Double flash, Fresh Tarmac, No lines. I'm safe aren't I?

[IntriguedUser]

S=D/T

Distance can only be measured/referenced using the lines, am I fine?

Thanks

[LiamMD]

In short no.

Any 2 fixed points in the pictures can be used as a secondary check to corroborate the speed reading, the white lines simply make it a bit easier for this to be done en masse.

You'll have to wait the 14 days I'm afraid.

[ikarl]

What Liam said.

[Mannginger]

Whilst that's true, wouldn't the partnership need to send someone around to measure the distance between those two fixed points and then provide proof of those measurements?

Might be too much effort for them to be arsed?

[chr15b]

I was under the impression the lines could be put into the photo after

[fausTVR]

chr15b said:

I was under the impression the lines could be put into the photo after

Hardly fair, surely not? Those lines are an integral part of the mechanism used to calculate the speed. I would appeal very strongly.

Edited by fausTVR on Friday 27th March 06:28

[marshalla]

There is a requirement for a secondary check method to be available, but the method is not specified. Photogrammetry can be used without painted lines being present.

When the lines are not present, it depends on local policy - some may send out the NIP, some may not.