RE: NSX worth the wait? PH Blog

RE: NSX worth the wait? PH Blog

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
This is a surprise to you? You haven't noticed manufacturers advertising on things, and sponsoring things, and going racing?

Seriously?
Yes, especially when a manufacturer like Porsche cant seem to deliver on engine reliability and there are still a shedload of people on a waiting list. Still, we'll see Porsche vs Honda in F1 this year......oh.

mikEsprit

828 posts

187 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
hondansx said:
mikEsprit said:
StottyEvo said:
I could be wrong (as I wasn't around when it was released) but I get the impression that the original NSX wasn't appreciated at the time. Very simple looks, 270bhp & 1345kg with 0-62 taking 6secs.

When the new car is driven, who knows, dynamically it could be absolutely phenomenal and I hope it is.
The original was appreciated at the time, especially by the magazines.

As an Esprit fan, I think the original NSX was ill proportioned, ugly, and soulless. It might be my least favorite exotic ever. However, it has its fans and has from the beginning.
Would love you to expand on soulless...
Its raison d'être never seemed to be about excitement, looks, flash, impact, etc., all of the things that an exotic sports car was supposed to be, imo. Instead, it was focused on reliability, daily drivability, and other characteristics associated with Honda. Like a girl entering a beauty contest, but focusing on the talent segment.

I've never driven one and don't want to, so my opinion is what it is. Had it not characterized itself as an exotic, perhaps my opinion would be different.

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

174 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
frm70 said:


Just managed to grab a cancelled order in the first 100, I'll take mine in long beach blue with black interior with blue stitching , thanks.

The more PH'ers slag it off the more I can't wait, roll on next January.
LBB is a cracking colour


therat

138 posts

179 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
frm70 said:


Just managed to grab a cancelled order in the first 100, I'll take mine in long beach blue with black interior with blue stitching , thanks.

The more PH'ers slag it off the more I can't wait, roll on next January.
THats great news are you in the UK ?

EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

136 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
mikEsprit said:
Its raison d'être never seemed to be about excitement, looks, flash, impact, etc., all of the things that an exotic sports car was supposed to be, imo. Instead, it was focused on reliability, daily drivability, and other characteristics associated with Honda. Like a girl entering a beauty contest, but focusing on the talent segment.

I've never driven one and don't want to, so my opinion is what it is. Had it not characterized itself as an exotic, perhaps my opinion would be different.
Really? Suggest you reread the reviews of the time as to how it drove. That was the #1 goal for Honda.

If you're saying that you choose not to drive a car that reset the benchmarks for driving, I think you're just showing your prejudice. I get that you don't like the way it looks (which is to me understated elegance rather than flash) but to say that you prefer to remain ignorant is a bit un-PH!

DanielSan

18,807 posts

168 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
The NSX is £50k more than the i8.
And one is a proper supercar not a hybrid with sporting pretentions.

stevobeavo

2 posts

112 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
Am I the only one who thinks the gt40 looks absolutely horrid? nothing on the car works in my opinion.

vz-r_dave

Original Poster:

3,469 posts

219 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
vz-r_dave said:
SpeckledJim said:
vz-r_dave said:
SpeckledJim said:
vz-r_dave said:
MarshPhantom said:
The last one was hardly a big hit, despite the links with Senna. Can't see this doing too well.
Why?
Because sales is a function of badge x sex appeal.

Good isn't really in the equation.

And the links with Senna don't really mean anything. The best chassis engineer in the world is a chap we'll never hear about, but he'll be much better at making a sports car drive well than Ayrton Senna would have been.
Your argument makes no sense when you consider the likes of the GTR which has neither badge kudos (in it's segment) or sex appeal.
The GTR is a perfect example of my argument, thanks, since it has been comfortably outsold by the arguably inferior but better-looking and better-badged Porsche 911.
Ah so your definition of 'not doing very well' is being outsold by a competitor...... ok.. I am sure Nissan's goal for the GTR to was to trump Porsche on sales in it's first 5 years.......
I gather you're desperate for a scrap about this, but to do that you're going to have to take the opposite side.

Which would you say is 'doing' better - the 911 or the GTR?
Porsche but that doesn't mean that the GTR is not a success story, it has done well without 50+ years in the making and without the badge/history of Porsche. So in my eyes the GTR is proof that just because a car lacks the brand kudos and the sex appeal pleasing aesthetics doesn't mean a car will not succeed a manufactures strategic targets what ever that may be.

DanBMW

194 posts

185 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
NSX Looks dull. Not totally convinced on the Ford GT, the design doesn't seem to flow very well.

vz-r_dave

Original Poster:

3,469 posts

219 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
DanBMW said:
NSX Looks dull. Not totally convinced on the Ford GT, the design doesn't seem to flow very well.
Looks dull??? Only on PH!

DanBMW

194 posts

185 months

Thursday 15th January 2015
quotequote all
So sorry. I forgot this is the internet where my opinion is wrong. Going purely on pictures, yes, I think it looks dull.

MB 1

525 posts

186 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
vz-r_dave said:
juicy sushi said:
MB 1 said:
The biggest failing is making it under the Acura brand, and making it in the US.

Massive mistake.
They have a massive engineering and R&D operation in the US, build a lot of their cars there, and have a racetrack very close buy, which they own, and are able to use as needed to develop the car. It made total sense, especially since they're Japanese R&D facilities are spending most of their time focusing on fuel cell development and the like.
PH the forum where people make bold statements without any knowledge what so ever.... thanks for the insight.

Perhaps they are looking to leverage the NSX to boost/introduce the brand into Europe?
With what, a brand with ear zero kudos or heritage outside the U.S.?! biggrin To Japanese car fans, Acura isn't a well respected brand. Also car enthusiasts outside the U.S. view cars from there with a huge amount of caution. I can't think of many US sports cars I'd want to own.

I think it's a big marketing error.

As a potential customer, I'd really struggle buying something with an Acura badge. I truly hope it's released in Europe under the Honda name as per before. I'm not a badge snob at all, I've owned a lot of Japanese cars, and some Lotus and Porsche. But the U.S. connection I don't like.

vz-r_dave

Original Poster:

3,469 posts

219 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
MB 1 said:
vz-r_dave said:
juicy sushi said:
MB 1 said:
The biggest failing is making it under the Acura brand, and making it in the US.

Massive mistake.
They have a massive engineering and R&D operation in the US, build a lot of their cars there, and have a racetrack very close buy, which they own, and are able to use as needed to develop the car. It made total sense, especially since they're Japanese R&D facilities are spending most of their time focusing on fuel cell development and the like.
PH the forum where people make bold statements without any knowledge what so ever.... thanks for the insight.

Perhaps they are looking to leverage the NSX to boost/introduce the brand into Europe?
With what, a brand with ear zero kudos or heritage outside the U.S.?! biggrin To Japanese car fans, Acura isn't a well respected brand. Also car enthusiasts outside the U.S. view cars from there with a huge amount of caution. I can't think of many US sports cars I'd want to own.

I think it's a big marketing error.

As a potential customer, I'd really struggle buying something with an Acura badge. I truly hope it's released in Europe under the Honda name as per before. I'm not a badge snob at all, I've owned a lot of Japanese cars, and some Lotus and Porsche. But the U.S. connection I don't like.
You have to start somewhere right, I am half American and familiar with Acura so it's not such a shocker for me. I am sure Honda's aspiration is to challenge the likes of BMW, Mercedes eventually and I don't see them achieving that with the Honda badge unfortunately.

So such a model would at least put Acura on the mark, the car has mixed reviews but honestly if I saw this driving around London I'd look more than twice so I believe it would be good for the brand. Guess it depends how they market the car in Europe.

Manufactures are so global these days that I don't think it makes a huge difference where the car is built. Certainly in the US where they build the likes of Tesla, BMW, etc. Not sure what the issue is here.


MB 1

525 posts

186 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
I hope you're right.

I'd really like to see it kick some butts, and I'm sure it will. They are probably nervous of a repeat of the last NSX bs Ferrari. It's just for me the H badge means a lot more...

vz-r_dave

Original Poster:

3,469 posts

219 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
MB 1 said:
I hope you're right.

I'd really like to see it kick some butts, and I'm sure it will. They are probably nervous of a repeat of the last NSX bs Ferrari. It's just for me the H badge means a lot more...
I agree, certainly with motorsport heritage which actually now makes me think I am wrong with Acura. Now that they are getting back into F1 surely hey will use that as a launch pad for the NSX and it'll therefore be branded as a Honda.


dinkel

26,959 posts

259 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
I am afraid the NSX comes too late - the NSX magic has faded away and comes from an era when Real Cars were King.

Original NSX was a mini Macca F1 ... a pure drivers car.

greggy50

6,170 posts

192 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
DanBMW said:
NSX Looks dull. Not totally convinced on the Ford GT, the design doesn't seem to flow very well.
Agree it looks dull reminds me of an R8 or something. If I shell out £100k+ on a car I want it to look pretty mental and unique this design just does not do it for me looks very generic and well boring.

Sure it will be a fantastic car to drive but think in this category most of the cars drive far above the average drivers talents and as such the styling goes a very long way in getting cars sold.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

138 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
MarshPhantom said:
The NSX is £50k more than the i8.
And one is a proper supercar not a hybrid with sporting pretentions.
It wasn't me who said they were competitors.

GreenArrow

3,600 posts

118 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
"New NSX, boring Japanese car, not exciting enough for the money, blah, blah, blah...sigh....."

Well I like it. The original NSX was actually criticised for being conservative and boring, when launched against the Ferrari 348 and others, but rose tinted spectacles mean people love them now and think they're wonderful. Funny that when Honda used to shift about 10 a year....

The new Honda NSX appeals to Honda's core values of reliability, usability, etc and will do fine. People buying it will be Audi R8 type customers and there are some similarities In design..

speedjockey

131 posts

137 months

Friday 16th January 2015
quotequote all
The scary thing for me is that the badge and name on the back is the attractive part about the car, (history of the original, racing pedigree, knowledge, companies true capabilities etc etc)yet despite that it's already struggling. So much for the purity aspect too... Should've just started re-producing the original, upped the power a bit and called it quits frankly.

As many have already posted, it pretty much needs to annihilate all Japanese competition for it to regain any desirability it has lost in these many years of development(strange, as I don't usually care for lap times anyways or such often meaningless figures). Here's hoping it sounds good!

Edited by speedjockey on Friday 16th January 23:18