RE: Honda Civic Type R - more details

RE: Honda Civic Type R - more details

Author
Discussion

Jonrav

31 posts

145 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all

celicawrc

3,345 posts

150 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
What an over-styled fking mess this car is! Awful!

otolith

56,026 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Jonrav said:
Not sure how much of that tit I can take.

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
This is actually worse than Ford's live presentation, and that's saying something!

Crafty_

13,277 posts

200 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
otolith said:
Not sure how much of that tit I can take.
He looks like an estate agent.

That isn't a compliment

(sorry estate agents..)

Quite amusing the place is in half darkness, maybe they think its ugly too and are trying to hide it hehe

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Wake me up when they get to an actual car.

Edited by Ali_T on Monday 2nd March 18:38

otolith

56,026 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
He looks like an estate agent.
A trainee estate agent hehe

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
NSX does look lovely. Better in the live stream than the photos. But engineered by a man called Ted?!

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
AAAAARGH, my ears. Kill the yoof music please.

DanielSan

18,773 posts

167 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Ali_T said:
NSX does look lovely. Better in the live stream than the photos. But engineered by a man called Ted?!
The finest handling sportscar ever were once engineered by a man called Colin..

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
True, that.

And the Civic doesn't look any better moving. That rear end is so ridiculously bulky! If you'r buying one, it would have to be black, to hide the stupid lower black detailing, and with some form of optional silver wheel to look less bulky and under wheeled, visually.

Crafty_

13,277 posts

200 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Dear god it looks even worse. Whats with the chunk out of the front wheel arch at the front ? looks like someone mistakenly lopped a bit out of the clay model.

Windscreen looks awfully laid back, the b-pillars are surely going to restrict vision ?

ETA: no EPB, but the lever was on the passenger side of the centre console ? very odd.

Still find it amusing they've launched a car in the dark.


Edited by Crafty_ on Monday 2nd March 18:56

otolith

56,026 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Meh.

otolith

56,026 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Seats look nice.

RemyMartin

6,759 posts

205 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Given the choice out of the 'hyper' hatches. Hyper being used to denote +300bhp. Id plump for the Focus RS.


DanielSan

18,773 posts

167 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
I like it, but somehow feel a bit underwhelmed.

pti

1,697 posts

144 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Disappointing. Looks a bit frumpy. Interior looks good and I'm sure it'll drive great but it's certainly not a looker.

R1gtr

3,426 posts

154 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
0-62 in 5.7? That is Pathetic, Honda engineers must have cried themselves to sleep a few weeks ago when the Focus RS was announced as 4WD.
I imagine this being totally outsold by the RS.

TameRacingDriver

18,068 posts

272 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
R1gtr said:
0-62 in 5.7? That is Pathetic, Honda engineers must have cried themselves to sleep a few weeks ago when the Focus RS was announced as 4WD.
I imagine this being totally outsold by the RS.
Shows you how spoiled we are that 0-62 in 5.7 seconds is regarded as pathetic.

I'm sure it'll be more than plenty fast out there in the real world.