RE: Cosworth GT86: Driven

RE: Cosworth GT86: Driven

Author
Discussion

TameRacingDriver

18,091 posts

272 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
I would love this, bound to be an absolute blast. Perfectly balanced layout and chassis. Plenty of power and not too much weight. Great driving position. Semi-practical. I can't see much to not like. Shame the engine doesn't appear to be as nice as a VTEC or even a 2ZZ, but this looks great otherwise.

thejpster

227 posts

162 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
I thought the Cosworth that did the road car bits (and owns Coscast) was now called Mahle Powertrain and the bit that is still called Cosworth made race engines? Do the race engine people now do road engines too?



vsonix

3,858 posts

163 months

Friday 29th May 2015
quotequote all
Heimholz resonator is a baffle that smooths out air. With the m52 (bmw) engine there was one in the airbox, the main point of it seemed to be to reduce induction growl. Taking it away actually improved the car's feel.

blearyeyedboy

6,298 posts

179 months

Saturday 30th May 2015
quotequote all
Malachimon said:
I'm sorry but 7.6 seconds to 60mph in a car that costs over £30,000 is rubbish.

A Chrysler Crossfire NEW did 6.5 seconds and costs over £3,000 less, now you can buy one for under £6,000 which to me seems like a good deal.

Why does anyone buy new "performance" cars? And I use the word "perfomance" as loosely as a potato sack on a super model .
0-62 (which is the time you've quoted for the standard car, not the 0-60 for this one) tells you very little about how a car goes around corners.

A Crossfire wouldn't see which way a GT86 went across the Brecon Beacons, and quoting the price of a very old car isn't helpful. I could buy may cars that are quicker for less than £6000 but none of them are a new car.

If you want a nearly new sportscar for £15-20k, a GT86 is a very strong contender. MX-5's will be lovely but not everyone likes a soft top and GT86's are fractionally more practical if you need that. SLK's and Z4's are a bit "boulevard", 370Z's are thirsty and a bit brutish and Caymans will cost a lot to run. Caterhams and Elises require significant compromises. Really, there aren't a lot of better options and if I were looking for a car without rear doors it'd be top of my list.

Would I modify one like this? Probably not because the power of the standard car would be sufficient for me to enjoy the driving I do. But then it depends what rings your bell. If all someone cares about are 0-60 times and bragging rights there are plenty of £5k Imprezas for sale.

LordGrover

33,545 posts

212 months

Saturday 30th May 2015
quotequote all
Good post, but I suspect in vain. hehe

blearyeyedboy

6,298 posts

179 months

Saturday 30th May 2015
quotequote all

chrispj

264 posts

143 months

Saturday 30th May 2015
quotequote all
Malachimon said:
A Chrysler Crossfire NEW did 6.5 seconds and costs over £3,000 less, now you can buy one for under £6,000 which to me seems like a good deal.
But if you do that you have to live with something that was (a) based on the previous generation SLK (so old before it even came out) and (b) looks like a shamed Labrador wiping its backside across the floor...

VeeFource

1,076 posts

177 months

Saturday 30th May 2015
quotequote all
vsonix said:
Heimholz resonator is a baffle that smooths out air. With the m52 (bmw) engine there was one in the airbox, the main point of it seemed to be to reduce induction growl. Taking it away actually improved the car's feel.
They're chambers of a specific volume designed to cancel out sound at certain frequencies. Their use in intake systems a lot of the time is to get past noise regulations which are performed at certain engine revs. Sometimes you'll have them to mitigate resonance which can hamper intake airflow so removing them downstream of the maf sensor or throttle body is ill advised.

It may sound a fancy thing to have in an exhaust but the reality is it's probably there to reduce engine drone at cruising revs. A useful but fairly dull feature.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 1st June 2015
quotequote all
The stickers look chavvy but the concept is nice.

dinkel

26,947 posts

258 months

Monday 1st June 2015
quotequote all
danjama said:
Sorry but as somebody who loves GT86's and the idea of a boosted model, that 'promo' video was absolute ste. Just crap.

Good article though.
Back to the 90s! Cracking kit though. And for the money I think it's spot on.

RoverP6B

4,338 posts

128 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
How hard would it be to fit some noisy Subaru-style unequal-length exhaust headers? Then you could have it making sounds like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvYWTjI9U7s

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
How hard would it be to fit some noisy Subaru-style unequal-length exhaust headers? Then you could have it making sounds like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvYWTjI9U7s
There are loads of aftermarket UEL options