What C124PPY personalised plates have you seen recently?
Discussion
yellowjack said:
I'm ever so sorry, Jax my dear, but there's no way I'm defecating on demand for a complete stranger...
eta:
...and evidently the plate is no accident. It's a 2004 issue plate, yet it's on a car first registered in 2006. Blue Toyota Corolla T3.
Edited by yellowjack on Friday 9th December 08:12
Saw E14 NTB (correctly spaced) on a 90s Lotus Elan this morning. Would have put in good plates were it not for this 2010 MOT fail:
Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
NickCQ said:
Saw E14 NTB (correctly spaced) on a 90s Lotus Elan this morning. Would have put in good plates were it not for this 2010 MOT fail:
Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
So you saw a perfectly legally spaced plate and thought to do an MOT check to see if it had been displayed wrong in the past?Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
JamesRF said:
NickCQ said:
Saw E14 NTB (correctly spaced) on a 90s Lotus Elan this morning. Would have put in good plates were it not for this 2010 MOT fail:
Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
So you saw a perfectly legally spaced plate and thought to do an MOT check to see if it had been displayed wrong in the past?Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
NickCQ said:
JamesRF said:
NickCQ said:
Saw E14 NTB (correctly spaced) on a 90s Lotus Elan this morning. Would have put in good plates were it not for this 2010 MOT fail:
Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
So you saw a perfectly legally spaced plate and thought to do an MOT check to see if it had been displayed wrong in the past?Test date29 March 2010 Test ResultFail Odometer reading73,903 miles MOT test number9835 0818 0075 Reason(s) for failure
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff