Ambulance fine 115mph in a 50

Ambulance fine 115mph in a 50

Author
Discussion

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-33008967
ok you expect an ambulance may go a little quicker than the limit on a run, or maybe keep to the limit but hope other drivers let them by.

115mph in a 50. Begs the question should it be a 50?
(ETA probably a well known hot spot to have a camera)

Should there be automatic exemption any ambulance any time any place

Edited by saaby93 on Friday 24th July 00:24

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

157 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Kind of surprised someone got one to do 115mph, I can't imagine they stop that well though?

Rickyy

6,618 posts

219 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
Kind of surprised someone got one to do 115mph, I can't imagine they stop that well though?
I'd imagine it was a paramedic car rather than a full fat ambulance.

NelsonP

240 posts

139 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Ha. Think this rather neatly highlights the totally indiscriminate nature of modern speeding enforcement!

scorcher

3,986 posts

234 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
115mph in a 50. Begs the question should it be a 50?
(ETA probably a well known hot spot to have a camera)
Probably Somerset where we have miles of 40mph buffer zones, 24/7 20mph limits outside of schools and perfectly good A roads that were once NSL but, because speed kills, or there's a house on the side of the road, or a junction , they have all been dropped to lower limits. Luckily a lot of the bouncy single track B roads are still NSL.

Strawman

6,463 posts

207 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Rickyy said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Kind of surprised someone got one to do 115mph, I can't imagine they stop that well though?
I'd imagine it was a paramedic car rather than a full fat ambulance.
No doubt, the converted Volvo V70's they use can have an uprated D5 engine making 230BHP along with bigger brakes, suspension etc.

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Rickyy said:
GrumpyTwig said:
Kind of surprised someone got one to do 115mph, I can't imagine they stop that well though?
I'd imagine it was a paramedic car rather than a full fat ambulance.
Or one of the ultra-rapid response paramedic bikers.

CoolHands

18,606 posts

195 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
if it was 115 he should be prosecuted. Responding to an 'emergency' does not mean its ok to put everyone else at excessive risk. That's an indefensible speed imo.

Ste1987

1,798 posts

106 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
if it was 115 he should be prosecuted. Responding to an 'emergency' does not mean its ok to put everyone else at excessive risk. That's an indefensible speed imo.
What if doing that speed made the difference that the patient didn't die?

randlemarcus

13,518 posts

231 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
if it was 115 he should be prosecuted. Responding to an 'emergency' does not mean its ok to put everyone else at excessive risk. That's an indefensible speed imo.
There are no roads in the whole of the SouthWest where it's safe to do that speed? Highly doubt that. It entirely depends on the circumstances. Straight DC, no entries/exits, on a bike, no issue. Urban clearway middle of day in a proper ambulance (downhill, naturally smile ) no so much.

evilmiyagi

127 posts

109 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
if it was 115 he should be prosecuted. Responding to an 'emergency' does not mean its ok to put everyone else at excessive risk. That's an indefensible speed imo.
Paramedics / Technicians aren't trained to drive ambulances per say. They are trained to appropriately assess risks to both themselves and others. IMO, they are pretty damn good at it.

I'm sure that the speed wouldn't have been done 'just for the sake of it'.

EM

CoolHands

18,606 posts

195 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Ste1987 said:
CoolHands said:
if it was 115 he should be prosecuted. Responding to an 'emergency' does not mean its ok to put everyone else at excessive risk. That's an indefensible speed imo.
What if doing that speed made the difference that the patient didn't die?
it still wasnt worth it. There's one paramedic round here I've noticed that drives like a fking idiot. On a number of occasions I've seen him hurtling along at crazy speeds, shades on (natch), thinking he's michael schumacher. He clearly thinks he's great, but he's a moron. Just because you _might_ be about to save someone's life (mostly not though, eh) doesn't give you carte blanche to do what you want.

evilmiyagi

127 posts

109 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
it still wasnt worth it. There's one paramedic round here I've noticed that drives like a fking idiot. On a number of occasions I've seen him hurtling along at crazy speeds, shades on (natch), thinking he's michael schumacher. He clearly thinks he's great, but he's a moron. Just because you _might_ be about to save someone's life (mostly not though, eh) doesn't give you carte blanche to do what you want.
Unfortunately there will always be one to give the others a bad name... I would still maintain that he is the exception rather than the rule though smile

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
I think that's a point. You see those paramedic cars around here ( and everywhere) They need to get to the destination but in one piece. Theyre generally at NSL but maybe no more than that, relying on other motorists to allow them to make progress. They dont want to be the next call out or headline.
Do they have driver training?

Pete317

1,430 posts

222 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
randlemarcus said:
There are no roads in the whole of the SouthWest where it's safe to do that speed? Highly doubt that.
Motorways?

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
to the person suggesting that frontline ambulance staff aren;t trained to drive under emergency conditions

funny three weeks course that all NHS frontline staff ( apart from a handful of dinosaurs who scraped in when it was still optional) and staff working for decent Private / Voluntary sector providers do before being let loose on the road with blues ...

as to whether 115 in a 50 is acceptable depends ona coupel of things

1. what the road is like
2. is a political 50 when it should be NSL
3. organisational policy

Edited by mph1977 on Friday 24th July 09:46

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
to the person suggesting that frontline ambulance staff aren;t trained to drive under emergency conditions

funny three weeks course that all NHS frontline staff ( apart from a handful of dinosaurs who scraped in when it was still optional) and staff working for decent Private / Voluntary sector providers do before being let loose on the road with blues ...
3 weeks on driving?

The odd thing about this is we're not talking about a clear open road, it's a place they've found it necessary to place a camera. Or would that be a clear open road?


kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
I also think a lot of 40s and 50s are put there for noise pollution reasons more than safety ones. I suppose disturbing the locals occasionally to get to emergencies is viewed as acceptable.

TwistingMyMelon

6,385 posts

205 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Seen a trend on here and ttfacebook of some people really knocking ambulance drivers and whingeing about them. Not every poster, just a few arm chair experts having a whinge

When my daughter was near death, turned blue and couldn't breath from choking, holding her in our arms like she was going to die, the ambulance got to us in under 3 minutes, that's bloody brilliant, if it meant someone hit excessive speeds then so be it, any longer and we might not be so lucky

There was a women near me complaining "IS IT REALLY NECESEARY (spelt like that) FOR AMBULANCES TO USE SIRENS AT 6am SUNDAY MORNING" to which a lady replied on facebook; "Sorry that would have been going to me , my 8 year old son passed away, I hope you fell back asleep OK "

Hats off to paramedics and all frontline NHS staff, the nimbys and armchair ttfaces long with bureaucratic bullst must really grind them down

mph1977

12,467 posts

168 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
mph1977 said:
to the person suggesting that frontline ambulance staff aren;t trained to drive under emergency conditions

funny three weeks course that all NHS frontline staff ( apart from a handful of dinosaurs who scraped in when it was still optional) and staff working for decent Private / Voluntary sector providers do before being let loose on the road with blues ...
3 weeks on driving?

The odd thing about this is we're not talking about a clear open road, it's a place they've found it necessary to place a camera. Or would that be a clear open road?
yes 3 week driving course , it's the standard duration of response driving courses in the UK

Ambulance course is split into 2 qualifications the first week is an 'advanced driving ' type syllabus - the guys and girls who do PTS (outpatient and none emergency transfers) stop after that , then a week of driving using exemptions but no warning devices and a week of blues and twos ... which is asimilar structure to the police Response course.