What defines a fast car?

What defines a fast car?

Author
Discussion

LordGrover

33,539 posts

212 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
My old Griff was (supposedly) sub 5 secs 0-60 which felt properly 'fast', but point to point I'm faster in my GT86.

RobM77

35,349 posts

234 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
LukeR94 said:
Speed is in the eye of the beholder, as others have said previously it entirely depends on what you have driven/experienced beforehand.

If youve been in a 60hp Polo for 3 years a 200hp Civic type R is going to feel like an absolute rocket ship.
yes My 2-Eleven doesn't feel that fast if I've spent a few days driving it, but after driving my 320d for a few weeks straight it feels hilariously quick. One of the weirdest effects is getting out of a slicks and wings single seater after a day's testing into a road car - even something of reasonable performance just feels chronically broken.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
My old Griff was (supposedly) sub 5 secs 0-60 which felt properly 'fast', but point to point I'm faster in my GT86.
Don't tell the chaps on the TVR pages. According to them, the old TVRs are ballistic (and not just in a straight line). Slower than a GT86...that is glacial by the standards discussed on here.

DoubleSix

11,714 posts

176 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
LordGrover said:
My old Griff was (supposedly) sub 5 secs 0-60 which felt properly 'fast', but point to point I'm faster in my GT86.
Don't tell the chaps on the TVR pages. According to them, the old TVRs are ballistic (and not just in a straight line). Slower than a GT86...that is glacial by the standards discussed on here.
With all due respect though, you have to be a bit spesh behind the wheel to hustle a TVR properly, a GT86 not so much. A pal of mine who drives competitively took me out in a TVR and did things I've never seen anyone do in such an unforgiving machine. Humbling tbh.

R2T2

4,076 posts

122 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
As we all know the perception of a quick car is as unique as our fingerprints.
Some might say 0-60 in sub 10 is quick, some might say it's glacial, whereas others might say sub 5 is slow, if they're used to GTR rates of acceleration.

To me though, a quick car is something that can force your head back when you accelerate (current car does this, far from fast)

Fast though, is something that can throw your whole body into the seat. I've ridden in a mapped 335i auto, and when it kicked down and came on boost it flung you up the road but pinned you in your seat.

to me, something may be fast as hell, but if it has no sensation of acceleration, then it loses all of it's appeal to drive it quickly (to me)

I mean, mine feels quick and can throw your head into the restraint, but it's far from fast. 150hp tops, but the power curve is quite smooth, so apart from the initial shove in the back in lower gears it's good, but in the higher gears or at a fast road speed, you don't feel it so much.


BigBen

11,639 posts

230 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
TheAngryDog said:
I used to think, and still do, that a fast car was one that could hit 100mph in 10 seconds or less from standstill.

Would cars today that can achieve that, in your opinion, still be considered fast?
That is my exact benchmark for what I would call fast too laugh
I think my SL55 is about 10 seconds to 100, however the Ariel Atom I used to have was probably slower. But I know which felt faster and which would cover a lap of a given circuit in less time.

J4CKO

41,524 posts

200 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
LukeR94 said:
Speed is in the eye of the beholder, as others have said previously it entirely depends on what you have driven/experienced beforehand.

If youve been in a 60hp Polo for 3 years a 200hp Civic type R is going to feel like an absolute rocket ship.
true, but you would miss that torque biggrin

Bradley1500

766 posts

146 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
I don’t think speed can be defined with numbers, it’s a feeling.

Some years back my dad bought a Jaguar XJR. I went with him to pick the car up from London. Driving back, there’s no opportunities to go fast in London, so once we hit the motorway on the return journey we were both quite excited to see what the XJR could do.

After what felt like a small amount of acceleration dad let off the throttle and slowed down, a lot. He turned to ask me what speed I thought we had just accelerated to, I guessed around 110MPH maybe a little more. He laughed and replied with 140MPH and said he was surprised when he looked down at the speedo as well.

It certainly felt fast but due to the refinement you would have never thought we were doing double the speed limit. In comparison my Civic Type R feels frighteningly fast at 140MPH.

It also depends on what you’re used to. When I first bought my Civic Type R, I thought it was a fast car, coming from a BMW 318i which most definitely wasn’t. However, now I’ve gotten use to the power, it doesn’t feel as special.

I’m sure some PHers would get out of their cars and feel my Civic is glacial in comparison.

Whatever you have, after a while it won’t be ‘fast enough’, and you’ll be wanting more.

TWPC

842 posts

161 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
LukeR94 said:
Speed is in the eye of the beholder, as others have said previously it entirely depends on what you have driven/experienced beforehand.

If youve been in a 60hp Polo for 3 years a 200hp Civic type R is going to feel like an absolute rocket ship.
true, but you would miss that torque biggrin
laugh

TWPC

842 posts

161 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
Fast car?

Anything with 4 wheels, a seat and an engine outside the M25 (as I sit at my desk in an office in central London).

DocJock

8,356 posts

240 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
LJK Setright used to say a fast car was one which took less time 60-90 than 0-60.

TurboHatchback

4,160 posts

153 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
otolith said:
What you've previously driven.
^^^^

Everyone's perception of fast is different. Someone that has only ever been in 60bhp hatches will have a very different opinion of what is fast than a man who drives a Veyron.


0llie

3,007 posts

196 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
Before I opened the thread, I thought the same as the OP (0-100mph in sub 10 seconds).

br d

8,400 posts

226 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
Any that can out drag me on my 600cc Supersport.
Difficult to find proper specs online but I think my car could.

(But I think you'd be having much more fun!)

StottyEvo

6,860 posts

163 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
BigBen said:
StottyEvo said:
TheAngryDog said:
I used to think, and still do, that a fast car was one that could hit 100mph in 10 seconds or less from standstill.

Would cars today that can achieve that, in your opinion, still be considered fast?
That is my exact benchmark for what I would call fast too laugh
I think my SL55 is about 10 seconds to 100, however the Ariel Atom I used to have was probably slower. But I know which felt faster and which would cover a lap of a given circuit in less time.
I'd be astounded if the Atom didn't do 0-100 in well under 10secs

theboss

6,913 posts

219 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
BigBen said:
StottyEvo said:
TheAngryDog said:
I used to think, and still do, that a fast car was one that could hit 100mph in 10 seconds or less from standstill.

Would cars today that can achieve that, in your opinion, still be considered fast?
That is my exact benchmark for what I would call fast too laugh
I think my SL55 is about 10 seconds to 100, however the Ariel Atom I used to have was probably slower. But I know which felt faster and which would cover a lap of a given circuit in less time.
I'd be astounded if the Atom didn't do 0-100 in well under 10secs
Same. M5 is apparently 8-odd and I'd expect the atom to be much quicker than that.

Re the commend above on 600cc sport bikes - is it fair to assume they are going to be about 7-odd seconds to 100?

DoubleSix

11,714 posts

176 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
I believe the Atom can do 0-100 and back to 0 in around 10secs!!

Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
One where you suddenly realise you can't brake enough in time.


loudlashadjuster

5,118 posts

184 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
kambites said:
"What defines a fast car?". The speed of the competition.
The correct answer.

WhiteAMG45

734 posts

159 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
Mine is quite nippy
I went from GT86 to mine and it feels fastdriving

But as alot of people have said it is the feeling and alot of passengers have said it pushes you back in your seat at that is a good guide of speed