Disabled bay abuser confronted.

[J4CKO]

NSFW, bit sweary, seems a typical attitude/outcome for someone confronted for using a disabled bay.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ca1_1429296754

Vile man.

[berlintaxi]

Assault, I would have passed it straight to plod, serve the scummy tt right.

[Boydie88]

Utter cock. Ventured out to the local Tesco yesterday. Half empty car park, one parked on the diagonal lines closest the store making a junction blind and another just parked in the road but in a corner where the road finishes in front of the store. Not blocking the road really but I just don't know how you can get out of them and not feel ashamed with selfishness.

Hilarious how often it's a Range Rover/X# who seem to think they're above everyone else. Good on this bloke for standing up to the selfish prick.

[bitchstewie]

Whilst the guy in the RR comes across as a total cock, you do have to wonder why someone would spend 2 minutes filming someone in a disabled bay if it wasn't to provoke a reaction.

[ClaphamGT3]

Assault - pass it onto the police; bet he wouldn't be such a 'hard man' then

[gubbabump]

I like how he is concerned for his kids but gets slightly aggressive and swears...

[J4CKO]

bhstewie said:

Whilst the guy in the RR comes across as a total cock, you do have to wonder why someone would spend 2 minutes filming someone in a disabled bay if it wasn't to provoke a reaction.

Perhaps the disabled guy has got sick of people abusing the spaces put there to make life a little easier for people with disabilities.

Most people avoid confrontation like that, but fair play to him for having a go, the RR driver should be ashamed of himself, sometimes a reaction needs provoking so maybe, just maybe, next time they dont do the same thing.

Edited by J4CKO on Saturday 18th April 18:22

[Matt Clay]

bhstewie said:

Whilst the guy in the RR comes across as a total cock, you do have to wonder why someone would spend 2 minutes filming someone in a disabled bay if it wasn't to provoke a reaction.

Well, yeah. Ideally the reaction would be "I'm sorry, I wasn't thinking. I'll move my car".

[Sensibleboy]

Typical nouveau riche man. Big chain, big watch big muscles with the big car to project to the world how important he is.

[brianb]

Am I the only one who thinks the guy with the camera is the bigger here?

[Petrus1983]

I've recently got annoyed with people using parent and child places needlessly, but in fairness those who are disabled really do need to be respected. This guys an idiot, a visit by plod wouldn't do any harm to remind him of how such systems work.

Eta - I'm being very careful here, but having re-watched and looking at the kid in the passenger side, there could be a possibility that it is infact the filmer who's in the wrong, and the guy is genuinely protecting his disabled child. If not, revert to my above post.

Edited by Petrus1983 on Saturday 18th April 18:28

[bitchstewie]

@Jacko and @Matt I kind of agree with you there, but I'm not sure that shoving a camera in someone's face and standing there filming them helps the situation.

Before anyone says it I'm not making any excuses for dhead in the Range Rover, but I don't think the guy with the camera did himself too many favours unless there's a bit of previous that's not on the recording.

[greygoose]

Sensibleboy said:

Typical nouveau riche man. Big chain, big watch big muscles with the big car to project to the world how important he is.

Sadly lots of that sort in the UK, nice of him to teach his kids how to swear and park in disabled bays.

[Jasandjules]

It would appear the chap filming has sought to provoke a reaction, the first time he got the plate the RR driver didn't notice, the second time he did. But he must be a very brave chap to attack a man with walking aids.

I hope that plod take note of that plate, and go charge him with as many offences as they can.

[Petrus1983]

bhstewie said:

unless there's a bit of previous that's not on the recording.

Jackpot - it's been bugging me so I watched it again, the filmer says "you haven't got such a big mouth now I'm filming you"- I'm guessing there's more to this than the 3 min film.

[ORD]

The child in the front seat doesn't look well to me. The filmer was an abusive prat and was swearing in front of the kids. No sympathy for him.

[Hilts]

Prick by the look of things.

[Petrus1983]

ORD said:

The child in the front seat doesn't look well to me. The filmer was an abusive prat and was swearing in front of the kids. No sympathy for him.

I'm inclined to go with this, he's either extremely tired or unwell - I think the filmer is pushing his luck on this one, especially considering how many true abusers there are.

[Sensibleboy]

If there was something wrong with the kid in the front seat to justify parking there then why didn't he just say something?

[1]

Both a pair of pricks. The guy filming was clearly going to push things until he got a reaction and then wants to sympathy because he's disabled. It looks like there were other disabled bays available and the guy in the RR was obviously waiting for someone. He may have been waiting for his 8mth pregnant wife for all we know.