Friday night topic - most power through most narrow tyres

Friday night topic - most power through most narrow tyres

Author
Discussion

drewpasmith

91 posts

158 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
Probably a bit meaningless without a formula to weight the figures across cars, but:

'92 Mercedes 600 SEL: 408 Bhp/428 ft·lb through 235/60/16s

sparkyhx

4,152 posts

204 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
not standard, but my tuned 200sx was running 280ish thru 205's, then 320ish thru 225's

Thats 1.37bhp/mm followed by 1.42bhp/mm



j_s14a

863 posts

178 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
|I'm struggling to find the tyre dimensions, but the 1967 Corvette Stingray must be a contender. These were rumored to be running about 560hp. I know the rear wheels are 7.5" wide, so conceivably it could be a 205 or 215?

delta0

2,355 posts

106 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
gweaver said:
This might be true, up to the point at which the rubber starts to tear or vaporise.
Yes you will wear through the tyres quicker.

iloveboost

1,531 posts

162 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
delta0 said:
Technically area of contact has no effect on grip. Obviously cornering and particularly wear benefit from some width.
Rotational forces (tractive forces) in either direction benefit from wider tyres. Reason is wider tyres run cooler than narrower tyres, so you can use a softer tyre compound and increase grip overall that way. Also the contact patch distorts less, as it's shorter and wider than a narrower tyre.
Here's an article on it:
http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/handling/...
Autozine is a website I used to read a lot. I make silly mistakes sometimes on here, but I learned a lot from that site.
Index for 'technical school' that has a lot of really useful geeky stuff on it (and it all seems accurate):
http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/tech_inde...

Nigel_O

2,891 posts

219 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
up to 480-ish bhp through the front wheels, on 215 section Toyos, which aren't as good as the Contis that were fitted previously

Will easily will happily put down all the power from 2nd gear onwards in the dry. Slightly different story in the wet....

Caddyshack

10,818 posts

206 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
My pug 205 cossie puts 468 bhp and 500ftlb of torque through 195/45s when in 2wd mode on the skyline box...well it doesn't very well, even with Supra rear diff on maxi weir kitted LSD, switch to 4wd and it does it easily as the centre diff locks and the front has a quaife atb....no worries then!

1100kilos. Road car, not racing car.

Edited by Caddyshack on Wednesday 5th August 21:30


VERY. Old pic from Aces before I owned it, this is still in max power mag cover trim....it is very subtle now

Edited by Caddyshack on Wednesday 5th August 21:31

e46m3c

874 posts

155 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
How does 550bhp 255 fare?

Caddyshack

10,818 posts

206 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all


Better, recent, pic. The 468 bhp will be 530 with a better intercooler. This is chasing veyron power to weight on 195s

Garett

1,626 posts

192 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
My Saab 9000 had 240 bhp and 266 lb/ft pumped through its 195/65/15 shod front tyres. That could get a bit wayward if you weren't careful. No fancy diffs or electronic aids, just a hulking great thwack of turbocharged Swedish muscle, I loved that car!

mato

36 posts

180 months

Wednesday 5th August 2015
quotequote all
Steven_RW said:
I have a 2007 Mini Cooper S that ran 265bhp to 270bhp and 280lb/ft through 205 section tyres.

We broke a piston skirt and now have CP forged lower comp pistons and Carillo forged rods sitting ready as we rebuild the engine, including closing the deck so we can run it up and then add something like a T88 turbo in a compound setup under the boot floor.

It should be running quite a few bhp by then. No plan to change the tyres at this stage.

Cheers

RW
Hi, do you have a build thread for this?
Thanks

Boshly

2,776 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
Rob.043 said:
Plenty of wild numbers for modified cars, my stock E39 540 has 225 section tyres all round, and 286bhp.

225mm x2 tyres / 286bhp = 1.57mm per HP.
littleredrooster said:
Easy to go back 40-50-60 years and say "Ooo - look at those skinny tyres!" FFS they were all like that!

The topic is in the current tense - who drives a car with skinny tyres?
I've already posted but my Challenger Hellcat is stock, current and factory fresh and puts out 707bhp through 275's.

2.57bhp/mm or 0.34mm/bhp whichever way you want to quote it.

Winner winner chicken dinner biggrin - or is it???

Neil E 99

119 posts

115 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
James P said:
Would win the opposite competition I think. I recall LJKS writing that the 2CV was the most generously tyred car per horsepower based on (if memory serves) 29bhp and 125 section tyres. I'll get my coat ...
I never thought of that James.
I think I had beter get my coat........http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/imgs/9.gif

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
Looking for new tyres, Michelin Alpin came up
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Michelin/Alpin-A...

Ok I'm not looking for Alpin tyres but it's noticeable that for a given spec of tyre that due to their curved profile they have a lower contact point than normal.
Lower contact point = greater pressure per square cm = greater grip? ala 2CV in a ploughed field

Peanut Gallery

2,428 posts

110 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
Not stock, and not narrow, more a curiosity:

Those drag racing rail cars - Top Fuel in wiki:
10,000 is a given upper limit of hp,
47cm wide tyres, so 940mm width total,

This to my maths is 10.6hp/mm or 0.094mm/hp, whichever way you want to quote it.

Using 7000hp brings this down to 7.45hp/mm or 0.134mm/hp

Sources-
http://www.santapod.co.uk/dr_anat_topfuel.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Fuel

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
My 550i has 370ish bhp through standard 245/40/18. I believe you can also get a 550i SE with 17s which run a 225/50.

PHMatt

608 posts

148 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
Cytokine said:
PHMatt said:
I was foolish enough to fit 205/35/18's to my MR2 Turbo that was tuned to about 320bhp at the time.
When I drive it sideways up a kerb, over a verge and into a fence I replaced those with 225's on the back.

It was annoying as the car really did need staggered wheels and tyres but there's not too many manufacturers out there that make wheels in different widths. I ended up having staggered tyres on the same width wheels (didnt come with OEM Wheels before anyone says it, they were gone long before I bought it)
I had 225's on the front of mine and 245's on the back and that was only an NA. Never went sideways unless you wanted to to like that. Could corner at amazing speeds without any fear.
Try one with 320bhp on 205 Nankangs in the wet.

PHMatt

608 posts

148 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
Du1point8 said:
maybe this?

The wheels aren't driven - it's pushed along by thrust.

900T-R

20,404 posts

257 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
IIRC the Marcos TSO was shod with 225/40/18 all round in a bit to keep things nice and progressive, with the optional performance pack on the LS2 engine, quoted power was something like 465 bhp. Wasn't exactly lacking in the grip department according to Evo's road test report, either...

Boshly

2,776 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th August 2015
quotequote all
swerni said:
2 drives wheels not 1 wink

Still win by a good margin .
Not until the LSD cuts in wink

Ok fair enough smile