RE: BMW i8 vs The Real World

RE: BMW i8 vs The Real World

Author
Discussion

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
I guess in some ways it's quite technically clever but it seems another of those cars where the initial headlines are really good (100+mpg + super car performance) but the reality to me is, is it really going to be worth stepping out of something like a 911 for?

Ok the 911 won't do amazing mpg but these days I think they offer fairly respectable economy on a motorway cruise and the i8 seems to need a whole lot of 'carefulness' to get good mpg. Would a 911 with the same delicate foot offer pretty good mpg too? (relatively)

When you look at the faff and additional technology just to get the thing to move, I don't see any 'real world' benefit from a conventional modern supercar.

I'm not against technology as such but it does seem marketing and advertising paint one picture and the reality of what it would be like during ownership would be quite different.

garypotter

1,502 posts

150 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
So where do you put the luggage? I believe most owners will have this as a 2nd 3rd or 4th car and will be used for limited miles. Maybe used for the weekend away with the wife/secretary/P.A. but you still need to take an overnight bag.

I have not fallen in love with this car and at over £100,000 i'm oooot!

moffat

1,020 posts

225 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
I think it is really impressive for what it is and I think people forget that this is not an M car.

Will be interesting to see what the M Division's take on the i8 could be.

X5TUU

11,939 posts

187 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
garypotter said:
will be used for limited miles. Maybe used for the weekend away with the wife/secretary/P.A. but you still need to take an overnight bag.
its far too stand out to use for a weekend away with some that's not the missus ... at the moment

those journeys are better left to short term hire cars ... or so I hear lol

chelme

1,353 posts

170 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
erics said:
chelme said:
Well done erics...good move.
An aston v12 v costs 5-6k a year to run including warranty renewal. It rattles like a pig (dashboard mainly), is far from pleasant on long trips like the one to spa for example. It is too heavy for track work.
The i8 will be a different experience.
If you say so erics...

RemarkLima

2,375 posts

212 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
mwstewart said:
You've well and truly lost the thread!
Fair enough, well done you.

erics

2,663 posts

211 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
Fire99 said:
When you look at the faff and additional technology just to get the thing to move, I don't see any 'real world' benefit from a conventional modern supercar.
General cost of ownership is one of them. Keeping anything from a ferrari / aston / mclaren cost a bomb in maintenance and fuel and warranty renewal on a yearly basis. Think £5-6k vs barely £1k.

But that is just a small part of the whole thing. The driving experience is fairly different to anything i have ever driven before.

greygoose

8,260 posts

195 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
moffat said:
I think it is really impressive for what it is and I think people forget that this is not an M car.

Will be interesting to see what the M Division's take on the i8 could be.
I agree, it is a different sort of vehicle.

davea18h

106 posts

124 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
davea18h said:
Felt compelled to write in on this one, especially after the fuel figures which I've seen before.
This car is supposed to be all things.... ie looks, performance and fantastic mpg, with the mpg being the deciding factor as you could have both a sports car of considerable performance and great fuel consumption and free congestion charging to boot if you're in fashionable London!
I think it looks great, has the technology, carbon fibre etc, engine and hybrid technology seems to be great on paper....
But you can get all this for half the price with an Alpina BMW diesel. In some respects BMW should be taken to court over their wildly inaccurate claims of fuel consumption and would be a great test case against other manufacturers making wild claims with regards fuel consumption.
Just a final note... what if Alpina had the i8 and put one of it's sports diesel engines in it? All that lightness and performance would make a formidable machine!
A 3 litre diesel engine is not going to fit or keep the car light.

Taking BMW to court for posting the (correct) official figures that everyone knows don't reflect real world driving? Get real. It's amazing how easily people will throw around allegations of dishonesty. BMW simply publishes the figures that it is required to publish following from tests that it is required to do.
The Alpina thing was purely hypothetical. As for the fuel stats, the average car tested is (approx)anything from 15% to 25% out on average. The BMW is (roughly speaking) 50% to 60% out which is a considerable amount, and probably in the real world, absolutely unobtainable. The point being that manufacturers should be giving more real world figures. As for the performance diesel Alpinas, read the write ups to check on real world performance and average fuel consumption. Steve Sutcliffe recent road tests in Autocar for example. And no they aren't made of carbon fibre, more's the pity. It's a comparison, if it hit 90 to 100 to gallon instaed of the 130 odd I'd be impressed. All that technology, engine downsizing, hybrid, carbon fibre almost seems a waste, except you could argue it's the first of it's kind etc etc. I do think it looks fab inside and out, the technology is fantastic and I love it. But it's supposed to be all things and clearly isn't!

davea18h

106 posts

124 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
EricE said:
Looks just like the frame of the i3 that I had for a few days. As a layman I would not have been able to identify that material as carbon fiber. Even on the i3 it looked a bit cheap because the material seemed fairly soft and had a lot of scruff marks on the door sill.

see: http://www.engadget.com/gallery/bmw-i3-cutaway-and...

The car itself was good and felt very zippy yet relaxing to drive. I want one but the price didn't seem right.
I believe I would feel the same way about the i8 - it's a spectacular car but £100k for a car with a tuned Mini 3-cylinder... no thanks - not yet.

//edit: found something: https://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/showthread.php?t...


Edited by EricE on Monday 19th January 19:38
Obviously hand knitted by some aged frau's who dropped a few stitches in a care home in Bavaria......

erics

2,663 posts

211 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
davea18h said:
The Alpina thing was purely hypothetical. As for the fuel stats, the average car tested is (approx)anything from 15% to 25% out on average. The BMW is (roughly speaking) 50% to 60% out which is a considerable amount, and probably in the real world, absolutely unobtainable. The point being that manufacturers should be giving more real world figures. As for the performance diesel Alpinas, read the write ups to check on real world performance and average fuel consumption. Steve Sutcliffe recent road tests in Autocar for example. And no they aren't made of carbon fibre, more's the pity. It's a comparison, if it hit 90 to 100 to gallon instaed of the 130 odd I'd be impressed. All that technology, engine downsizing, hybrid, carbon fibre almost seems a waste, except you could argue it's the first of it's kind etc etc. I do think it looks fab inside and out, the technology is fantastic and I love it. But it's supposed to be all things and clearly isn't!
If you use the car for short journeys and charge it, then you will easily achieve the claimed figures.

TobesH

550 posts

207 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
Run this as a company car and it's just £ 200 per month BIK for a 40% taxpayer
High residuals also mean some good PCP/Lease deals too.

slippery

14,093 posts

239 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
I've just ordered a Tesla P85D instead.

Pixelpeep7r

8,600 posts

142 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
love the way this is going.

Until the Government realise getting emissions lower mean people use less fuel and that they get less revenue.

0-60 in the 4's and 100+mpg ? yes please all day long and twice on sundays.

If you could get that in a more practical car, and at a third of the price id be in lol smile

danp

1,603 posts

262 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
TobesH said:
Run this as a company car and it's just £ 200 per month BIK for a 40% taxpayer
What would a 100k 911 Carrera S be?

Macboy

739 posts

205 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
danp said:
What would a 100k 911 Carrera S be?
Parkers online tax calculator has a 64 plate 911 C2S at just under £1000/month !

Numeric

1,396 posts

151 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
Not really sure about all of this but was in Norway recently and the place seemed to be awash with Teslas (at least I think that was what they were) colleague said they were the best selling premium car or something like that because of tax breaks etc. Saw one next to those hideous little Gee Whizz things and wow have EVs made a bit of progress.

Could easily see an EV sharing the garage with the wifes fuel glugging BMW once one comes along I actually like (I like the little BMW but that rough sounding extra engine (isn't it a scooter engine made in Thailand or something?) doesn't appeal and I sometimes have to do longer trips)

danp

1,603 posts

262 months

Tuesday 20th January 2015
quotequote all
Macboy said:
Parkers online tax calculator has a 64 plate 911 C2S at just under £1000/month !
Chs, tried it myself, 100k i8 is 166/month, 91k 911 C4S PDK is 1059/month. (at 40% tax rate)

Lowtimer

4,286 posts

168 months

Wednesday 21st January 2015
quotequote all
Pixelpeep7r said:
0-60 in the 4's and 100+mpg ? yes please all day long and twice on sundays.

If you could get that in a more practical car, and at a third of the price id be in lol smile
You won;t get it for a third of the price - that's only 320D money - but I imagine in fairly short order there will be something like an i5 or i6 which will do that sort of job, to compete with the new mid range Tesla.

CRA1G

6,530 posts

195 months

Wednesday 21st January 2015
quotequote all
Do we know of any PH who as actually got one to give a " true" opinion of daily/weekend use.?