Clio Renaultsport 200 Turbo: PH Fleet
Could the Juke NISMO RS prove an unlikely saviour for the much criticised Clio?
Last week I got the chance to jump straight out of the Clio and into the driver's seat of an MY14 GT-R. And discovered the disappointing truth that it's a load of twaddle. Both are mounted to the steering column, rather than the wheel itself, for example. And they do share a broadly comparable angel wings shape. But while one pivots with weight and purpose, travels just a few millimetres and signals the selection of a new gear with an unambiguous click, the other swings a good deal further and lacks any kind of haptic feedback. Need I say which one's which?
On paper they both promise similar shift times - 150 milliseconds in Race mode for the Clio - but the reality is night and day. For the Clio, it's the upshifts that really trip it up, stalling the all-important swell of progress. And the fact that you have to pull the paddle that bit further, and there's nothing to tell you the shift has been registered, doesn't help.
This is hardly news, of course. A tediously repetitive chorus has followed this Clio Renaulsport around from its launch, now over a year and a half ago. Almost every review has sung the same lyric - "With a few tweaks it could be a great car," or words to that effect. The equally chastised 197 only lasted a year before the F1 R27 was wheeled out, with a host of revisions, to answer the critics. So surely Renault must have an update brewing for the 200? To those seeking clues, official channels have nodded in the direction of the recently announced Nissan Juke NISMO RS. This, remember, shares the same engine with the Clio 200. OK, so it's got a ridiculous name, and it's basically a hot hatch in Cuban heels, but touched by the hands of NISMO it now has 215hp (the Clio has 200hp), 210lb ft of torque (up 33lb ft), a mechanical limited-slip differential and some Recaro seats. And where have we heard that recipe used before? Better still, the Nissan even gets a manual gearbox. Now we're talking.
So what are the chances of all, or any, of this coming to the Clio 200? Well, we can but hope. But going on past experience, whatever the details turn out to be, at least we shouldn't have to wait much longer to find out.
FACT SHEET
Car: Clio Renaultsport 200 Turbo EDC LUX
Run by: Danny Milner
On fleet since: April 2014
Mileage: 8,485
List price new: £21,835 (Basic list of £19,995 plus £650 for Cup Chassis, £300 for 18-inch Renaultsport wheels and Dunlop Sport Maxx RT tyres, £595 for Flame Red i.d. metallic paint, £295 for Renaultsport Monitor)
Last month at a glance: Comparisons with hot Nissans offer hope of future improvements
Previous updates:
Clio arrives on the PH Fleet; faces an uphill struggle for popular opinion
PH 'accidentally' ends up in an impromptu Clio Cup race at Spa
Danny heads to Scotland in search of the Clio's hidden depths
Found - the Clio's wild side
Clio battles its Peugeot nemesis for Danny's affection
So, the Clio wants to be grown-up and mature - is it?
The car is now sitting at around 1,500 miles and is starting to "bed in" nicely. It's quick enough and certainly feels quicker than the old 197/200 albeit I do recognise that is mostly down to the low down torque. Also, I have found the gearbox to be perfectly reasonably. It's my first experience of a dual clutch type set up and I do agree with the reviews that it is probably this cars weak point although I do not believe it is anywhere near as bad as people are trying to suggest. I have found that running mine in race mode constantly provides the fastest shifts (which are almost instant in all gears save for the change from 1st to 2nd which does seem to "hang" a little) and also frees up a little extra sound from the exhaust. It also allows for the best economy since you are completely in control of the upshifts and only sacrifice the traction and stability control which, realistically, are not essential in a car with 200hp, especially one with such solid handling.
To put it into perspective, I do around 18,000 (or so) miles a year and the old 200 (and my R26 Megane) provided around 26-27mpg. This car, driven in a similar manner, returns 31(+) and that's even whilst it is still being run in. As such, from a cost perspective this car already stacks up more. I appreciate others who do not do as many miles (or who have more money to throw at a car) may choose something else but I am happy with my choice thus far. If there was such an option, I would have elected to have one with a manual box and, in my opinion, this would rectify most of the issues raised in the reviews and long-term reports. However, for the time-being, I really would recommend trying one as it is much better to live with than you may otherwise believe. It's well specced, handles brilliantly, sounds good (from inside the cabin at least), is more economical than previous models and looks good so long as the cup pack is specced. Others may disagree but I'm glad I have at least given it a try.
I've driven the RS Clio on a number of occassions and I like the EDC box, it will never compete with a manual though. I would personally love a manual Clio with recaros.
I bought my Megane 250 brand new at 26 and was offered a test drive before I even asked.
However, finding a Clio 200T to test drive is pretty much impossible.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff