RE: 1969 Dodge Charger: Spotted

RE: 1969 Dodge Charger: Spotted

Author
Discussion

_dobbo_

14,384 posts

249 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
BGarside said:
Yeah, remapped diesels are the new muscle cars.

Who needs a V8??laugh
Believe it or not I've just gone from a 4.6l mustang v8 engined car to a 2.4l 5 pot diesel. The diesel makes more power, and more torque, whilst getting more than double the mpg.

But... God I miss that V8.

rs4al

930 posts

166 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
I was working in Winnipeg, Canada in 2004 and saw a charger advertised on the local 7-11 store wall....I think it was $3500.

Efbe

9,251 posts

167 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
for info:

Autos are much much easier for burnouts. Rather than having to dump the clutch massively thereby killing it a bit, you can simply keep the brake pedal down whilst hitting the throttle pedal until it loses traction.
Makes it incredibly easy without the worry of accidentally keeping traction and shooting off, or having to switch your feet to start braking.

leedsutd1

770 posts

187 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
The PH piece says shame its not highland green, am I missing something?

TA14

12,722 posts

259 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
leedsutd1 said:
The PH piece says shame its not highland green, am I missing something?
yes,
PH article said:
As an alternative along similar lines
by that stage they were talking about a different car.

Streetrod

6,468 posts

207 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
The thing is for that kind of money you could build your own much better version. Buy a decent body for a few grand ($10k - $20K), stick an Art Morrison chassis under it($15k), drop $30k on a twin turbo Nelson Racing engine which would be good for 800HP - 1000HP. Throw another $30K on odds and sods and bobs your uncle. It would be silly fast and handle as well. Seems a no brainer to me...

daytona365

1,773 posts

165 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
It's nice, very nice, in fact it's too nice to use !.....Which rather defeats the object of a 'muscle car' doesn't it ?

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
Is the vendor aware that modifications on this sort of car makes it less valuable, not the other way. £100k does seem like a lot of beans for a non RT, non number's matching Charger even if it does have a big engine, although its hard to tell exactly given no spec list.

While we all get bleary eyed at the mereest hint of the words 'Charger', 'Mustang' and the like, back in their day these cars (at least the 'cooking' models0 sold in fairly high numbers and at some point's of their history were next to worthless. Over the years Cooking models have ended up with trim and body panels that set the more sporty versions apart, sporty verisons got written off or died of rust and so became donor cars, the lines got blurred and now the collector car market, the type of people who spend six figures on similar cars without blinking, value originality above all else. A car restored by Bruce Willis with an engine put in by Jay Kay is unlikely to get a second glance.


daytona365

1,773 posts

165 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
Very true, originality is everything with high end classics no matter what they are. Though due to limited numbers of originals, there's a growing market in 'Tribute cars' whether they be muscle cars, 911's, even re bodied Ferraris. The price is whatever people will pay as always.

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
Streetrod said:
The thing is for that kind of money you could build your own much better version. Buy a decent body for a few grand ($10k - $20K), stick an Art Morrison chassis under it($15k), drop $30k on a twin turbo Nelson Racing engine which would be good for 800HP - 1000HP. Throw another $30K on odds and sods and bobs your uncle. It would be silly fast and handle as well. Seems a no brainer to me...
+1 cool


279 said:
Is the vendor aware that modifications on this sort of car makes it less valuable, not the other way. £100k does seem like a lot of beans for a non RT, non number's matching Charger...
That's what I was thinking as well.


Reardy Mister

13,757 posts

223 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
GranCab said:
Reardy Mister said:
Article said:
It probably won't even burnout that well with an auto.
Say what? It has a £25,000 8 litre V8 in it. You will literally need to own your own tyre shop to own it. Even an original R/T would have laid 11s for fun.

tut tut.

For your viewing pleasure
... looks like it ended up in the wall - useless & unruly American junk.
To label it useless junk, you would first need to clarify it's intended purpose. Otherwise you're just spewing ignorant hate. As Dakar rally vehicle, it is indeed useless junk.


Escort3500

11,916 posts

146 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
Streetrod said:
The thing is for that kind of money you could build your own much better version. Buy a decent body for a few grand ($10k - $20K), stick an Art Morrison chassis under it($15k), drop $30k on a twin turbo Nelson Racing engine which would be good for 800HP - 1000HP. Throw another $30K on odds and sods and bobs your uncle. It would be silly fast and handle as well. Seems a no brainer to me...
Spot on. Far quicker, better built and will go round corners. I like the feature Charger, but no way is it worth the asking price even if Willis and JK have owned it.

67Eleanor

70 posts

141 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
corcoran said:
That Mustang! God, it's beautiful.
She is a beauty alright but gets more attention than I like.

Buff Mchugelarge

3,316 posts

151 months

Thursday 7th May 2015
quotequote all
I'm a child of the 80's. I was raised on the General Lee and KITT, Chargers will always have a special place in my heart.


But only orange ones. and not non R/T.

velocefica

4,651 posts

109 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
Take it back to the US of A and they won't get anywhere near the equivalent of £100k for it.

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
I quite like the "roadkill" charger





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JXDcJQqZrA


GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
Reardy Mister said:
GranCab said:
Reardy Mister said:
Article said:
It probably won't even burnout that well with an auto.
Say what? It has a £25,000 8 litre V8 in it. You will literally need to own your own tyre shop to own it. Even an original R/T would have laid 11s for fun.

tut tut.

For your viewing pleasure
... looks like it ended up in the wall - useless & unruly American junk.
To label it useless junk, you would first need to clarify it's intended purpose. Otherwise you're just spewing ignorant hate. As Dakar rally vehicle, it is indeed useless junk.
As a car it would need to start, stop and go rounds corners with some dignity, as it plainly doesn't therefore qualifying my description.

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
I quite like the "roadkill" charger





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JXDcJQqZrA
I was going to say the same thing!

much better

Happyjap

382 posts

110 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
This is a thing of true beauty and what makes America great for cars of that era, this is iconic I think make this kind of car was in Dirty Marry crazy Larry =, if I am wrong please pardon this!

Happyjap

382 posts

110 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
This is a thing of true beauty and what makes America great for cars of that era, this is iconic I think make this kind of car was in Dirty Marry crazy Larry =, if I am wrong please pardon this!