Honda 4x4s... not actually 4x4

Honda 4x4s... not actually 4x4

Author
Discussion

ChemicalChaos

Original Poster:

10,385 posts

160 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Anyone on here have a Honda soft-roader?

Turns out they've been lying to you!

http://www.carthrottle.com/attention-all-honda-own...

article said:
Teknikens Värld is testing the four-wheel drive system in Sweden’s 20 best-selling SUVs. Honda CR-V proves once again that its system doesn’t deliver what it promises.

Last year Teknikens Värld tested the 4WD system in Honda CR-V. We then discovered that Honda’s 4WD system didn’t perform well at all. The system overheated when the surface was slippery. The CR-V wasn’t able to drive uphill when the traction was poor. The front wheels were just spinning and the rear wheels were not moving at all.
Honda explained that is was a built-in functionality to spare the mechanical parts of the system. But Honda did listen to our criticism and they shortly after offered all their customers in Sweden a software update to eliminate the problem.
We then tested the CR-V again with the updated software and the problem with the 4WD system was gone. CR-V was now able to run up the hill on the slippery surface.

We have now performed the same test again, now with Honda CR-V model year 2015. As you can see in the movie above the problem is back. The CR-V is not able to climb uphill when the front wheels have no friction. The rear wheels are once again not moving. After 15-20 seconds the CR-V instead slides off the low friction rolls.

Our test method with low friction rolls was approved by Honda last year. The method, which is very realistic, has also been adopted by some automakers, such as Subaru.

As you can see from the video at the top of this page, the 4x4 system clearly isn’t doing what it should be; the front wheels spin furiously, while the rears do nothing to help drive the car forward. The demonstration with the Ford Kuga model highlights the Honda’s shortcomings.

We spoke to Honda UK earlier today, but are yet to receive a statement. If the software fault does affect UK and European models, a recall to update the system could prove very costly.
Software fault? The cynical side of me thinks they've actually just been badging up cars with 2wd gearboxes....

Matt UK

17,686 posts

200 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Brilliant hehe

Honda marketing:
We have made a rough tough 4x4 that can cope with Armageddon. But to product wear and tear we've added some functionality which, errr, sort of, errr, ensures its never in 4x4 mode. Anyway, enjoy the high up drving position, gotta dash...

Kawasicki

13,077 posts

235 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Some of these part time 4 wheel drive cars are interesting. Front driveshafts twice the diameter of the rears. Hmmm.

jackh707

2,126 posts

156 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
The original Mk1 CRV was quite good in comparison.

No electronic goodies and a good old fashioned viscous coupling, front wheels slip... Sends drive to the rear, key is to keep your foot in and keep the fronts spinning on slippery surfaces. biggrin Suprisingly fun at oversteer in a snowy car park or at the beach. Loved mine, far more capable than the newer ones.

Truckosaurus

11,249 posts

284 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Also, completely open diffs all round on a lot of 4wd cars/SUVs so if one wheel has no grip (eg. in bad snow) then it will spin away with no drive to the other 3.

the_lone_wolf

2,622 posts

186 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Am the only one imagining this throughout the entire commentary of the video?

Especially when he starts getting excited...



biggrin

Pixelpeep7r

8,600 posts

142 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
might reserve comment as unsure how my 4motion would cope with that test...

Such a shame for honda though - the CRV is actually a nice car to drive.

rovermorris999

5,199 posts

189 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Should have bought a Forester.

mosstrooper

317 posts

231 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Similar test showing the same shortcomings has been around since 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwr5_Sd47Us

Uncle John

4,283 posts

191 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
I had a mk2 CRV with the part time 4wd and during a heavy bout of snow it got me up a closed off road, closed because it was treachorous, no problems at all.

I was pretty impressed!

ChemicalChaos

Original Poster:

10,385 posts

160 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
mosstrooper said:
Similar test showing the same shortcomings has been around since 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwr5_Sd47Us
As said in the article, because Honda were SUPPOSED to have fixed it

BugLebowski

1,033 posts

116 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
I prefer my 4x4's that have no capacity for "software updates" thank you very much! also Honda are responsible for some of the worst 4x4s ever.....


kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
I don't think you'll find any modern car, 4x4 or not, which has no capacity for software updates.

divetheworld

2,565 posts

135 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Just as sheeite as my old Q5. One wheel on the loose stuff and it gives up.

jep

1,183 posts

209 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Apparently Honda UK have responded....

Honda UK said:
Honda’s AWD system uses a compact, lightweight and fuel efficient rear differential. Due to this construction, certain torque limits are set to enable the unit to perform effectively in real world conditions, while not exceeding the overall strength of the unit.

In real world conditions, regardless of the surface, some amount of friction is available to both front and rear wheels. The AWD system allocates driving torque to the front and rear wheels in order to achieve the best possible driving force, whilst keeping within the torque limits of the rear differential.

In the roller test shown this time, the front wheels have zero friction and the rear wheels have unlimited grip, therefore if all available torque required to move the vehicle uphill was transferred to the rear differential, the torque limit of the unit would be exceeded. Because the torque is limited as described above, the vehicle will not climb the slope in this test condition.

If the vehicle is continued to operate in this condition (front wheels spinning and rear wheels stationary) after some time the system detects high slip and reduces the available torque to the rear wheels to prevent overheating and therefore the vehicle moves back down the slope.

Again, in real world conditions, this situation is highly unlikely. Normally front and rear wheels will be spinning to a similar degree, therefore front or rear slip is small and overheat protection will not be required.

Therefore our opinion is that the CR-V Realtime AWD system performance cannot be verified using this type of test and the result is as expected from the system. However as we demonstrated on 26th March 2013 at Harads together with Teknikens Värld, the actual performance of the system in real world conditions was “very effective”.
I can think of a number of times when I've first moved the car in the snow and my fronts could spin whereas my rears are on snow-free tarmac under the car....

I think I'm gonna stick with my Land Rover, thanks....

cptsideways

13,544 posts

252 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
Funny how all the new CRV's are now fitted with winter tyres as standard, no doubt so customers won't notice when it snows. If you've seen the size of the drive shafts you'll realize they couldn't provide much torque.

Four wheel drive or four wheels with some drive hehe


The Volvo's suffer a similar fate in those tests.

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
divetheworld said:
Just as sheeite as my old Q5. One wheel on the loose stuff and it gives up.
Yet strangely, the Passat did pretty well in the video above. Isn't it the same 4WD system, pretty much, or is the Q5 based on the A4 platform rather than MQB?

BugLebowski

1,033 posts

116 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
I don't think you'll find any modern car, 4x4 or not, which has no capacity for software updates.
I mean software updates that affect how the 4x4 system works, i.e. a fully mechanical 4x4 system.

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
BugLebowski said:
kambites said:
I don't think you'll find any modern car, 4x4 or not, which has no capacity for software updates.
I mean software updates that affect how the 4x4 system works, i.e. a fully mechanical 4x4 system.
Don't all modern SUVs have electronic differential control, then?

BugLebowski

1,033 posts

116 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
Don't all modern SUVs have electronic differential control, then?
Actually you might be right, Im thinking of pick ups/defenders and the like.