The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Dashcam" Thread
Discussion
zedx19 said:
To divert attention from people squabbling over the Merc video -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0q-NFoEkeag&ap...
Not me, but found on Reddit this morning.
I wonder if the distraction that was added to by the cyclist had caused the death of a crossing pedestrian who would feel guilty in that situation ?Not me, but found on Reddit this morning.
I feel for the third party diver who was hit because BOTH the cyclist and the cock driver were engaged in an activity that CAUSED the damage to him..... he should flatten BOTH of the t
ts.\The original "fault" was the van for sure, the cyclist then engaged with the driver of the van and WAS part of the cause of the accident.
Sushifiend said:
zedx19 said:
To divert attention from people squabbling over the Merc video -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0q-NFoEkeag&ap...
Not me, but found on Reddit this morning.
The cyclist caused the accident. Can't see that the white van man did anything wrong, other than being distracted by a prick on a bike shouting at him!Not me, but found on Reddit this morning.
kev1974 said:
--- WARNING lots and lots of swearing ---
Angry DashCamMan (ADCM) has delivered another compilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8xleo1D3fs
Some bizarre supermarket car park rage at the start
A classic at the end when someone tries to overtake a bus, right into ADCM's face
The rest is just him getting overly angry about not very much
As well as being an obnoxious little urethra, I assume he's including himself in the "Another compilation of bad drivers/road users in the UK" tagline as he's not exactly perfect driver himself.Angry DashCamMan (ADCM) has delivered another compilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8xleo1D3fs
Some bizarre supermarket car park rage at the start
A classic at the end when someone tries to overtake a bus, right into ADCM's face
The rest is just him getting overly angry about not very much
"What you doing in the middle of the f ing road" @ 0:29 to a car just passed parked cars, whilst himself in the middle of the road passing parked cars (without slowing)
Should have slowed right down due to limited visibility @ 1:25
overtaking cyclist doing over 10mph crossing unbroken central line @1:50
continues driving towards car on the wrong side of the road @ 4:04 to teach them a lesson by forcing them to reverse
heebeegeetee said:
Sushifiend said:
The cyclist caused the accident. Can't see that the white van man did anything wrong, other than being distracted by a prick on a bike shouting at him!
I mean, the comments on here are so bad I really don't know if people are joking anymore or not. Sushifiend said:
The cyclist caused the accident.
No, he really didn't. The van driver is 100% responsible for not looking where he was going - cyclist man wasn't even shouting at him when he bumped the Mondeo, he was just looking over his shoulder at him. Tell you what, if you ever rear-end someone whilst driving, try out the "that bloke looked at me so I stopped looking where I was going" defence and see how far it gets you...zedx19 said:
To divert attention from people squabbling over the Merc video -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0q-NFoEkeag&ap...
Not me, but found on Reddit this morning.
A good example of why one should not engage at all with any kind of ranting cam-man. They are all nutters. Not me, but found on Reddit this morning.
Stickyfinger said:
Are you really saying that distracting a driver is OK and requires no critical comment/is not a factor however "correct" he felt he was ?
The van driver was looking directly through his nearside window hurling profanities at a cyclist when he ran smack into the car in front.kev1974 said:
--- WARNING lots and lots of swearing ---
Angry DashCamMan (ADCM) has delivered another compilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8xleo1D3fs
Some bizarre supermarket car park rage at the start
A classic at the end when someone tries to overtake a bus, right into ADCM's face
The rest is just him getting overly angry about not very much
Hearing his mrs speak like that too is truly disgusting. The pair of them are disgusting pigs. Angry DashCamMan (ADCM) has delivered another compilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8xleo1D3fs
Some bizarre supermarket car park rage at the start
A classic at the end when someone tries to overtake a bus, right into ADCM's face
The rest is just him getting overly angry about not very much
heebeegeetee said:
The van driver was looking directly through his nearside window hurling profanities at a cyclist when he ran smack into the car in front.
We know that don't we because we are not blind, thanks for pointing out the bleeding obvious....the cyclist was however involved with the van driver and was the one who was first to engage , or are you going to try and argue that as well ?
Between the both of them the third party suffered even if the Van driver should of kept his window shut.
Edited by Stickyfinger on Wednesday 26th August 11:14
gazza285 said:
I can't see that the white van man did anything wrong, other than not stopping in time before hitting the car in front, after pointlessly and aggressively cutting up the cyclist.
Yes, the van driver should have noticed the car in front of him stopping, but that happened only because of the distraction caused by the idiot with the camera. I didn't see any cutting up going on whatsoever, so I don't accept that part of your argument. anonymous said:
[redacted]
(a) Yes (b) Yes
My point is the situation involved both the cyclist (first to engage) and the driver (at fault) for whatever reason with the result being the 3rd party suffered.
Are you saying the cyclist did not start the verbal engagement ?
It is the unnecessary communication between the two of them that was the "cause" that impacted on a 3rd party.
However wrong the driver of the van is for allowing himself to be distracted by the cyclists interaction with him (totally) there is no question that the cyclist was part of the factors to the shunt by being the one to start the interaction.
IF he had not decided to interact with the driver there is good reason to think the driver would not of been distracted and thus would not of rear ended the 3rd party.
The Cyclist should not of started it and the van should not of continued it.....
Stickyfinger said:
Are you really saying that distracting a driver is OK and requires no critical comment/is not a factor however "correct" he felt he was ?
Yup.When I get in my car, it is not f
king ninety percent my responsibility to look where I'm going.It is not ninety-nine percent my responsibility.
It is one hundred percent my responsibility.
If Jesus himself descends from heaven and tells me I should listen to the sugar babes a bit more, it wouldn't be his fault at all if I rear-ended the car in front. It would be mine.
Stop ignoring that basic responsibility. Yes, you are ignoring it.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff