RE: Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S :Driven

RE: Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S :Driven

Monday 29th June 2015

Mercedes-AMG GLE 63 S: Driven

Is it a truck? Is it a supercar? Nobody knows, least of all us. But we drove it anyway...



Who would buy this? Hard to escape the question when first faced with the Mercedes-Benz GLE Coupe in the metal for the first time. Other obvious lines of enquiry might include what is it and why did AMG put its name to this GLE 63 S version?

The answer is, of course, because people buy them and manufacturers need to make money, not just satisfy the one per cent of the car population who consider themselves enthusiasts. Who these SUV-coupe buyers are and what they know about cars is almost irrelevant. In this niche-obsessed market, it would be crazier for Benz to ignore the X6 and X4 than try to replicate them.

Well if an X6 doesn't quite cut it...
Well if an X6 doesn't quite cut it...
So instead of bemoaning the GLE Coupe's very existence, let's get on with driving it. In true PH style we're side-stepping the perfectly ample and torque-laden V6 offerings of the GLE 350 and 450, instead jumping straight into the full-fat, top of the range AMG version. All GLE Coupes can benefit from some light 'AMG Sport' technology and branding but only the GLE 63 S gets the full treatment.

The 22-inch wheels are standard fit on this model, as is the unique and suitably aggressive body kit. But all the chrome trim and LEDs in the world can't disguise the size of the GLE as you step in, and up, to the cabin. The height of the door is impressive, a deep and heavy chunk of metal that swings back into place behind you, like a tombstone falling into a velvet-lined grave marked 'Good Taste'.

Even when you're comfortably seated up and above the common folk the GLE is still tangibly E-Class, though that's not always the best thing. Yes, that's your cue to unleash the outrage about the tablet-style display seemingly so hated by PHers but, Mercedes maintains, is the best solution to putting the info(tainment) in your line of sight.

The space around the driver and passenger is impressive. Almost superior to the E-Cass or 5 Series in both height and elbow room. Though behind it's a little less impressive, being more M6 Gran Coupe than E63 wagon. Bigger adults will be cramped, but teenagers and younger kids perfectly comfortable. Forget about the boot though. While it could certainly swallow a lot of shopping, bigger and more awkward items (including the four-legged variety) will definitely struggle.

See here for the real appeal
See here for the real appeal
Push the button
Like the E 63 S, the GLE 63 S is powered by the sledgehammer subtle M157 5.5-litre V8. This twin-turbo, 585hp monster is an impressive and characterful powerplant in any application. But despite its relative youth this might be one of the last times we see this in a new AMG. Push the button and a cold-start apocalypse explodes from the twin AMG-trimmed tailpipes, a sound that never really dies down until you finish the journey or allow the stop-start technology to work.

As with every car these days, the GLE is afflicted with a multitude of driving modes, which change everything from damping rates to exhaust note to gear selection in the 7G-Tronic automatic gearbox. So why is 'Comfort' not that comfortable? The constant thump of the V8 soundtrack is just the wrong side of reassuring at motorway speeds, and the ride quality marred by a constant high-frequency shuddering that can turn even the smoothest looking road into a bit of an annoyance. Though the weighting of the steering is at its best in comfort mode.

Rocking in your wake
Over on the sportier side of the dial, the ride becomes unnaturally firm and the cornering abilities uncanny for a 2,350kg SUV. Coupled to the utterly ludicrous amounts of shove from that AMG motor and endless traction from the 40:60-split 4Matic all-wheel drive, the GLE will fulfil all your overtaking needs with aplomb.

Of course, the seating position helps you too, with excellent forward visibility. Super-quick shifts are only a tap of the paddle away, allowing you to plan the manoeuvre and execute it, leaving the 'victims' rocking in your wake.

Arrival into the corners at these kinds of speeds might be enough to scare you in a previous generation SUV, but not the GLE. While every model gets Airmatic air-sprung suspension, only the '63 S benefits from AMG's active roll-control and hydraulic anti-roll bars as standard (though it's an option on the GLE 450). In Sport mode the big super-jeep feels like it wants to enter a racetrack, so taut and firm is the ride. Body control from the active hydraulic anti-roll bars is always deeply impressive.

As confused on the road as it sounds on paper
As confused on the road as it sounds on paper
Uncanny valley
But wind it up a notch to Sport+ and things just get silly. The steering wheel becomes leaden and dull, devoid of feedback. Annoyingly, even when configuring your 'Individual' mode, it doesn't allow you to separate the steering weight from the suspension and anti-roll control. Which is a shame, as Comfort definitely enjoys the best feedback.

Another annoyance is that every downshift in Sport+ performs the exact same pop-BANG exhaust note. They talk about the discomfort of the 'uncanny valley' for androids looking like humans, but it's the perfectly choreographed look-at-me exhaust pops here that will quickly put you off the Sport+ mode after your first 10 minutes in the car. They're so identical and predictable that the fun wears out within minutes.

And while potholes and low kerbs might make you fear for the health of the rubber bands stretched around those 22-inch rims, it's not actually the big bumps that upset the GLE Coupe. It's the high-frequency vertical motions you can't ignore. Like fitting cheap aftermarket coilovers to an old car, there's a lack of refinement unusual for any car sporting the three-pointed star.

Well of course they'll be everywhere
Well of course they'll be everywhere
Naughty or Niche?
Given the bar set by recent AMGs it seems surprising the Affalterbach crew would put their names to a car with such flaws, leading to an equally disturbing conclusion. Namely, the GLE Coupe really is meant to 'feel' like this. And this contrived AMG 'sportiness' is spread superficially over the GLE Coupe like icing sugar and sprinkles over a baked potato.

And for every 99 people ready to dismiss this sweet and savoury creation on a point of principle there will be another absolutely smitten by it. And there are markets where that proportion will be significantly higher - welcome to the new world order where the apparently 'niche' is king.

It's a perfectly impressive, yet utterly ridiculous car, and any keenly worded rant about its buyers being poseurs, footballers and those needing to over compensate for deficiencies elsewhere will bounce off those attracted to it like water off a duck's back. And we wouldn't want to steal your thunder...


MERCEDES-AMG GLE63 S COUPE
Engine
: 5,461cc V8, twin-turbo
Transmission: 7-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 585@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 560@1,750-5,250rpm
0-62mph: 4.2sec
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 2,350kg
MPG: 23.7mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 278g/km
Price: £96,555

[Source: Mercedes-AMG]







   
   
Author
Discussion

griffdude

Original Poster:

1,823 posts

248 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
A valiant effort at turd polishing.

vtecyo

2,122 posts

129 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Nearly £100,000.

Lol.

High Roller

110 posts

173 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Looks hideous, sounds hideous from the review. Bound to sell like hot cakes.

Cupramax

10,478 posts

252 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
vtecyo said:
Nearly £100,000.

Lol.
The X6M on the BMW stand at Goodwood FOS had £113k on it!!! laugh

redddraggon

268 posts

129 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
I like it, and the X4/X6, but judging from my car history I seem to go for the SUV type things everyone hates.

Fetchez la vache

5,572 posts

214 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
article said:
Forget about the boot though. While it could certainly swallow a lot of shopping, bigger and more awkward items (including the four-legged variety) will definitely struggle.
This is my biggest beef with cars like this, even over the aesthetics.
If you're going to make the car thing huge, at least allow me to put the space to some use so I can carry lots of crap.

Jam12321

164 posts

110 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Jesus christ that thing is ugly! Merc will sell them by the bucketloads...

chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Almost two and half tons! Cripes, no wonder the bhp is so high!

jamespink

1,218 posts

204 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Utterly ridiculous car unless you have just dropped your son off at my sons school. Fully 60% of the car park is jammed with this kind of M-Class/X5/XC90 and yes, there are 6.3 litre examples there, all of which come from within a short school run radius, so obviously necessary. Other fun stuff is a new California, a '66 Mustang, a 512. There is plenty of spare cash out there waiting to be hoovered up, so why on earth wouldn't they do it? They are in business to make cars people buy...

MajorMantra

1,290 posts

112 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Well written review, I enjoyed it.

I wonder how many years this uber-SUV arms race has in it? Many, I fear.

rtz62

3,360 posts

155 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Another triumph of style over substance.
I applaud plethy of go, but if it handles like a space-hopper over every undulation, then it will be a failure.
However, as most of these will sell to premiership footballers and the like, the majority of whom can't actually 'drive' but purchase the car to 'pose' then it's 'winner, winner, chicken dinner'
Or not.......

greggy50

6,166 posts

191 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
0 - 60 in 4.2 seconds is comically fast for such a large car this would probably beat something like a ferrari 360 to 100mph

Horribly ugly and pointless mind...

gt3atlast

36 posts

115 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
For fat yanks and wannabe fat yanks

dvs_dave

8,607 posts

225 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Safe to assume owners of such an exercise in dreadful show-offy taste will be a thoroughly objectionable and self absorbed person that likely chews with their mouth open.

How come people like this are able to amass sufficient funds to purchase such an expensive abomination? Presumably not legally, or with little to no thought of future financial security.

dbdb

4,324 posts

173 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
This is spectacularly ugly, even by Mercedes standards.

kbf1981

2,250 posts

200 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
vtecyo said:
Nearly £100,000.

Lol.
And yet people would pay that for a range rover... that doesn't go as fast, and equally, will never be used off road.

RedWhiteMonkey

6,837 posts

182 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
I saw one in the flesh a couple of months ago in Stuttgart, in my opinion its hideous.

macdeb

8,508 posts

255 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
In a word, Vulgar.
Description of a buyer, a cock.
almost as bad as the X6 [and the smaller, pretending to be X4]

antspants

2,401 posts

175 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
"a deep and heavy chunk of metal that swings back into place behind you, like a tombstone falling into a velvet-lined grave marked 'Good Taste'."

Very good claplaugh

alexpa

644 posts

172 months

Monday 29th June 2015
quotequote all
Yuk, yuk and yuk. I'd really like the opposite of this though.