I never turn my engine off at petrol stations!

I never turn my engine off at petrol stations!

Author
Discussion

matty6660

Original Poster:

65 posts

127 months

Monday 22nd September 2014
quotequote all
TREMAiNE said:
hehe I like the part where the OP says there is also a 2.6L version after someone corrected him saying it's a 1.3!

It's hilarious seeing someone know so little after thinking they know so much. We've all been there at one stage though.
why does it say 2616cc on the log book

otolith

56,147 posts

204 months

Monday 22nd September 2014
quotequote all
Because the DVLA disagree with Mazda on how the displacement of a wankel engine is calculated. Simple as that.

TheAllSeeingPie

865 posts

135 months

Monday 22nd September 2014
quotequote all
Because the rotors form 3 combustion chambers and in use one will be combusting and the other exhausting, whereas a conventional piston only has one chamber. So the 2600cc is the total volume of 2/3rds of the available chamber space. Mazda disagree and say that each rotor = 1 piston therefore they measure 1/3rd of the available chamber space.

Daston

6,075 posts

203 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2014
quotequote all
However I do like when the DVLA get it wrong...or right, my RX7 is 1299cc on the log book smile cheap tax

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

213 months

Tuesday 23rd September 2014
quotequote all
matty6660 said:
why does it say 2616cc on the log book
It's definitely a 1.3.

matty6660

Original Poster:

65 posts

127 months

Thursday 25th September 2014
quotequote all
sparks_E39 said:
It's definitely a 1.3.
"The actual "full" displacement of a 13B is 3.9L, but that is from 1 full rotation of the 2 rotors. **But** 1 full rotation of the rotors turns the crankshaft (or properly called an "eccentric" shaft on a rotary) *3* times.

Since a piston engine rates it's displacement based on 1 rotation of the crank, Mazda follows suit and rates the rotary by 1 crank revolution... so 1/3 of 3.9L is 1.3L.

From a power output perspective it's really a 2.6L as you get twice as many "power-strokes" from a rotary then from a piston engine. This is why rotary engines are so powerful compared to its size."

https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20...