RE: Bristol is back!

Author
Discussion

DonkeyApple

55,401 posts

170 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
NomduJour said:
Some licence involved I think. Certainly employed a black guy at High Street Kensington.
Staff's staff.

What he said to me will remin as one of my abiding childhood memories, in stark contrast to words said by far superior people, those he liked to try and hobnob with.

A more amusing tale from many years later when I was returning to the property next door to his off George Road in Kingston, I watched his Blenheim roll across the road in front of me after he had forgotten to put it in Park one evening. It rolled off his drive, crossed the road and came to a halt in the driveway opposite.

Atmospheric

5,305 posts

209 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
Just what is wrong with a Corvette engine?

Atmospheric

5,305 posts

209 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
ChemicalChaos said:
DonkeyApple said:
Being white was the primary hurdle. Unlikely to sell any high end product from a London showroom sticking to that mantra today. Thank God. As Tony eventually found out and got sent packing. Interesting cars for ghastly people sold by a truly ghastly man. biggrin
To be honest, I'd rather have a Bristol than a camo-wrapped Bentley, velour-wrapped 599, gold-plated Rolls Royce, or any of the other chav chariots of choice for those oveburdened with money and underburdened with taste
Indeed. I've often been tempted by a 411. I've nothing against the car. I knew Crook and found him a deeply unpallatable man. And over the years I've had the displeasure of finding myself seated at a dinner next vile old duffers who bought his cars strictly because of the not for wogs policy.
Interesting.

J4CKO

41,623 posts

201 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
tog said:
Luckily the Bristol purchasers you describe are not among the many Bristol owners I know.
Luckily, most are dead or at best, dribbling in a wingback.
I am now imagining a cross between the Major of Fawlty Towers and Rowley Birkin (QC) off the Fast Show.

tuffer

8,850 posts

268 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2015
quotequote all
Funny this as I walked past their showroom this morning and noticed they are opening a new one just across the road. Wondered what that was all about.

daytona365

1,773 posts

165 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
The only Bristol I could get excited about was the gorgeous 411, everything that came after was overpriced tat for spoilt gullible 'cads' that inherited papa's loot.

mrclav

1,300 posts

224 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Atmospheric said:
DonkeyApple said:
ChemicalChaos said:
DonkeyApple said:
Being white was the primary hurdle. Unlikely to sell any high end product from a London showroom sticking to that mantra today. Thank God. As Tony eventually found out and got sent packing. Interesting cars for ghastly people sold by a truly ghastly man. biggrin
To be honest, I'd rather have a Bristol than a camo-wrapped Bentley, velour-wrapped 599, gold-plated Rolls Royce, or any of the other chav chariots of choice for those oveburdened with money and underburdened with taste
Indeed. I've often been tempted by a 411. I've nothing against the car. I knew Crook and found him a deeply unpallatable man. And over the years I've had the displeasure of finding myself seated at a dinner next vile old duffers who bought his cars strictly because of the not for wogs policy.
Interesting.
I too had heard about the 'policy' regarding non-white customers from someone I knew who was interested in purchasing a Bristol a few years ago (he didn't in the end). This is actually the first time I've heard it mentioned openly though...

Sheban Siddiqi? The irony in that directors name is not lost on me. I do rather hope Tony is turning in his grave!

jimfoz

66 posts

171 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
I always felt that Crook's protestation that 'they don't follow the opposition' in the later years was merely because they didn't have the cash to follow the opposition and not because of exclusivity - he was a successful car salesman after all. They were not like this in the 50's and 60's when they were part of the aircraft company and easily held up with they rest of the posh manufacturers. When they did eventually get the cash with Toby Silverton's investment, instead of developing a new car based on the previous incarnations, Silverton wasted millions developing a dozen Fighters. Crook did well to keep it going for as long as he did, but I imagine he spent most of his fortune from car and aircraft dealerships in the process.
I hope they do get back to their heyday when they did produce exclusive cars, but merely saying 'it will have a BMW engine' after 5 years of nothing and teasing us about hybrid technology is opening themselves up to disappointment from the public. It reminds me of Stanley Kubrick and his final film.


limpsfield

5,887 posts

254 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
As this is a Bristol thread can I just get in a couple of lines for the Bristol Bullst Bingo players.

"You either get them or you don't"

"wealth whispers"

thanks

NomduJour

19,144 posts

260 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
I bought them because I liked them. The chip is clearly with the people primed to trot out the same crap on every Bristol thread.

Funk

26,297 posts

210 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
ChemicalChaos said:
DonkeyApple said:
Being white was the primary hurdle. Unlikely to sell any high end product from a London showroom sticking to that mantra today. Thank God. As Tony eventually found out and got sent packing. Interesting cars for ghastly people sold by a truly ghastly man. biggrin
To be honest, I'd rather have a Bristol than a camo-wrapped Bentley, velour-wrapped 599, gold-plated Rolls Royce, or any of the other chav chariots of choice for those oveburdened with money and underburdened with taste
Dammit, that means Bristol is off the list for me if Matt thinks they're tasteful.

DonkeyApple

55,401 posts

170 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
And TVR.
In fairness, there has only ever been the one revival story from TVR rather than a succession. The news this morning re Gordon Murray and Cosworth at least adds further credence to the project.

I'd like to see Bristol back also and you'd think it would be more simple than the TVR project and should have happened by now.

Both were riddled with PR bks to swerve questions as to why they were built that way or why they didn't evolve with the times so they have more in common than at first glance. biggrin

NomduJour

19,144 posts

260 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Stripped-out sports cars are probably the only viable low-volume product now unless there's a volume partner to steal all the technology and expertise from. "New" TVR and "new" Bristol don't really fit into that category.

tog

4,545 posts

229 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Atmospheric said:
Just what is wrong with a Corvette engine?
Bristol used Chrysler V8 and V10, not GM.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

262 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
jimfoz said:
I always felt that Crook's protestation that 'they don't follow the opposition' in the later years was merely because they didn't have the cash to follow the opposition and not because of exclusivity - he was a successful car salesman after all. They were not like this in the 50's and 60's when they were part of the aircraft company and easily held up with they rest of the posh manufacturers. When they did eventually get the cash with Toby Silverton's investment, instead of developing a new car based on the previous incarnations, Silverton wasted millions developing a dozen Fighters. Crook did well to keep it going for as long as he did, but I imagine he spent most of his fortune from car and aircraft dealerships in the process.
I hope they do get back to their heyday when they did produce exclusive cars, but merely saying 'it will have a BMW engine' after 5 years of nothing and teasing us about hybrid technology is opening themselves up to disappointment from the public. It reminds me of Stanley Kubrick and his final film.
Tony Crook wanted a new development of the saloon car instead of the Fighter but was overruled. Apparently his proposed 'Buccaneer' would have cost even more to make than the Blenheim etc but if it had been more capable it might just have been worthwhile.

Atmospheric

5,305 posts

209 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
limpsfield said:
As this is a Bristol thread can I just get in a couple of lines for the Bristol Bullst Bingo players.

"You either get them or you don't"

"wealth whispers"

thanks
Correct analysis.

neil733

8 posts

124 months

Friday 5th June 2015
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Sheban Siddiqi said:
The future of Bristol is away from traditional powerplants to range-extended engines.
Right up to the point they found out how much it costs to do a "hybrid"........ ;-)
I believe Kamkorp probably know more about how much it costs to do a "hybrid" than many more mainstream manufacturers, having much consultancy experience in this field.

tuffer

8,850 posts

268 months

Friday 5th June 2015
quotequote all
This is so pretty, everything else in there is pretty hideous:

Europa1

10,923 posts

189 months

Friday 5th June 2015
quotequote all
On the subject of Bristol "vetting" potential owners, I can only assume Liam Gallagher bought his from another owner.

RoverP6B

4,338 posts

129 months

Friday 5th June 2015
quotequote all
Somehow I suspect that Gallagher, being a loudmouthed white twallock, would have suited Crook's image. I rather liked the old BMW and Chrysler Bristols up until the 70s, but thereafter they just got uglier and uglier. The last one was still, well into the Noughties, using Vauxhall Senator tail-lights. The Fighter looked amazing, I don't understand why it didn't do better - perhaps more a problem with the brand than the car.