks awful.

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
I also guess the v8 was setup for cruising.
thatguy11 said:
310bhp from a 2.3 4cyl turbo.....so 10 MORE than you got from the 4.6 V8 in the old Mustang GT. That's fairly incredible (or just highlights how crap the old Modular V8 was)

Blakewater

4,309 posts

158 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
It looks great and seems like it might be a decent steer.

Perhaps the relative failure of the GT86/BRZ (in Europe at least) makes me wonder if there is more than a very niche market for petrol coupes, which is a great shame.

I also can't seem it competing very well against the German competition on lease deals...

Still glad they made the effort though.


I think the GT86/BRZ problem is down to insufficient imports meaning long wait times if you order one and badge snobbery. Ford may still get sales of the back of the working class hero image.

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Trouble is the Evo8 engine is heavily stressed compared to the M5 engine. The Evo engine as many called it a chocolate engine for a reason. When engines are made to such a race spec they have Very short service intervals also and tend not to do 150k miles without major rebuilds.

thatguy11 said:
That's the point I was making, that an engine literally half the size of another can achieve the same (or even more) power through turbocharging. Yes the ecoboost engine is newer and more developed, and the Modular wasn't the most efficient of engines, but it's still impressive and shows just how significant turbocharging can be.

An Evo VIII FQ-400's 2.0L I4 produces 400bhp, the same as an E39 M5's 5.0L V8. Is that not impressive either?

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Typical genric bullst spouted from PH nutters. Many of your so called German barges are bigger than the Mustang. I have seen one of these in the flesh and it is not that big.
People like yourself need to stop wearing rose tinted glasses as many of the cars sold in EU over the years are huge and have caught up to the American car sizes.

Qwert1e said:
People didn't buy the Monaro/Vauxhall VXR and aren't buying the Camaro. I doubt they will buy the Mustang either.

In USA these cars are cheap compared with the Germans. In UK they're the same price as the Germans.

And the cars are BIG for the amount of space in them. I don't think it will get much market share.

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Hmmmm @ Dolly Parton and her juicy melons, lol

Chris71 said:
Indeed. A cleaner, greener RHD Mustang is very laudable, but people (usually people from Essex with slightly dodgy moustaches, admittedly) buy muscle cars because they offer a suitably extrovert dollop of Americana.

True, the Mustang could overcome this and sell to people who don't go line dancing and don't have Dolly Parton in the their CD collection, but only if it was much better than its European and Japanese competitors, I think.

I honestly hope to be proved wrong and I applaud Ford for doing it - we need more leftfield choices in the UK market - but a domesticated muscle car seems like an odd proposition.

Qussz

113 posts

121 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
I'm struggling to see why this is better than a Focus ST3, that's even before thinking about cars from other makes.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

136 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
I like it, a lot, the yellow one looks fantastic IMO and I know the whole schtick about it not being a V8 (yet) etc etc but I think it works just fine for the UK market and they'll sell 'em like hot cakes.

Looks cracking.

Mound Dawg

1,915 posts

175 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Groundhog Day.

Those of us with slightly longer memories will remember that Ford did exactly this in the mid 80s and offered a 2.3 turbo four pot 'Stang alongside the 5 litre V8. The 2.3 was faster (in those days both cars ran out at a measly 160-170 bhp) and was sold as the performance option "SVO".

The American public bought the "Five Point Oh" instead and the turbo lasted only two years.

Neil_M

694 posts

185 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
That's a better review than I expected!

My preference would be for the V8, much more character.

If they do it well, it could sell very well.

Great to see Ford doing something a little away, from a "safe bet".

J4CKO

41,604 posts

201 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Qussz said:
I'm struggling to see why this is better than a Focus ST3, that's even before thinking about cars from other makes.
Its Sports Coupe, not a hatchback, its a Mustang, it is more powerful, it is RWD, it is miles rarer.

rehab71

3,362 posts

191 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
I drove the 5.0L V8 today........for about 200 yards!

chrisd87

17 posts

215 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Am I the only one who laments the lack of the V6 this side of the pond?

k-ink

9,070 posts

180 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Qussz said:
I'm struggling to see why this is better than a Focus ST3, that's even before thinking about cars from other makes.
RWD most importantly. Looks. Rarity. Cool factor. Desirability.

^
All alien aspects to a Focus.

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Qussz said:
I'm struggling to see why this is better than a Focus ST3, that's even before thinking about cars from other makes.
Its Sports Coupe, not a hatchback, its a Mustang, it is more powerful, it is RWD, it is miles rarer.
Spot on. It's all about the sense of occasion.

What other car in the UK or on the Continent offers this populist "open road" heritage coupled with the classical form factor of long hood and short rear deck? And for this price?

The EcoBoost version truly is, as the author and others here have already noted, a sort of heir to the fun and sometimes lairy motoring represented by the old Ford Capri.



Mound Dawg

1,915 posts

175 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
But for me the whole point of buying a Mustang is the thumping great V8 growl. I'm not really a fan to be honest so that's the ONLY reason I'd actually buy one.

Am I alone in this?

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

246 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
I'll say it again.

A few sheet metal changes (not even that many, given its unoriginal Ford family face, a few Capri 2.3S badges (2.3 being a traditional German capacity in the past) and they could have also happily fitted a diesel and sold thousands and no-one would have cared.

When they fit a diesel to this (and having engineered RHD, they surely must), Mustang fans will howl in pain.

CYMR0

3,940 posts

201 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
In fact, they could have just called it a Capri without any changes.



That's a 1980 Mercury Capri...



... and that's a barely any different 1980 Mustang (both with turbo four-bangers by the way).

Meanwhile a 1978 Mercury Capri is just a federalized Ford Capri.

If an Escape can be called a Kuga and a Fusion can be called a Mondeo, this could easily have been a Capri. Yes, it's a lot bigger than a Capri but it's the size of a Mondeo... and a Capri was the size of a Cortina.

Edited by CYMR0 on Thursday 18th September 21:17


Edited by CYMR0 on Thursday 18th September 21:19

J4CKO

41,604 posts

201 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
Would have been great if Ford had resurrected the Capri name but it would have really needed some differences to make it worthwhile.

As for this being a modern 2.0S, I suppose range wise it is in the middle but not really comparable as it has 3 times the power of a 2.0 Capri and more than twice what a 2.8i had, another 100 on top of a Sierra Cosworth which was the range topper/halo car back then, and this is the eco special ! amazing how far things have come, even accounting for the weight increase its a big power hike and shows how blasé we have got about big power numbers that 310 bhp just gets grudging approval.


CYMR0

3,940 posts

201 months

Thursday 18th September 2014
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
310 bhp just gets grudging approval.
... and yet a 335d (mapped) is the fastest thing in the world, ever, despite similar power and weight.

Yes, I went there, but I do think that there is something 'uncool' about the fact that it's American that puts people off.