I saw a Mercedes G Wagon today.

I saw a Mercedes G Wagon today.

Author
Discussion

WarnieV6GT

1,135 posts

199 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Forget he was driving like a knob, and just think that he was actually driving something that made you look and take notice and even come on here about it. Weather you like it or hate it, you actually noticed it and remembered it.

It's rare you do that these days. It got me thinking yesterday when I saw a guy in his new 15 plate audi a4. Granted a nice car in it's own right, but I bet he must see at least 5+ people everyday driving the same car, perhaps a different colour, slightly different spec and maybe a bit smaller (A3 saloon) or bigger with the A6, but still the same car. How long can that car his just spent £25-30k on stay special once the newness has worn off?

Edited by WarnieV6GT on Monday 3rd August 09:48

Leeskiramm

36 posts

106 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
I saw some dreadful G-thing in London yesterday. I'm assuming the owner was Iranian going by the badly spaced plate GW5 1RAN. It was also wrapped in a horrible metallic purple/pink. It ddi sound bloody amazing though.

Mafffew

2,149 posts

111 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
I don't really 'get' them. But then I don't like most SUV/4x4 types, I think they're all pretty ugly things.

berlintaxi

8,535 posts

173 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
ArsE92 said:
ArsE92 said:
My son has a G63 and loves it. I'll try and dig out a picture.
thumbup

Gangsta rims!

Petrolhead95

7,043 posts

154 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Slow said:
3 miles to get to 95?

I know its not a rocket ship but a quick Google suggests 9.1 seconds 0-60.

That's not exactly slow for a car of its size.
That's slow, even for its size and weight.

ArsE92

21,013 posts

187 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
berlintaxi said:
ArsE92 said:
ArsE92 said:
My son has a G63 and loves it. I'll try and dig out a picture.
thumbup

Gangsta rims!
Braaaaaaaaaap

Slow

6,973 posts

137 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Petrolhead95 said:
Slow said:
3 miles to get to 95?

I know its not a rocket ship but a quick Google suggests 9.1 seconds 0-60.

That's not exactly slow for a car of its size.
That's slow, even for its size and weight.
Serious?

My focus would crack 60 in 11 seconds.
Old 300tdi discos would take like 16 seconds to hit 60.

Yes compared to the mighty 320d it is slow, but why the fk would you need it to be fast anyway?

akirk

5,389 posts

114 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
there are plenty of them that do sub 6 seconds, and even sub 5 seconds smile
and 9 seconds is hardly slow... I would assume that it is much faster mid range anyway as it doesn't have to propel 15 tonnes of metal off the line!

RobinBanks

17,540 posts

179 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Petrolhead95 said:
That's slow, even for its size and weight.
No, it's not.

Blaster72

10,837 posts

197 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
You can buy this g-wagon and be super cool (or look a right knob)



I agree with the OP, put them firmly in the totally hideous car camp. Along with the LR Defender (which is also hateful to drive) I just don't see the point.

Petrolhead95

7,043 posts

154 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Slow said:
Serious?

My focus would crack 60 in 11 seconds.
Old 300tdi discos would take like 16 seconds to hit 60.

Yes compared to the mighty 320d it is slow, but why the fk would you need it to be fast anyway?
It's a performance SUV. Look at the ML63 AMG, Range Rover V8, Audi Q7 V12. Look at the Phantom. They're fast for their size and weight. 9 seconds to 60 is not.

moffat

1,020 posts

225 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
A dirty big V12 BiTurbo G65 for me please as the family run around biggrin


Darko92

283 posts

111 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
My girlfriends dad has one - A G63 AMG in Grey. He gets about 10mpg around town if hes lucky and the thing is horrendously uncomfortable to sit in during drives around town, but I have to say when you're in it it just makes you feel so damn special - They are overpriced but they're overpriced for a reason. People seem to want them.

For what it's worth - I'd have a G63 over a RR/Defender/X5 any day, purely because I'd always find myself looking back to take a second glance when it's parked.

RobinBanks

17,540 posts

179 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Petrolhead95 said:
It's a performance SUV. Look at the ML63 AMG, Range Rover V8, Audi Q7 V12. Look at the Phantom. They're fast for their size and weight. 9 seconds to 60 is not.
It's not a 'performance SUV'. It's a 3.0 litre diesel.
The G63 and G65 could be considered a 'performance SUV' and they are much quicker 0-60.

I find it astonishing that you would compare the Mercedes with a 3.0 litre diesel V6 to the Audi with a 6.0 litre diesel V12. It's just about exactly HALF the engine.

Slow

6,973 posts

137 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Petrolhead95 said:
Slow said:
Serious?

My focus would crack 60 in 11 seconds.
Old 300tdi discos would take like 16 seconds to hit 60.

Yes compared to the mighty 320d it is slow, but why the fk would you need it to be fast anyway?
It's a performance SUV. Look at the ML63 AMG, Range Rover V8, Audi Q7 V12. Look at the Phantom. They're fast for their size and weight. 9 seconds to 60 is not.
Im talking about the one he saw, not the top g63.....

Petrolhead95

7,043 posts

154 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
RobinBanks said:
It's not a 'performance SUV'. It's a 3.0 litre diesel.
The G63 and G65 could be considered a 'performance SUV' and they are much quicker 0-60.

I find it astonishing that you would compare the Mercedes with a 3.0 litre diesel V6 to the Audi with a 6.0 litre diesel V12. It's just about exactly HALF the engine.
I thought it was an AMG G Wagon. Never seen any but the AMG line.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

137 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Petrolhead95 said:
Slow said:
Serious?

My focus would crack 60 in 11 seconds.
Old 300tdi discos would take like 16 seconds to hit 60.

Yes compared to the mighty 320d it is slow, but why the fk would you need it to be fast anyway?
It's a performance SUV. Look at the ML63 AMG, Range Rover V8, Audi Q7 V12. Look at the Phantom. They're fast for their size and weight. 9 seconds to 60 is not.
The model mentioned by the OP is the 3.0td with just over 200bhp. 9 secs to sixty doesn't seem at all bad.

It is in no way comparable with the mega power gas guzzlers you've listed above.

berlintaxi

8,535 posts

173 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
Petrolhead95 said:
RobinBanks said:
It's not a 'performance SUV'. It's a 3.0 litre diesel.
The G63 and G65 could be considered a 'performance SUV' and they are much quicker 0-60.

I find it astonishing that you would compare the Mercedes with a 3.0 litre diesel V6 to the Audi with a 6.0 litre diesel V12. It's just about exactly HALF the engine.
I thought it was an AMG G Wagon. Never seen any but the AMG line.
9 out of 10 times AMG on a Mercedes refers to the wheels and a bodykit not the engine.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
I see plenty where I work and would love a G63. They sound fantastic and have so much presence.

A properly built Merc is a thing of wonder - you need to live with one to appreciate it. They dont feel in any way disposable, unlike most cars these days.

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Monday 3rd August 2015
quotequote all
vtecyo said:
Obviously doing 95 in the outside lane of the motorway flashing at everyone. And as it came past I couldn't help but notice, it is a truly awful looking car. It's like someone has taken a Land Rover defender to the gym, taken the hinges off the doors and then given it to someone from Bradford with a chrome factory to bling up.

How do they sell any? If you want a Mercedes 4x4, surely you'd have the ML? Or even the GLA? As they're more car like and generally nicer. This G Wagon had some horrific chrome wheels on it as well (to match the 10 million candle drl's) so no chance it ever goes off road. And if you wanted something unnecessarily chav you'd have a hummer. Or a Range Rover sport. If you wanted a 'luxury' 4x4, you'd have a Range Rover, or an X5, or a cayenne.

This one was a G350 Bluetec as well which did make me chuckle a bit as he was obviously flashing people over as it'd taken him the previous 3 miles to get it to 95. I came to the conclusion that it's purely a status symbol thing.

Does anyone on here have one and can answer why they've actually managed to sell any?




Eta: previously the only one I've seen before this is when they were a bit more utilitarian. An older chap used to come shooting on the farm years ago and always turned u with a weird greeny coloured one that was plastered in mud. it was probably H Reg or so. 3 door. He loved it as a utility vehicle. Seems they've changed a bit.

Edited by vtecyo on Sunday 2nd August 23:10
A G350 is blingy......


Says the man who has a Honda Type R listed under his garage...


Probably the most riced up car on the worlds roads. confused