RE: Aston Martin DBX - crunch time

RE: Aston Martin DBX - crunch time

Author
Discussion

exceed

454 posts

177 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Put it this way, at Geneva the wife looked at this said "Oh what's that!". Then immediately went over to the Vanquish they had.

Still I love the concept, and wish Aston success with this.

I would actually really like a Vanquish convertible, need to call them.

rudecherub

1,997 posts

167 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Strawman said:
Could they just stick some really big wheels on an existing DB(?) and save on development costs?



Edited by Strawman on Friday 15th May 14:11
Surely air suspension would do this?

Indeed perhaps modify the arches to accomadate a larger wheel, then enable the car to drop to Aston usual, or up for UK road as usual pot holes.

DonkeyApple

55,419 posts

170 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
SteveSteveson said:
I kind of like it, but without the silver roof nonsense.

However, I can't help thinking that AM would be better building things like this, and the 4 door they did, under the Lagonda brand. Its a well known name, known for luxury cars rather than sports, although this all depends on what exactly they mean by a crossover.

As for building in the US, I'm not sure about this. Mass production can be shipped around the world to follow a set of guidelines to get the same thing stamped out again and again, but I have seen too many high end companies try this way of extending their range and it does not work. It works if you extend down the way Porsche did, keeping the high end stuff well in site and letting the mass market stuff go elsewhere, but I'm not sure AM can do this. You lose too much control when you can't give someone a plan and rely on crafts, as AM do for many things still.
I tend to agree that anything like this should be under the Lagonda badge. It seems more appropriate.

The U.S. thing struck me as odd but at a wild guess I would hazzard that Merc have a chunk of excess capacity over there from a remnant of the Chysler days and that its the cheapest option for AM?

Best way to describe the car is 'striking' though. But I do like the concept. I much prefer my SUV/Crossovers to be more Rally Raid than Raleigh Shopper.

996jim

147 posts

153 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Just when we've got rid of Ed Milliband. Aston Martin come up with another stupid looking useless thing - Aston, go to specsavers and take the drawings for the current model line-up with you, they are so bloody old you'll get your glasses free.

fatboy69

9,373 posts

188 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
It's a no from me as well.

jeffsims

4 posts

212 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
No, no no. - Side view resembles an over-priced version of a puffed up Chrysler Crossfire.

pfijcali

4 posts

137 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
ZZZZZZZZZ…..Next!

Axionknight

8,505 posts

136 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
I don't think it looks too bad, certainly not great, but it isn't terrible.

I bet it'd be eleventy six billion pounds, though.

daytona365

1,773 posts

165 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
........Twelvety seven billion to you sir.

EuroFighter

154 posts

122 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
I think it looks good.

Then again I also liked the Spyker D8/D12... boxedin




patmahe

5,756 posts

205 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Am I the only one seeing a Ford Mondeo coupe? Not a nice one either, it's not awful but actually Ford would probably do a better job.

Baryonyx

18,002 posts

160 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
That looks so goofy.

unsprung

5,467 posts

125 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Apparently, Aston Martin have conceived this crossover with the hope of luring more women buyers. An archetypal customer named Charlotte, from California, is their focus. smile

If they manufacture it in the US, the US factory would be newly-built.


Note:

In the links above, you will see Google results. The relevant Aston Martin article should be the first link displayed at the top of those results.

The actual article link can't be embedded here because the publisher, auto news, blocks these with a subscription paywall. However the articles remain free to read if you click upon them via Google.

I hope that this W. Heath Robinson method will function for all here who click upon it. And if it doesn't, I apologise in advance.



Europa1

10,923 posts

189 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
Who's going to spend probably upwards of 40k for a turd like that ?
Upwards of £40k??

Have you heard of Aston Martin?!

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

138 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
I love it.

The Vambo

6,664 posts

142 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Fantastic, just what Aston need.

Only forward.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

136 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
........Twelvety seven billion to you sir.
That is sex on wheels.

daytona365 said:
Who's going to spend probably upwards of 40k for a turd like that ?
More like upwards of 100k

ajprice

27,530 posts

197 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
daytona365 said:
Who's going to spend probably upwards of 40k for a turd like that ?
Upwards of £40k??

Have you heard of Aston Martin?!
£40k might get you one of these instead, Volvo S60 Cross Country


As for the Aston, no.

DonkeyApple

55,419 posts

170 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
The £40k was in reference to the rally car thing from the US that the article said was $70k.

ajprice

27,530 posts

197 months

Friday 15th May 2015
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
The £40k was in reference to the rally car thing from the US that the article said was $70k.
Local Motors Rally Fighter? Yes I would.