RE: Volvo V60 Polestar: Review

RE: Volvo V60 Polestar: Review

Author
Discussion

jdleeso

71 posts

284 months

Friday 31st October 2014
quotequote all
I think we have to consider the used price as well. 2014 D6 for 33K, being 6 months old with less than 10K miles. I agree £47K (with government 5k discount) for a new D6 doesn't make a practical personal purchase.

I agree its also good see some fast AWD estates appearing rather than SUVs.

Basil Hume

1,267 posts

252 months

Friday 31st October 2014
quotequote all
Based on experience, Volvos seem to have high initial depreciation followed by a much more gentle fall; they are far from unique in this regard. I imagine that the purchasers of the V60 Polestar would be likely to keep theirs for longer than this matters.

I had a 2012 V60 D5 SE Lux for 18 months, after some Audis. It was lovely way to travel and of very, very high quality. I'd love another and especially a Polestar.

I concur with what an ealier poster said: that modern Volvos are everything that Audi purport to be.

pSyCoSiS

3,594 posts

205 months

Friday 31st October 2014
quotequote all
Modern day equivalent of the 850 T5-R? (well, sort of!).

Like it very much and fair play to Volvo for putting it into production.

redwedge

2,430 posts

166 months

Sunday 2nd November 2014
quotequote all
yonex said:
If Audi can sell RS's.....
I don't understand why people spend so much money on fast Audis either.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 2nd November 2014
quotequote all
redwedge said:
yonex said:
If Audi can sell RS's.....
I don't understand why people spend so much money on fast Audis either.
is it any different to spending so much on a fast BMW or Mercedes?

gary71

1,967 posts

179 months

Monday 3rd November 2014
quotequote all
pSyCoSiS said:
Modern day equivalent of the 850 T5-R? (well, sort of!).

Like it very much and fair play to Volvo for putting it into production.
Very similar. Volvo tie in with race team road car engineering offshoot. TWR first, now Polestar.

braddo

10,466 posts

188 months

Monday 3rd November 2014
quotequote all
MonkeyMatt said:
yonex said:
MonkeyMatt said:
This is no RS rival, its about on par with an Audi S4 or a BMW 335 but much more expensive! an RS4 or BMW M3 would leave it for dead! It does have some appeal though.
Really, I guess you have also driven one?

I'd prefer a bit of V60 and a Caterham, rather than an RS6...it would also mean I would be able to drive without a paper bag on my head wink
I don't need to drive one to know an RS4 or an M3 would leave it for dead
Autocar's test had the V60 lapping their wet circuit within a few tenths of the RS4.

The gap was bigger on the dry circuit, but it's hardly being left for dead in either case.

After_Shock

8,751 posts

220 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
tinnes said:
BMW 335 DIESEL X DRIVE TOURING, cheaper, faster, more economical. although i could have been sold on the polestar, there was so much about it i liked.
So you bought a like for like car? Hardly.

If you liked it so much why not get a demo elsewhere?

After_Shock

8,751 posts

220 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
jdleeso said:
I think we have to consider the used price as well. 2014 D6 for 33K, being 6 months old with less than 10K miles. I agree £47K (with government 5k discount) for a new D6 doesn't make a practical personal purchase.

I agree its also good see some fast AWD estates appearing rather than SUVs.
However if its a company purchase the ability to write the cost of the vehicle off through tax benefits does make it rather unique in that sector.

Raify

6,552 posts

248 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
Apologies in advance for being a spelling pedant and/or annoying proof reader, but there's an irritating "egg-corn" in the article.

If Volvo want to save money on components they would scrimp on something. If they're talking about tiny bikinis then it's skimp(y).




scherzkeks

4,460 posts

134 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
Raify said:
Apologies in advance for being a spelling pedant and/or annoying proof reader, but there's an irritating "egg-corn" in the article.

If Volvo want to save money on components they would scrimp on something. If they're talking about tiny bikinis then it's skimp(y).
This will be the first time I defend the editorial quality of a PH piece, but the words are interchangeable. redface

Raify

6,552 posts

248 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
scherzkeks said:
Raify said:
Apologies in advance for being a spelling pedant and/or annoying proof reader, but there's an irritating "egg-corn" in the article.

If Volvo want to save money on components they would scrimp on something. If they're talking about tiny bikinis then it's skimp(y).
This will be the first time I defend the editorial quality of a PH piece, but the words are interchangeable. redface
n


Really? I didn't know that, only ever heard skimp(y) just before bikini or other items of clothing...

Carry on, back to expensive and fast Volvos.

T4RRR

206 posts

219 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
Well, I've got the car for the week so will post my impressions of it after the weekend. If you see me in the Bristol / Bath area give me a wave! wavey




anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
T4RRR said:
Well, I've got the car for the week so will post my impressions of it after the weekend. If you see me in the Bristol / Bath area give me a wave! wavey



Looking at those pics the front splitter looks like an add on rather than part of the main bumper, I would have expected it to have a bespoke bumper at that price as it looks a bit aftermarket. How does it look in real life?

T4RRR

206 posts

219 months

Tuesday 4th November 2014
quotequote all
That would be down to my crappy photo taking skills! biggrin

It is a bespoke unit and unique to this model from what I can see.

rob.e

2,861 posts

278 months

Thursday 6th November 2014
quotequote all
I love the look/colour and the polestar-ness of this very much, but i just can't get past that price. £50k is just nuts IMO.

Its going to makes the new golf R estate look good value if it comes in at the expected £30k level (.. plus they have yet to actually announce they're really going to make it).

Or even better, that 280ps octavia vrs concept that's been snapped at the 'ring - i'd bet that would be late 20s. Ok, its not got the polestar's ultimate poke but its not far off, at about have the price.

norchi

351 posts

222 months

Thursday 6th November 2014
quotequote all
Eight, yes eight on 'autotrader' and even one on ebay believe it or not, all around 'list'

The dealers who fell for the BS at this greedy and unrealistic price and paid for them up front will no doubt be figuring a way to get them out of the back gate at £35,000 or less, if they are lucky.

Don.

OliilO

198 posts

137 months

Saturday 8th November 2014
quotequote all
Saw one of these between Wallingford and Reading today, looked very tidy in the blue colour. Unfortunately in slowish traffic so no opportunity to stretch its legs.

Having used a V70 that work owns, that is very comfortableto to waft around in, I'd definitely consider one of these second hand if they depreciate some.

Edited by OliilO on Saturday 8th November 19:16

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Saturday 8th November 2014
quotequote all
It looks superb and sounds very interesting. It's about time that Volvo got back on form!

RenesisEvo

Original Poster:

3,608 posts

219 months

Saturday 8th November 2014
quotequote all
shout T4RRR

How are getting on with it?