RE: MX-5 prices announced!

RE: MX-5 prices announced!

Author
Discussion

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
Its all about expectations. The GT86 is in a league above for weight and size, but not a league above for performance.

Getting a bit picky, they both use a 2.0l lump so they'll produce ~150lbs. The GT86 will produce power higher up the rev range and the MX-5 will have a wider spread of power. I expect it'll make it a lot keener of out bends in the mid-range.
That's assuming it runs the same gearing; even if so, you could be a gear lower in the GT86 to be in the meat of the power.


I don't think they're "a league" apart - similar price point (now), near as dammit the same power to weight (as someone posted above), both driver-focused. My surprise is mainly at the eternal pasting the GT-BRZ gets on PH, opposed to the universal praise for the MX-5.

As indicated above, I have an MX-5 and enjoy it very much; I think this new model is the best looking of all generations, impressed at the weight reduction and think it's going to be a fantastic car. I haven't driven the Toyobaru and I'm not going to slag it off until I'm in a position to voice an informed opinion, which I feel a lot of the detractors do - condemning it by spec sheet without firsthand experience. The spec sheet praise for the MX-5 just underlines the 'fashion victim' effect.

g7jhp

6,965 posts

238 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
threespires said:
Superb pricing. My MX-5 in 1991 had a list price of exactly £19,000:00.
25 years later and the price is £500 less.

How many other manufacturers can claim that?
I'd imagine it's economies of scale.

The Mazda MX5 is now a proven formula which sells to it's fan base by the bucket load. Back in 1989 it was probably seen as a slight gamble as there were very no real mainstream roadsters.

With the Mk4 going back to the Mk1 ethos it should be a big hit.

KTF

9,805 posts

150 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Digsy said:
Does anyone know the exact spec of the ones that have been raved about in the mags and online? I'd be surprised if they were true base 1.5s with no LSD and standard suspension.
The first drive in autocar was in a 1.5:

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/mazda/mx-5-201...

Autocar said:
Mazda was reluctant to mention the 2.0-litre (or the optional automatic gearbox) because it thinks that this 1.5 is the mechanical specification that shows the MX-5 at its absolute purest. I can understand that, and love it for what it is.

WillBrumBrum

607 posts

198 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
God it's still so ugly, like the Zenos with the depressing headlights. Why oh why?

Here's to hoping that the Fiat one based on this car turns out a little happier.

lufbramatt

5,345 posts

134 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
My dad is hopefully ordering one of these so I'll be helping him spec it. Hopefully you'll be able to spec either the 1.5 or 2.0 with the lad, bilstien dampers but small wheels, no sat nav or other electronic nonsense.

converted lurker

304 posts

126 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
They deserve to sell well at that price.

ambuletz

10,740 posts

181 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
the 2litre doesn't seem that worthit with only an extra 30hp.

celicawrc

3,346 posts

150 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
2.0L - 160bhp.........no wonder they're reliable!

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
My first GG post after my week long ban is up! smile

I've just bought one of the last of the old models brand new as readers of my readers car thread will know. I did consider waiting for the new model but the price I paid for the old model made it a no brainier.

It helps I actually prefer the looks of the old one too but I'm sure once these become a more familiar sight it'll grow on me, I just hope the electric steering is as good as the old hydraulic system in mine. From previous experience of such systems it'll be in the wet when it's found most wanting-precisely the conditions when an MX5 comes alive.

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

130 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Why buy new when you can get a mk1 for £1000?!!!

Happyjap

382 posts

109 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Greetings from Japan everyone, this Mazda is supercar although in Japan Mazda company are seen very negative light because during world war two they made rifles for military police who shot allot of people including my great uncle I hear who refused to fight, but I don't care good deal fast car makes me forget their shame, but expensive in Asia!

RenesisEvo

3,608 posts

219 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
Why buy new when you can get a mk1 for £1000?!!!
Where? Prices seem to be firming up for ones worth buying.

celicawrc said:
2.0L - 160bhp.........no wonder they're reliable!
Torque? MPG? CO2? Redline? Inertia? The power figure is really only the start. Around 140bhp was about the most a typical 2.0 4-pot N/A saloon ever had.

Looking forward to playing with the configurator, although I suspect like the Mazda 2/3, to get that one crucial option you actually want, you have to go up several grades and pay a fair bit more.

LordGrover

33,545 posts

212 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
Why buy new when you can get a mk1 for £1000?!!!
rofl Are you for real?

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

163 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Nickbrapp said:
Why buy new when you can get a mk1 for £1000?!!!
rofl Are you for real?
Glad it wasn't just me thinking that! hehe

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

130 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Amirhussain said:
LordGrover said:
Nickbrapp said:
Why buy new when you can get a mk1 for £1000?!!!
rofl Are you for real?
Glad it wasn't just me thinking that! hehe
It's the answer to every other bloody thread on here so why not this one?
Only mugs buy new cars remember?!

Matt UK

17,702 posts

200 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
threespires said:
Superb pricing. My MX-5 in 1991 had a list price of exactly £19,000:00.
25 years later and the price is £500 less.

How many other manufacturers can claim that?
Wow, that is quite a stat!

BBS-LM

3,972 posts

224 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Bloody hell, nearly £24K for 160bhp, where do I not sign. Makes the GT86 look a bargain?

lord trumpton

7,401 posts

126 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
pap

g7jhp

6,965 posts

238 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
Amirhussain said:
LordGrover said:
Nickbrapp said:
Why buy new when you can get a mk1 for £1000?!!!
rofl Are you for real?
Glad it wasn't just me thinking that! hehe
It's the answer to every other bloody thread on here so why not this one?
Only mugs buy new cars remember?!
Why buy a cheap Mk1 at £1,000, when you can get a 14k mile Mk1 for a shade under £15k? wink


Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

130 months

Friday 24th April 2015
quotequote all
Amirhussain said:
LordGrover said:
Nickbrapp said:
Why buy new when you can get a mk1 for £1000?!!!
rofl Are you for real?
Glad it wasn't just me thinking that! hehe
It's the answer to every other bloody thread on here so why not this one?
Only mugs buy new cars remember?!