Friday night topic - most power through most narrow tyres
Discussion
delta0 said:
Technically area of contact has no effect on grip. Obviously cornering and particularly wear benefit from some width.
Rotational forces (tractive forces) in either direction benefit from wider tyres. Reason is wider tyres run cooler than narrower tyres, so you can use a softer tyre compound and increase grip overall that way. Also the contact patch distorts less, as it's shorter and wider than a narrower tyre.Here's an article on it:
http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/handling/...
Autozine is a website I used to read a lot. I make silly mistakes sometimes on here, but I learned a lot from that site.
Index for 'technical school' that has a lot of really useful geeky stuff on it (and it all seems accurate):
http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/tech_inde...
My pug 205 cossie puts 468 bhp and 500ftlb of torque through 195/45s when in 2wd mode on the skyline box...well it doesn't very well, even with Supra rear diff on maxi weir kitted LSD, switch to 4wd and it does it easily as the centre diff locks and the front has a quaife atb....no worries then!
1100kilos. Road car, not racing car.
VERY. Old pic from Aces before I owned it, this is still in max power mag cover trim....it is very subtle now
1100kilos. Road car, not racing car.
Edited by Caddyshack on Wednesday 5th August 21:30
VERY. Old pic from Aces before I owned it, this is still in max power mag cover trim....it is very subtle now
Edited by Caddyshack on Wednesday 5th August 21:31
Steven_RW said:
I have a 2007 Mini Cooper S that ran 265bhp to 270bhp and 280lb/ft through 205 section tyres.
We broke a piston skirt and now have CP forged lower comp pistons and Carillo forged rods sitting ready as we rebuild the engine, including closing the deck so we can run it up and then add something like a T88 turbo in a compound setup under the boot floor.
It should be running quite a few bhp by then. No plan to change the tyres at this stage.
Cheers
RW
Hi, do you have a build thread for this?We broke a piston skirt and now have CP forged lower comp pistons and Carillo forged rods sitting ready as we rebuild the engine, including closing the deck so we can run it up and then add something like a T88 turbo in a compound setup under the boot floor.
It should be running quite a few bhp by then. No plan to change the tyres at this stage.
Cheers
RW
Thanks
Rob.043 said:
Plenty of wild numbers for modified cars, my stock E39 540 has 225 section tyres all round, and 286bhp.
225mm x2 tyres / 286bhp = 1.57mm per HP.
225mm x2 tyres / 286bhp = 1.57mm per HP.
littleredrooster said:
Easy to go back 40-50-60 years and say "Ooo - look at those skinny tyres!" FFS they were all like that!
The topic is in the current tense - who drives a car with skinny tyres?
I've already posted but my Challenger Hellcat is stock, current and factory fresh and puts out 707bhp through 275's. The topic is in the current tense - who drives a car with skinny tyres?
2.57bhp/mm or 0.34mm/bhp whichever way you want to quote it.
Winner winner chicken dinner - or is it???
James P said:
Would win the opposite competition I think. I recall LJKS writing that the 2CV was the most generously tyred car per horsepower based on (if memory serves) 29bhp and 125 section tyres. I'll get my coat ...
I never thought of that James.I think I had beter get my coat........http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/imgs/9.gif
Looking for new tyres, Michelin Alpin came up
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Michelin/Alpin-A...
Ok I'm not looking for Alpin tyres but it's noticeable that for a given spec of tyre that due to their curved profile they have a lower contact point than normal.
Lower contact point = greater pressure per square cm = greater grip? ala 2CV in a ploughed field
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Michelin/Alpin-A...
Ok I'm not looking for Alpin tyres but it's noticeable that for a given spec of tyre that due to their curved profile they have a lower contact point than normal.
Lower contact point = greater pressure per square cm = greater grip? ala 2CV in a ploughed field
Not stock, and not narrow, more a curiosity:
Those drag racing rail cars - Top Fuel in wiki:
10,000 is a given upper limit of hp,
47cm wide tyres, so 940mm width total,
This to my maths is 10.6hp/mm or 0.094mm/hp, whichever way you want to quote it.
Using 7000hp brings this down to 7.45hp/mm or 0.134mm/hp
Sources-
http://www.santapod.co.uk/dr_anat_topfuel.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Fuel
Those drag racing rail cars - Top Fuel in wiki:
10,000 is a given upper limit of hp,
47cm wide tyres, so 940mm width total,
This to my maths is 10.6hp/mm or 0.094mm/hp, whichever way you want to quote it.
Using 7000hp brings this down to 7.45hp/mm or 0.134mm/hp
Sources-
http://www.santapod.co.uk/dr_anat_topfuel.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Fuel
Cytokine said:
PHMatt said:
I was foolish enough to fit 205/35/18's to my MR2 Turbo that was tuned to about 320bhp at the time.
When I drive it sideways up a kerb, over a verge and into a fence I replaced those with 225's on the back.
It was annoying as the car really did need staggered wheels and tyres but there's not too many manufacturers out there that make wheels in different widths. I ended up having staggered tyres on the same width wheels (didnt come with OEM Wheels before anyone says it, they were gone long before I bought it)
I had 225's on the front of mine and 245's on the back and that was only an NA. Never went sideways unless you wanted to to like that. Could corner at amazing speeds without any fear.When I drive it sideways up a kerb, over a verge and into a fence I replaced those with 225's on the back.
It was annoying as the car really did need staggered wheels and tyres but there's not too many manufacturers out there that make wheels in different widths. I ended up having staggered tyres on the same width wheels (didnt come with OEM Wheels before anyone says it, they were gone long before I bought it)
IIRC the Marcos TSO was shod with 225/40/18 all round in a bit to keep things nice and progressive, with the optional performance pack on the LS2 engine, quoted power was something like 465 bhp. Wasn't exactly lacking in the grip department according to Evo's road test report, either...
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff