What defines a fast car?

What defines a fast car?

Author
Discussion

carinaman

21,319 posts

173 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
DocJock said:
LJK Setright used to say a fast car was one which took less time 60-90 than 0-60.
I thought I better check before posting the same thing.

MrBarry123

6,028 posts

122 months

Thursday 25th June 2015
quotequote all
T0MMY said:
ORD said:
Bizarre responses from a lot people.

Many focussing on what makes a car FEEL fast, rather than actually being fast. A lot setting absurdly high benchmarks only met by track cars, exotics and turbo monsters!

3 seconds to 60 isn't 'fast'; it's batst mental fast.
I do sometimes think people like to use these threads to emphasise that they're so used to such ballistically quick vehicles that nothing short of an Atom with a Veyron engine driving each wheel is fast to them.
Completely agree. 0-100 in 10 seconds or below isn't fast, it's very quick and as such, 0-100 in 10 seconds isn't a fair measure. The new Fiesta ST, Mini Cooper S, Corsa VXR, Peugeot 208 GTI 30th etc. are all fast cars however none of them do 0-100 in anywhere near 10 seconds.

Anything with the performance of these cars and upwards I would consider to be fast cars. Yes, there are different brackets of fast however each bracket is inhabited by fast cars e.g. the below...

1. Fiesta ST, Corsa VXR etc. - 0-60 in 6-7 seconds, top speed of 140mph, good in gear performance
2. Golf R, Audi S3 etc. - 0-60 in around 5 seconds, top speed of 155mph, impressive in gear performance
3. BMW M3, C63 AMG etc. - 0-60 in around 4 seconds, top speed of 155mph however could probably muster 170mph+ derestricted
4. Nissan GTR, Porsche 911 Turbo etc. - 0-60 in around 3 seconds, top speed of 180mph+
5. P1/LaF/918/One:1 - nippy

Edited by MrBarry123 on Thursday 25th June 23:24

RegMolehusband

3,961 posts

258 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
But as I said above, "fast" is not all about acceleration and top speed. A light car, such as a Caterham, will out brake any of the above, turn in sharper and be back on the power before the others have finished braking. smile I am of course basing this on hill climb experience where cars such as the above are decidedly tardy wink.

Though, to contradict myself, they are all fast and enjoyable cars, but some will brake and turn in better than others.

Edited by RegMolehusband on Friday 26th June 07:25

Vanin

1,010 posts

167 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
Book a test drive in the Tesla Model S P85D Dual motors 691 hp and 0-60 in 3.2

It is the only car I have been in where the pressure on my chest during full acceleration left me feeling like I needed a "G" suit!

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
Completely agree. 0-100 in 10 seconds or below isn't fast, it's very quick and as such, 0-100 in 10 seconds isn't a fair measure. The new Fiesta ST, Mini Cooper S, Corsa VXR, Peugeot 208 GTI 30th etc. are all fast cars however none of them do 0-100 in anywhere near 10 seconds.

Anything with the performance of these cars and upwards I would consider to be fast cars. Yes, there are different brackets of fast however each bracket is inhabited by fast cars e.g. the below...

1. Fiesta ST, Corsa VXR etc. - 0-60 in 6-7 seconds, top speed of 140mph, good in gear performance
2. Golf R, Audi S3 etc. - 0-60 in around 5 seconds, top speed of 155mph, impressive in gear performance
3. BMW M3, C63 AMG etc. - 0-60 in around 4 seconds, top speed of 155mph however could probably muster 170mph+ derestricted
4. Nissan GTR, Porsche 911 Turbo etc. - 0-60 in around 3 seconds, top speed of 180mph+
5. P1/LaF/918/One:1 - nippy

Edited by MrBarry123 on Thursday 25th June 23:24
I agree that those are all fast cars (and absurdly fast in lists 4 and 5).

I think 7 seconds 0-60 is about to right as a threshold. My wife's 320i has a 7.5 seconds 0-60 and is probably slightly traction limited off the line (engine a long way from the back tyres but they are big and grippy), so it is a little bit faster than that would suggest once moving - as any FWD car will be, of course, even more so there.

It feels to me to be on the borderline between fast and 'not slow' / normal. Certainly, everything I have ever driven that has a 0-60 time of 8 seconds plus hasn't felt even borderline.

As for at what speeds a car should deliver good acceleration to be and/or feel fast, I've always thought that 30-70 and 50-90 are the important tests - a car that rips 40 increments at moderate speeds is both actually fast for road use and feels it. A GTR or Turbo S will tear your head off between those speeds.

It differs slightly for different cars, though - I wouldn't worry much about 50-90 in a hot hatch; I would want it to be ballistic 20-50 or 60. A 250bhp hot hatch geared to top out at 120mph could feel and be very fast in real world driving.

robinessex

11,062 posts

182 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
One that I can't keep up with!

Jasandjules

69,922 posts

230 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
Vyse said:
So what cars are considered fast that dont if you the sensation of being pinned to the seat?
Oddly I find my Chimaera to be quite nippy but also it doesn't force you backwards. Which is odd as my old 4 litre did feel faster in that respect. The 5 delivers much smoother power, you just see the person in the mirrors reversing.......

BigBen

11,648 posts

231 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
theboss said:
StottyEvo said:
BigBen said:
StottyEvo said:
TheAngryDog said:
I used to think, and still do, that a fast car was one that could hit 100mph in 10 seconds or less from standstill.

Would cars today that can achieve that, in your opinion, still be considered fast?
That is my exact benchmark for what I would call fast too laugh
I think my SL55 is about 10 seconds to 100, however the Ariel Atom I used to have was probably slower. But I know which felt faster and which would cover a lap of a given circuit in less time.
I'd be astounded if the Atom didn't do 0-100 in well under 10secs
Same. M5 is apparently 8-odd and I'd expect the atom to be much quicker than that.

Re the commend above on 600cc sport bikes - is it fair to assume they are going to be about 7-odd seconds to 100?
Depends which Atom doesn't it? The 0 - 100 - 0 record holder was a supercharged 300 bhp one, mine wasn't. In particular the first one I had with 120 bhp would no way do 0-100 in 10 seconds.

Having looked it up the 245 I had later was 7.5 to 100 which surprises me, probably as acceleration is really starting to tail off at 100, whereas the Merc just keeps pulling.

Marc p

1,036 posts

143 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
My benchmark is my passengers reaction to acceleration biggrin

There is 3 levels of fast:

Level 1 - You put your foot down and they usually shout some expletives.

Level 2 - You put your foot down, they shut up and go very wide eyed.

Level 3 - This is my new one after recent power hikes, you put your foot down, they take a sharp intake of air and hold their breath until you let off..........I like this one biggrin.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
RegMolehusband said:
But as I said above, "fast" is not all about acceleration and top speed. A light car, such as a Caterham, will out brake any of the above, turn in sharper and be back on the power before the others have finished braking. smile I am of course basing this on hill climb experience where cars such as the above are decidedly tardy wink.

Though, to contradict myself, they are all fast and enjoyable cars, but some will brake and turn in better than others.

Edited by RegMolehusband on Friday 26th June 07:25
yes As I said in my first post, fast for me is usually about lap times. I regard a Caterham R300 as faster than an M3, even though it's slower in terms of acceleration and top speed, because it's faster around a track.

trails

3,723 posts

150 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
Marc p said:
My benchmark is my passengers reaction to acceleration biggrin

There is 3 levels of fast:

Level 1 - You put your foot down and they usually shout some expletives.

Level 2 - You put your foot down, they shut up and go very wide eyed.

Level 3 - This is my new one after recent power hikes, you put your foot down, they take a sharp intake of air and hold their breath until you let off..........I like this one biggrin.
Proper level three is when they just close thier eyes with one hand clutching the seat bolster and the other clinging to the FM handle smile

jeffw

845 posts

229 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all


My personal level of fast would be faster than my kitcar is....this was from the datalog at Silverstone Stowe last weekend. Not bad for a Road going car.

t4thomas

394 posts

167 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
jeffw said:


My personal level of fast would be faster than my kitcar is....this was from the datalog at Silverstone Stowe last weekend. Not bad for a Road going car.
Best keep saving for the Veyron then.

CB2152

1,555 posts

134 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
Marc p said:
My benchmark is my passengers reaction to acceleration biggrin

There is 3 levels of fast:

Level 1 - You put your foot down and they usually shout some expletives.

Level 2 - You put your foot down, they shut up and go very wide eyed.

Level 3 - This is my new one after recent power hikes, you put your foot down, they take a sharp intake of air and hold their breath until you let off..........I like this one biggrin.
From recent experience, I apparently have this one covered! smile

Would like the others as well really...

aka_kerrly

12,419 posts

211 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
T0MMY said:
Basing it on how fast it feels is the root cause of people overestimating how fast their turbo diesels are.

My definition of a fast car seems considerably lower than many peoples'. I'd definitely call a 6 second 0-60 car fast. Cutting it off at 0-100 in <10 seconds excludes all kinds of cars that I'd find hard to believe shouldn't be considered "fast".
beer

This makes sense, the feeling of speed is important but so is the speedo going up! I can't stand it when people with TDIs bang on about how fast they are when by most measures 8-10 seconds to 60 is not that fast.

If instead of relying on the feeling of being pushed into the seat due to a 1000rpm power band between 2000-30000 rpm maybe pay a little more attention to the way the speedo rises.

For me a proper fast car is one where the speedo moves as fast as the rev counter, one where if you floor it in 3rd/4th/5th the engine responds the way a "regular" car replies in 1st & 2nd!


ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
After driving it for 2 years, I still think my car with a pathetic 316bhp is plenty fast for road use. Floor the throttle at moderate revs and it is quickly much too fast for public roads.

I often wonder if people who only think super fast cars are "fast" use wide-open throttle at high revs all the time in the cars that they don't think are fast.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

229 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
A reference point.

aka_kerrly

12,419 posts

211 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
I often wonder if people who only think super fast cars are "fast" use wide-open throttle at high revs all the time in the cars that they don't think are fast.
Interesting point, a super fast car that can only utilise a fraction of it's potential due to space/laws/road conditions could be perceived as slower compared with a car that you can rag 2nd/3rd/4th to the redline.




TheJimi

25,003 posts

244 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
ORD said:
I often wonder if people who only think super fast cars are "fast" use wide-open throttle at high revs all the time in the cars that they don't think are fast.
Interesting point, a super fast car that can only utilise a fraction of it's potential due to space/laws/road conditions could be perceived as slower compared with a car that you can rag 2nd/3rd/4th to the redline.
Eh?!

All it means is that to achieve the same level of performance as the car being 10/10th'd in every gear, the super-fast car will just be using a small amount of it's available performance.

Now, if you want to say that the driver of the car being 10/10th'd is having more fun, then I would perhaps be inclined to agree with you.




Edited by TheJimi on Friday 26th June 15:40

mat205125

17,790 posts

214 months

Friday 26th June 2015
quotequote all
A fast car is one that feels fast and excites.

A 1380 mini with 100bhp, or a 1.9 GTi with 130 bhp can be described as fast cars, however a modern semi-sporty saloon may produce better numbers for bhp, acceleration and top speed, however NOT be classed as a fast car.

There are lots of cars that are objectively quick to a statistician, however aren't what I'd class as fast cars.