RE: Land Rover confirms Evoque Convertible

RE: Land Rover confirms Evoque Convertible

Author
Discussion

matt3001

1,991 posts

197 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
I like it.


Why has it got a pre facelift face on it though
Because the photos I put up are from February 2012.

RacerMike

4,204 posts

211 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
I like it.


Why has it got a pre facelift face on it though
The uncamo'd one was the original concept from way back when. The coach builders actually did an incredible job on it.

As for the 'testing'. Not sure the Cross Rail tunnel appears on our list of bookable facilities. May have to ask.....

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
I actually think it looks better than the tin top.

Which isn't saying anything at all really.

I'm always a bit baffled by the Evoque's sales figures. Apparently they sell shed-loads of them but I very rarely see one.

Wadeski

8,157 posts

213 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Well it certainly passes the "PH Test", the tenets of which are "Opinion of a car on PH correlates inversely to sales performance". See Holden GTS, Monaro, Subaru BRZ on one hand, and pretty much all SUVs on the other.

Bill

52,747 posts

255 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
Well it certainly passes the "PH Test", the tenets of which are "Opinion of a car on PH correlates inversely to sales performance". See Holden GTS, Monaro, Subaru BRZ on one hand, and pretty much all SUVs on the other.
biggrin

I don't really understand the hate, although I haven't seen one with the roof up.

RemyMartin

6,759 posts

205 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
kambites said:
I actually think it looks better than the tin top.

Which isn't saying anything at all really.

I'm always a bit baffled by the Evoque's sales figures. Apparently they sell shed-loads of them but I very rarely see one.
Where do yoy live?

I see an Evoque almost everyday on my Surrey to Reading commute. Loads of them around.

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
RemyMartin said:
Where do yoy live?
Suburbam Hampshire, which you'd imagine would be full of the things.

GetCarter

29,377 posts

279 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
RemyMartin said:
kambites said:
I actually think it looks better than the tin top.

Which isn't saying anything at all really.

I'm always a bit baffled by the Evoque's sales figures. Apparently they sell shed-loads of them but I very rarely see one.
Where do yoy live?

I see an Evoque almost everyday on my Surrey to Reading commute. Loads of them around.
We just get sick of endless Lotuses here wink


Edited by GetCarter on Monday 2nd March 19:15

Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
PistonHeads. Seriouscarsonlyforveryseriousdrivers matters.

AM7

268 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
I wonder what it will look like with the roof up, ever worse I expect, probably they haven't released any pictures of that hehe

unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Pvapour said:
think it looks awesome, glad to see a manufacturer doing something different, just because its a 4x4 doesn't mean it should be mud plugging!
skilly1 said:
Look like a bit of fun, would love to take my kids out in that during the summer! Stop being so serious!
You lot are correct of course.

Most of us here probably understand that the future requires more platform extensions or pursuit of niche segments. Contemporary lifestyles are more diverse and, thus, our product choices.

Have the attributes of this Evoque Convertible been drawn at random from a hat? No. But at a glance it might seem that way. wink Yet in another few years, we'll hardly notice.



Malachimon

477 posts

125 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
I'm actually really like it. I want to see one for real but I think I'd still buy a 4 door coupe with a pano roof

mini me

1,435 posts

193 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Malachimon said:
I'm actually really like it. I want to see one for real but I think I'd still buy a 4 door coupe with a pano roof
A 4 door coupe? With a folding roof?

I think it looks good. With the roof off. I cannot imagine how it could look good with the roof up though. It's definitely going to be an achievement one way or another.

unrepentant

21,257 posts

256 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Can't wait for it. We may not sell that many in the Midwest but in California and Florida they will sell boat loads. It looks great, will seat 5 and will go anywhere while giving a full wind in the hair experience. What's not to like? Can't understand some of the comments on here.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
I've just done a little sick in my mouth.

Bill

52,747 posts

255 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
will seat 5
Really? I'll have one then. biggrin

medieval

1,499 posts

211 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Does look a little like a clog in profile.

Megaflow

9,405 posts

225 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Centurion07 said:
The pinnacle of chavtastic, WAG automobile nirvana.

I would actually be embarrassed to get in one of those, never mind own one.
Nail on head. Coming to a middle age orange woman near you soon...

berlintaxi

8,535 posts

173 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
kambites said:
I actually think it looks better than the tin top.

Which isn't saying anything at all really.

I'm always a bit baffled by the Evoque's sales figures. Apparently they sell shed-loads of them but I very rarely see one.
You living in a cave?

Shed loads of them around south Manchester, not a massive surprise.

Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Monday 2nd March 2015
quotequote all
Bill said:
unrepentant said:
will seat 5
Really? I'll have one then. biggrin
Not convinced it will, but fingers crossed as it will make it more appealing and thus a greater sales success. These pics are from Geneva 2012, so perhaps the production version has changed.