New car in a smash within 12 hours - write off?

New car in a smash within 12 hours - write off?

Author
Discussion

Krupp Stahl

212 posts

128 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Jonno02 said:
Van driver tore off his two front wheels completely...
At least that stopped him driving off from the scene.


anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Don't worry about it, don't adopt a particular position or make an assumption at this stage, wait and see what they do.

If it is a write off they may well offer you a fair market price.

Just keep cool and let things play out. For every horror story you read on the web there are plenty of perfectly reasonable outcomes.

Jonno02

Original Poster:

2,246 posts

109 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Krupp Stahl said:
At least that stopped him driving off from the scene.
That's exactly what I thought. To be fair to the guy, he was extremely upset as he could tell the car was new and when I told him it was 12 hours old he looked like he was going to break down in tears. Nearly as upset as I was!

Just bumped into his dad and he couldn't apologise enough. He also said I wouldn't be left out of pocket and there were a few options such as (him) getting his lawyer involved or basically paying the difference of the cost to get a new like-for-like car. Seemed like a nice guy, but obviously, it's no consolation until it actually comes to that and he's still as sure about those options.

Matthen

1,292 posts

151 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Not sure I'd want it back after it suffered that amount of damage. I'd be praying for a write off. No way i'd buy one if i knew it had suffered that sort of damage - don't see that this is any different.

Push for your 14 k back imo.

pork911

7,127 posts

183 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
McSam said:
Don't worry about their "estimated market value" - you only just bought the car, its market value is quite clearly what you paid for it, or else you wouldn't have paid it. This means that it should be repaired.

If it is written off, you could argue that the amount you paid is actually below market value, because you mentioned you got a personal discount which is unavailable to the general public and not applicable to any replacement.
Absolute bks

dacouch

1,172 posts

129 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
pork911 said:
Absolute bks
His first paragraph is spot on, the second paragraph not so accurate but could be correct in fairly rare circumstances.

Just to clarify for you, the OP has just purchased the car recently so the write off value is deemed to be what he paid for it.

Sheepshanks

32,723 posts

119 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
charltjr said:
Don't worry about it, don't adopt a particular position or make an assumption at this stage, wait and see what they do.
I'd agree with that - no point in worrying too much at this stage.


The daughter of some friends of ours had her little Mitsubishi Colt fairly heavily t-boned. Car worth £2Kish at a push. Everyone involved said it would be a write off.

Sure enough, repair estimate was £3K. 3rd party insurer gave instructions for it to be repaired.

rehab71

3,362 posts

190 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Bet you wish you'd bought GAP insurance

TwigtheWonderkid

43,327 posts

150 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
pork911 said:
McSam said:
Don't worry about their "estimated market value" - you only just bought the car, its market value is quite clearly what you paid for it, or else you wouldn't have paid it. This means that it should be repaired.

If it is written off, you could argue that the amount you paid is actually below market value, because you mentioned you got a personal discount which is unavailable to the general public and not applicable to any replacement.
Absolute bks
It is. The insurer does not have to pay you what you paid for it the day before, because you may well have overpaid. Not saying this is the case with the OP, but to say they HAVE to match what you paid very recently is nonsense.

If you use that logic, if he'd underpaid for it, the insurer would be allowed to give him what he paid and not what it's worth, which is also tripe.

They pay the market value. That can be less than, more than or the same as what you paid for it the day before.

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
surely the 3rd party insurer cannot 'write off' the car?

they either pay for repairs, and car hire, and new insurance loading maybe, or they pay the full market value of the car, whichever is higher?

probably cheaper for them to go straight to "here's 14 grand" than piss about with a couple of months hire costs plus repairs, or say "the value of the damaged car is now 1500 or whatever, here's 12500, keep the car"


swisstoni

16,957 posts

279 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Matthen said:
Not sure I'd want it back after it suffered that amount of damage. I'd be praying for a write off. No way i'd buy one if i knew it had suffered that sort of damage - don't see that this is any different.

Push for your 14 k back imo.
My thoughts too. From the description of the car and the Transit, it sounds like quite a knock.

dacouch

1,172 posts

129 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
It is. The insurer does not have to pay you what you paid for it the day before, because you may well have overpaid. Not saying this is the case with the OP, but to say they HAVE to match what you paid very recently is nonsense.

If you use that logic, if he'd underpaid for it, the insurer would be allowed to give him what he paid and not what it's worth, which is also tripe.

They pay the market value. That can be less than, more than or the same as what you paid for it the day before.
The Ombudsman disagrees with you, if you purchased the car "recently" then the price you paid is regarded by the Ombudsman as being the car's value

Matt_N

8,900 posts

202 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
jig time then.

When you get it back go over with a fine toothcomb, door gaps, fit/action of doors. get a proper 4 wheel alignment done to make sure its properly straight.

Maybe a bit of an old fashioned view, but not sure if I'd want it back to be honest.
If it goes on the jig it will be 4 wheel aligned so no need to worry there.

We got rear ended last summer, 4 wheel alignment check was standard for the repair centre we used.

Crafty_

13,278 posts

200 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Yeah I'd assume it was 4 wheel aligned, the question is if its done correctly. Have seen repaired cars before with odd tyre wear despite being "in spec".

Jonno02

Original Poster:

2,246 posts

109 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
My thoughts too. From the description of the car and the Transit, it sounds like quite a knock.
Before the car was taken away, I had a look around the pillars etc and only the actual rear door panel was damaged. It had been pushed in from the force and stuck to the transit and been pulled nearly off has he bounced off.

Boot and all other doors open/closed perfectly. The mangled door actually opened and closed fine, but obviously being bent upwards, you could put your hand into the car whilst it was closed.

Repair centre informed me that the £7,000 cost involved 5 new seat panels, colour matching, 4 new tires, 4 new alloys and the full rear suspension replaced.

Edited by Jonno02 on Sunday 1st March 19:41

shake n bake

2,221 posts

207 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
I'd rather have that written off, you can bet there is frame damage, to repair that won't be economical, if it is repaired i'd bet good money that tyre will wear funny for the rest of the cars life. Hope you have gap.

Northernchimp

1,282 posts

132 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Thats an awful lot of money for an old shape Leon FR. Unless its a special edition or has two grand in the boot, I'm sure you could find a few comparable cars for less money. Surely this will be a factor if they write it off?

Jonno02

Original Poster:

2,246 posts

109 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Northernchimp said:
Thats an awful lot of money for an old shape Leon FR. Unless its a special edition or has two grand in the boot, I'm sure you could find a few comparable cars for less money. Surely this will be a factor if they write it off?
There's a few FR's around, no FR+'s though.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

198 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
btdk5 said:
bqf said:
It's hard to say without looking at it, but a £7k estimate will probably turn into a £9k bill. I suspect they will write it off.

Even if its repaired, it's going to be worth a lot less than £14k. It's st luck.

I'd be tempted to request it's written off and press for full reimbursement and buy another
Why would it be worth any less if they've repaired it?
Is it CAT listed? If it is clearly to joe public they will perceive its worth less and therefore its market value is less.
If its a straight repair then it shouldn't - but if a buyer needs any reason to knock price down they will, wouldn't you?

Northernchimp

1,282 posts

132 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Jonno02 said:
Northernchimp said:
Thats an awful lot of money for an old shape Leon FR. Unless its a special edition or has two grand in the boot, I'm sure you could find a few comparable cars for less money. Surely this will be a factor if they write it off?
There's a few FR's around, no FR+'s though.
Fair dos. Here's one if it helps... http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2015...

Not being anti-Seat (got 2), but not sure I'd put £15k in one of those. If they do write it off, at least buy the new shape. You'll lose a load of money on a mk2.

Edited by Northernchimp on Sunday 1st March 20:03


Edited by Northernchimp on Sunday 1st March 20:04