RE: All new Ford GT - Detroit 2015

RE: All new Ford GT - Detroit 2015

Author
Discussion

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
It has managed to retain the look of a Ford GT, faintly, but I love the last Ford GT and dislike the exterior and interior of this.

I'll take a Corvette Z06 though. V8. 650hp. Luggage space.

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
there is no way this car will be anything like 250k. The whole point is 'faster than the Ferrari for half the money'.

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
It has managed to retain the look of a Ford GT, faintly, but I love the last Ford GT and dislike the exterior and interior of this.

I'll take a Corvette Z06 though. V8. 650hp. Luggage space.
Yep, see my query above - I know it was an homage to the original GT40, but on the GT, the lack of luggage space seemed a bit "un-GT" in terms of how the term is usually understood, And in a product pitched against Ferraris, Astons et al.

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
Burwood said:
there is no way this car will be anything like 250k. The whole point is 'faster than the Ferrari for half the money'.
...bit like a Corvette then....which will probably still be half the cost of the Ford.

Macadoodle

828 posts

133 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
Love the way Ford has just rolled up their sleeves, flipped the bird at the established supercar makers and rocked up in this (just like they did with the GT40 and GT). Blue collar/working class anti-bullsh!t at its best clap

Haven't got a problem with the name - the way I see it, GT just means top of the Ford tree. Like others, I'm a little disappointed that there's no V8 - couldn't they have stuck one in there and just bunged an Ecoboost sticker on it? hehe

Going on previous form, it will be epic. Can't wait to read about it.

Gettoff

1,434 posts

207 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
I'm struggling to see how a £100k-£200k+ car is blue collar/working class confusedsmile

The old GT was a stunner, primarily due to the fact it was near as dammit a GT40 with a couple of tweaks. By all accounts it was a cracking drive too which, combined with the retro looks home run, made it the success it was.

This new one to me looks pretty bloody awful, especially from the back, but then again, most modern supercars do look iffy anyway. This combined with the V6 could count against it, powerful though it is, it just seems the wrong engine for the type of car. Still, at least it's not as bad as an i8.

Saying that, I hope they sell a few. It's certainly not dull and it always gives me pleasure to see a supercar out and about being used in these modern times, even if it isn't what I would choose.

Macadoodle

828 posts

133 months

Tuesday 13th January 2015
quotequote all
Gettoff said:
I'm struggling to see how a £100k-£200k+ car is blue collar/working class confusedsmile
Well, yes. Maybe not the price, but certainly the attitude. I'm working class and I'd buy one biggrin

g3org3y

20,627 posts

191 months

Wednesday 14th January 2015
quotequote all
Looks epic. Much better looking than the NSX imo. cool

Interior is a mess though. Buttons all over the shop, doesn't look particularly ergonomic to me. frown

Leggy

1,019 posts

222 months

Wednesday 14th January 2015
quotequote all
Ticks the most important super car feature - wall poster looks.
When it looks this awesome who cares how it drives.
I remember Lambo Countach posters everywhere when I was a kid. Never a great drivers car but never forgotten.
Ford brand occupies an rare place where it gets respect rather than jealousy for its performance cars. I remember it when I had my Cossie.

aeropilot

34,600 posts

227 months

Wednesday 14th January 2015
quotequote all
Leggy said:
Ford brand occupies an rare place where it gets respect rather than jealousy for its performance cars.
Greatest name in motorsport helps.

More wins and championships in more disciplines than other maker most probably.

F1 (still only 2nd to Ferrari for engine wins)
The legend that Formula Ford has become over the decades.
Sportscar racing incl multiple Lemans wins
Rallying and rallycross
Saloon/Touring car racing
NASCAR
Drag racing

etc.,etc



vanschpunk

143 posts

212 months

Wednesday 14th January 2015
quotequote all
For the haters who say "why isnt this a V8 like the last GT and the GT40!?? Its a supercar!""

Yes its a supercar, a modern supercar. Its not a modern V8 and/or hybrid "hypercar"!! Its a succeeder to the GT, not a follow on from the old GT. He new Ferrari 458 is "downsizing" to a V6 T too. Where is the haters there!? Suppose its not a "real Ferrari" also??

Some folk do not like change and unfortunately change is needed, as variety is the spice of life after all!!

Even if the GT had of had a 900bhp V8 TT but was still automatic, people would still complain its not a real GT. Lol

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Burwood said:
there is no way this car will be anything like 250k. The whole point is 'faster than the Ferrari for half the money'.
...bit like a Corvette then....which will probably still be half the cost of the Ford.
thumbup

Richie200

2,011 posts

209 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
daytona365 said:
Yet another world class absolutely spiffing GT from America at a vaguely affordable price ?...................Shouldn't be allowed !
Yup. Would Sir like piss on his Ferrari chips?
PMSL that sir, is the work of genius; keep it up wink

sjc

13,964 posts

270 months

Saturday 17th January 2015
quotequote all
MustardCutter said:
steveirl said:
MustardCutter said:
Stunning. Hopefully better engineered and screwed together better than the last one, lol.
Not sure where you are coming from with this comment. Build and engineering integrity of the GT was immense, and the most reliable car I have ever owned.
IIRC Clarkson's rarely worked and they gave him his money back. Also google: http://www.caranddriver.com/news/at-ford-a-superca...
It's Clarkson FFS.
I dare say you believe everything he says about Audi's, and that Falklands number plate as well.And Rovers.And that everyone cross continent jaunt they do over 9 million miles always ends up nigh on a dead heat.



k-ink

9,070 posts

179 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
The number of idiots who believe a word Clarkson has to say is mind boggling. He is an entertainer with an amusing script and no more. If you want to know what a car is really like follow Chris Harris, Harry Metcalfe or similar.

noble12345

362 posts

216 months

Sunday 18th January 2015
quotequote all
Chris Harris, Harry Metcalfe and Steve Sutcliffe, now thats where my £145.50 TV Tax "Licence" should be going! I and everyone i know are SO bored of these badly scripted, ham acted "holidays" with a few cars thrown in.. And did you see how many "film crew" and clingons went to patagonia?! Seriously BBC give the budget to Harris now!

On the GT, I dont care how its built, an F40 looks like its built from bath sealant and its awesome! Cant wait to see the race version!

The Wookie

13,948 posts

228 months

Monday 19th January 2015
quotequote all
Sorry, I'm going to buck the trend and say that I preferred the old retro pastiche to look at. Looks fussy and awkwardly proportioned to my eyes.

F1GTRUeno

6,354 posts

218 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
noble12345 said:
Chris Harris, Harry Metcalfe and Steve Sutcliffe, now thats where my £145.50 TV Tax "Licence" should be going! I and everyone i know are SO bored of these badly scripted, ham acted "holidays" with a few cars thrown in.. And did you see how many "film crew" and clingons went to patagonia?! Seriously BBC give the budget to Harris now!

On the GT, I dont care how its built, an F40 looks like its built from bath sealant and its awesome! Cant wait to see the race version!
Yes, BBC, get rid of the presenters of one of your biggest shows and turn it into something that for 99% of the country would be an absolute borefest with presenters that nobody cares about other than a hugely small percentage of the population.

Edited by F1GTRUeno on Tuesday 20th January 02:11

RDMcG

19,142 posts

207 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
Two cylinders from wonderful

GavinPearson

5,715 posts

251 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
F1GTRUeno said:
noble12345 said:
Chris Harris, Harry Metcalfe and Steve Sutcliffe, now thats where my £145.50 TV Tax "Licence" should be going! I and everyone i know are SO bored of these badly scripted, ham acted "holidays" with a few cars thrown in.. And did you see how many "film crew" and clingons went to patagonia?! Seriously BBC give the budget to Harris now!

On the GT, I dont care how its built, an F40 looks like its built from bath sealant and its awesome! Cant wait to see the race version!
Yes, BBC, get rid of the presenters of one of your biggest shows and turn it into something that for 99% of the country would be an absolute borefest with presenters that nobody cares about other than a hugely small percentage of the population.

Edited by F1GTRUeno on Tuesday 20th January 02:11
I remember the old Top Gear. It was cancelled because insufficient people watched it. New Top Gear is miles better and the Global Audience viewing figures back this up. It makes money for the BBC, funding programmes that nobody really watch that get critical acclaim from obscure interests.

Chris Harris, Harry Metcalfe and Steve Sutcliffe are great print journalists and should stick to their day jobs.