Would you swerve?

Author
Discussion

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

242 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
I live in Spain where you get a lot of stray cats. They're all over the place and I live in the country so you get even more.

This morning a sodding stray cat decided to perform a leap of death in front of my car. Luckily I swerved in time but it meant I hit the kerb damaging my alloy and also knocking the wheel out of alignment. Alloy refurb is quoted at about €50-€60 and I'm getting the alignment sorted out tonight for a further €50. Total damage is about €110 so I'm pretty pissed off about it.

I'm beginning to regret swerving in the first place although I would have felt terrible hitting the cat too.

I'm just wondering how many other people would have swerved or rather just hit the cat? (That would probably damage the car too mind).

robinessex

11,068 posts

182 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Aim at the cat. By the time you get there, it will be gone.

rich83

14,252 posts

139 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
As above, and if you hit it..... "C'est la vie"........ as they say in Spain!!

Truckosaurus

11,332 posts

285 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Rule #1: If it is smaller than a cow, hit it.

You see many more stories in the paper about people who die in crashes where they have swerved and lost control than you ever see injuries from hitting wildlife (in the UK, at least)

TheRoadWarrior

1,241 posts

179 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
"Aim for teh Cat dude, aim for the cat!"

"I'm trying evil-Ted, I'm trying!"

  1. Station

Jon1967x

7,232 posts

125 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Difficult - anything can do damage - a pheasant can damage a grill and bodywork pretty badly as a guy found out on the aston sub forum, but then a head on with a lorry coming the other way is worse. I tend to hit the brakes and risk getting rear ended

phil1979

3,560 posts

216 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
The driving gods on here will say aim for the cat.

The truth is, that, when startled (be it a cat, dog, kid etc), your natural reaction is to avoid it.

I found this only recently, when a cat darted out from the bushes. I did not have time to think "It's smaller than a cow, therefore plough on".

Instead, I thought 'st', hit the brakes, and tried to steer away from it.

Nothing I could have done to have stopped that reaction, in my opinion.

Oldandslow

2,405 posts

207 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Yep, rational argument and the Highway code say plough on as if it wasn't there but you natural reaction is to swerve or slow. Hard to fight those reflexes.

I gave the OH and the minihers a scare the other night avoiding a bunny on the motorway. In the split second it appeared in the headlights the car jumped 2 feet sideways with almost no thought from me.

BigGingerBob

1,701 posts

191 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
phil1979 said:
The driving gods on here will say aim for the cat.

The truth is, that, when startled (be it a cat, dog, kid etc), your natural reaction is to avoid it.

I found this only recently, when a cat darted out from the bushes. I did not have time to think "It's smaller than a cow, therefore plough on".

Instead, I thought 'st', hit the brakes, and tried to steer away from it.

Nothing I could have done to have stopped that reaction, in my opinion.
I agree.
I braked for a pheasant that ran in front of the car the other day. Probably wasn't the best move but it happened pretty much instinctively.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
I agree that the natural reaction is to swerve, but if there was a car coming the other way or you were in a town with pedestrians on the the pavement, then i'm afraid the cat should get splatted.

Blaster72

10,883 posts

198 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
robinessex said:
Aim at the cat. By the time you get there, it will be gone.
Someones been watching Days of Thunder rofl

knitware

1,473 posts

194 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
I manoeuvred my car to avoided a chuffing mouse last night...

CAPP0

19,604 posts

204 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
phil1979 said:
Nothing I could have done to have stopped that reaction, in my opinion.
It is possible to train yourself out of natural reactions, takes time and effort. On a bike, for instance, if you run off the road onto a verge you have to be able to resist the urge to brake (which is 100% guaranteed to dump you on your arse) and let the bike run if you want any chance of saving it. It's possible, a "mate of mine" wink managed to overcome this and save just such a situation.

To be clear, I am not however advocating catricide tongue out

DrDoofenshmirtz

15,246 posts

201 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Anyone who says they wouldn't try to avoid hitting any animal is either:
1] lying.
2] A .

Any normal person would swerve/hit the brakes/do whatever to avoid the hit - it's a perfectly normal natural reaction.

Petrol Only

1,593 posts

176 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
I don't swerve. Two pheasants stuffed in the mx5 grill. Both occasions swerving meant bush/ditch oncoming head on with shiny metal. Bonus pheasant for dinner both times.

cat darted infront of car BRAKE. Stopped dead on its head. Poor bugger.

But if something hits the windscreen can't help but duck hehe

Edited by Petrol Only on Tuesday 25th November 11:34

BorkFactor

7,266 posts

159 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
I have only faced similar situations a few times, and I tend to brake and not swerve.

My thinking is that swerving into oncoming traffic or onto the pavement is a very bad idea unless the area is clearly extremely quiet.

I was in a car with someone who swerved into the pavement and almost hit someone because of a bloody dog! Very scary.

B'stard Child

28,450 posts

247 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
DrDoofenshmirtz said:
Anyone who says they wouldn't try to avoid hitting any animal is either:
1] lying.
2] A .

Any normal person would swerve/hit the brakes/do whatever to avoid the hit - it's a perfectly normal natural reaction.
Brake yes

Swerve no

beanbag

Original Poster:

7,346 posts

242 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Regarding the natural reaction, you're probably spot on. I'm just pissed off as the alloys are brand new and have been on the car for less than a couple of months... frown

The kerbing goes around half the entire wheel as I had to swerve and then steer heavily to the left as the road went around that way. I guess I'll just be sure to set my dogs on the sodding thing when I go out for a walk next time.

9mm

3,128 posts

211 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Do you think HGV drivers stamp on the brake or swerve?

PistonBroker

2,422 posts

227 months

Tuesday 25th November 2014
quotequote all
Early on in my driving career I span my old dear's 1.2 Corsa when I swerved to avoid a rabbit. As I sat on the other side of the road, facing the way I'd just been, I decided I wouldn't do that again.

As an earlier poster has said, I find aiming for the animal seems to work well, though SWMBO's screaming can get annoying if she's in the car!