RE: Land Rover Discovery Sport: Driven
Discussion
RenOHH said:
The interior is okay for the place the car occupies in the range. But it doesn't match the exterior promise at all. Really silly mistake, because Audi sell a lot of cars by the look and feel of their interiors. A lot of people will still buy a Q3/Q5 because of this I think.
My girlfriend still wants an evoque, doesn't like the photos of the DS much at all... so I guess the image conscious buyers who like fashion products & 'cute' stuff will continue to get the evoque regardless of this.
RenOHH said:
The interior is okay for the place the car occupies in the range. But it doesn't match the exterior promise at all. Really silly mistake...
Sheepshanks said:
RenOHH said:
The interior is okay for the place the car occupies in the range. But it doesn't match the exterior promise at all. Really silly mistake...
I find the price hike of at least €10k over the Freelander 2 hard to stomach when, despite LR's constant attempts to claim otherwise, it is essentially a replacement for the Freelander (as the interior so clearly proves)
I'm disappointed that its not a little more useable for actual sports! I'm not surprised though. My car interior is covered in mud from the weekends sports and travelling back from rugby with three players covered in mud. I really wouldn't want to find out how this interior would stand up to that on regular basis.
I do like the look, it probably is enough 4x4, it just needs to be a little more discovery and a little less pansy.
I do like the look, it probably is enough 4x4, it just needs to be a little more discovery and a little less pansy.
Personally I think it looks great. Inside and out. Everything about it feels really chunky and solid. Modern interior with everything you'd expect.
I was really impressed with the handling. Did some quite aggressive manoeuvres in one and it behaved admirably. The completely new integral link rear suspension setup probably has something to do with that.
I'd have one, if I was after that sort of thing....
I would like a Jag XE S though!
I was really impressed with the handling. Did some quite aggressive manoeuvres in one and it behaved admirably. The completely new integral link rear suspension setup probably has something to do with that.
I'd have one, if I was after that sort of thing....
I would like a Jag XE S though!
ProBodge said:
Personally I think it looks great. Inside and out. Everything about it feels really chunky and solid. Modern interior with everything you'd expect.
I was really impressed with the handling. Did some quite aggressive manoeuvres in one and it behaved admirably. The completely new integral link rear suspension setup probably has something to do with that.
I'd have one, if I was after that sort of thing....
I would like a Jag XE S though!
I've sat and kicked the tyres of of a couple of them at gatherings but didn't realise they were at the dealers now for public test drives. Must get myself along to my local dealer then.I was really impressed with the handling. Did some quite aggressive manoeuvres in one and it behaved admirably. The completely new integral link rear suspension setup probably has something to do with that.
I'd have one, if I was after that sort of thing....
I would like a Jag XE S though!
Sheepshanks said:
monamimate said:
Except that, similarly equipped, a DS is the same price as an Evoque...
I meant that (some) people will buy DS rather than a RRS, or even a FFRR.I can't imagine very many people struggling to decide between Evoque and DS - Evoque is much less practical inside.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff