Strange car options

Author
Discussion

ensignia

919 posts

235 months

Thursday 2nd July 2015
quotequote all
Not really related to the thread, but saw a battered old '97 Passat estate in lowly 1.8 form with factory fitted xenon headlamps. Just thought it was a bit bizarre.

MitchT

15,850 posts

209 months

Thursday 2nd July 2015
quotequote all
Deadlift said:
M435i? confused
OK, 435i M Sport coupé to give it its correct name.





Lagerlout

1,810 posts

236 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Kenny Powers said:
Logistics.

Most people , understandably, have no idea what is involved in mass production. It costs money to give you the choice of badge deletion. It also costs money to provide an ashtray. Every nut washer and bolt on a car is accounted for.

Car manufacturers are in the business of making money.
What, even Lotus?
9/10. biggrin

maurauth

749 posts

170 months

Friday 3rd July 2015
quotequote all
toohuge said:
Over here in the states, it makes sense.... so many cars are leased here that by grouping the options in packages it makes it a) much easier to produce on a large scale and b) upon retail, there are very few 'funny' spec'd cars.

MB is particularly bad at this though, we have a GLK and we wanted the rear view camera - not a huge ask. Although you need to spec premium package 1 (which includes a panoramic sunroof etc.) and media package which includes COMAND ... so all in all it was another 5 k!
Not sure about the PP1 requirement, but I'm guessing the correct loom for the camera comes as part of the all-in loom for what comes in that package.

You have to have comand because that's how the reversing camera is shown, without the command you have the smaller low-res screen and incompatible software.