RE: Toyota Auris SR180: Unsung hero

RE: Toyota Auris SR180: Unsung hero

Author
Discussion

davamer23

1,127 posts

155 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Mate has one of these in gunmetal, he only paid 5.5k for it last year, 5years old 50k miles with full Toyota history, truly rapid and suits his family needs too. Beats a VAG equivalent hands down in the value for money stakes.

Rammy76

1,050 posts

184 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
muppets_mate said:
Rammy76 said:
yes

The 306 D Turbo must've been the first accomplished diesel hot hatch, I was very impressed when I drove one for the first time.
Or its slightly frumpy sister the Citroen ZX Volcane TD. Not truly 'special' but fond memories nevertheless smile

Forgot about the ZX, another fine French diesel hatch of its day. I actually quite liked the styling of them too.

StarmistBlue400

3,030 posts

219 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Rammy76 said:
yes

The 306 D Turbo must've been the first accomplished diesel hot hatch, I was very impressed when I drove one for the first time.
I had one as a company car (sorry it was that Gold colour).

Build quality was st but boy it was fun, it would cock a rear wheel when asked without any problems.

MPG was rubbish but it wanted hooning everywhere so no surprises.

TNH

559 posts

148 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
KimJongHealthy said:
I love how people point at "dull" toyotas and proceed to park their Focus with wind-up windows on the back right next to 14 other Focuses wherever they go.
At least a Focus is a nice car to drive, even if the latest generation looks like a Korean hatch.

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Its a bloody diesel, pathetic and pointless

J4CKO

41,628 posts

201 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Sure it is decent, my dad had one in the garage working on it for a friend the other day and it had done 114,000 miles with not a huge amount done to it other than basic servicing and looked like it would do three times that.

Utterly forgettable but a quality product.

Rammy76

1,050 posts

184 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Escort Si-130 said:
Its a bloody diesel, pathetic and pointless
Maybe to you.

It might suit other people perfectly well though.

conkerman

3,301 posts

136 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
I looked at these.

Nice enough car, deceptively swift, but woeful fuel economy (I do a lot of miles) and trouble with DPNR/5th injector and EGR put me off.

Shame really, as they are very very close to being an excellent if slightly nodescript car.

And the handbrake looks like a Penis.

Alfa159Ti

827 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
I remember encountering one of these some years back in the Derbyshire hills near Glossop.

I was in a MK2 MR2 and followed it as it exited a roundabout at a fair lick, so I gave chase expecting to reel it in and overtake it in short order.

Nope.

It took all of about a minute to leave me for dead and pull away beyond my field of vision leaving me red faced!


Alfa159Ti

827 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Escort Si-130 said:
Its a bloody diesel, pathetic and pointless
As someone who lists such motoring greats as the Ford Orion and Nissan Cherry in their past garage, clearly this lowly Toyota has nothing to offer such a performance car connoisseur... tongue out

thatdude

2,655 posts

128 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Escort Si-130 said:
Its a bloody diesel, pathetic and pointless
That's quite interesting; when you drove one, did you find the handling to be as good as the article suggests?

GTEYE

2,096 posts

211 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Alfa159Ti said:
Escort Si-130 said:
Its a bloody diesel, pathetic and pointless
As someone who lists such motoring greats as the Ford Orion and Nissan Cherry in their past garage, clearly this lowly Toyota has nothing to offer such a performance car connoisseur... tongue out
+1 A rather childish comment!

C.A.R.

3,967 posts

189 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
I looked at these, as they are priced similarly to the Civic 2.2 diesel. In stark contrast, the Civic doesn't have the same peaky-powerband, but a more linear rev-happy engine (unusual for a diesel). As a result, real world performance isn't much different despite the ~ 35bhp defecit. The Civic benefits from a much more economical engine and is seemingly just as reliable as the Toyota, whilst not looking quite so "White Goods" as the Auris does so well.

It's OK, but there's a reason the diesel Lexus IS220s mentioned in the article aren't that expensive either - the engine is a bit of a dinosaur.

mon the fish

1,419 posts

149 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Am I really on Pistonheads? Is this what a Pistonheader should do with £5k? Back to the barge thread I go...

dukebox9reg

1,571 posts

149 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
raa013 said:
Got one already - love it - 50K miles of untroubled hoonery in 2 years completed - would love to get it chipped but £600+ is a bit steep
http://www.diesel-performance.co.uk/vehicle-toyota_auris_2.2-d-cat-177-ps-07-09

Half the price.

uncler

37 posts

186 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
While I love hot variants of Toyota hatches (Corolla GTi, Yaris T Sport, Starlet GT), this is a poor show from Toyota. The Auris, even in this top spec version, looks like a Smeg fridge with wheels, the interior devoid of any glamour or exceitment and to offer no petrol version the final nail in the coffin. I just don't feel it has a point. It was out the same time as the FN2 Civic Type R which destryoed it in every single respect (fuel economy aside) and wasn't any more expensive either!

The Auris represents, to my eyes at least, Toyota at their absolute worst. That applies to both this and the current generation. I can't believe they have even sold a single one when any of the competition's equivalents do everything the Auris does, but better.

This post sounds quite harsh and to be honest, I really wanted to like the Auris SR. I think if you took the current generation Auris, gave it a sleeker 3 door body and popped in a modified FA20 out of the GT86 it might work as a decent hatch. Only problem is, countless others do similar already!

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
BristolLee said:
I had one fly past me in my Celica AND my friend in a 380bhp supercharged Celica up Tog Hill near Bristol. It left both of us for dead.

As it happened, he was at the exhaust place we were going to. It was running 210bhp from a remap and freer pipe.
Were you trying to keep up? Or was it more the case you could as well have been in a Veyron as the speed differential was so great he was half a mile ahead by the time you accelerated?

pledmonds

2 posts

166 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
I feel myself wanting to stick up for the SR180 - in part at least.

Personally I liked the look and feel of the car (mine was an '08 model in dark blue) and would certainly disagree with those who call it bland or dull. It's all subjective I suppose. I certainly think it's a more interesting car to look at and sit in than most of its contemporaries (Focus, Astra, Golf, A3, Leon, etc.)

Performance-wise it knocks spots off my current A3 170 TDi. Yes the power band is fairly narrow but from 50 to *faster* overtaking it's superb.

Likewise, handling (thanks to the multilink rear setup) is head and shoulders above my current A3 and Mrs P's Astra 150, though we found that the low ride height meant grounding on a fairly regular basis.

I bought one assuming the fuel economy tales were 'worst case scenario' internet scaremongering. In my case they all held true - I sold it after less than a year of mixed driving averaging 29.something MPG. Which probably puts it into Type R territory and certainly is affecting prices.

As above - EGR needs cleaning regularly - ours clogged and put us into limp mode a couple of times. We also had issues with an exhaust heatshield coming away and making a racket.

russy01

4,693 posts

182 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
We had one and it was dog st. It was the biggest motoring mistake we made and I have absolutely no idea what made us buy it.... (cheap deal as we knew dealer principal and we wanted a pokey derv)

It was boring to drive - it did not handle at all.
Pig Ugly to look at
Fuel Consumption was st - this engine is known to chew fuel and after while itself.

During our short ownership we had an engine rebuild as it chomped itself. My parents had an IS220d with the same lump and during their ownership they had a spanking new engine off a crate which also chomped itself....

We then had many many other problems. Thankfully the car was still under warranty but during out short ownership (12months) the car had £12,000 of work carried out at Toyota.

After our last bout of problems we left the car at the garage and told them we'd rather come pick up a cheque than the car and this is what we did. They paid us off and we went and bought something else...

We may have had a dog, but I would personally tell anybody considering this motor to completely avoid it. Much better cars out there for the same cash..... I cannot find a positive point unless you are getting an unbelievable deal...

usualdog

231 posts

164 months

Thursday 29th January 2015
quotequote all
Haha! I'm so easily influenced I've gone from wanting one (after reading the article) to wouldn't be seen dead in one (after reading the comments) Like the Fast Show character who sat in the pub agreeing with everyone.