300bhp per tonne

Author
Discussion

McSam

6,753 posts

175 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Paradaxos said:
I've seen what's happened here.

This hasn't gone exactly to plan.

The OP's table doesn't refer to 300bhp/tonne cars at all!

I er... am pleased to have uncovered this conspiracy...
I was a bit nonplussed as to the apparently random smattering of cars and figures in the table too hehe

B'stard Child

28,387 posts

246 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
FreeLitres said:
Yep, 300bhp/tonne is a little ambitious.

Time to change user names OP! wink
Quite. smile

Still a little way to go. Think it's around 230bhp/tonne at the moment.
It's my target for my project car and I don't plan on changing my user name (besides it's already taken wink )


T0MMY

1,558 posts

176 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Paradaxos said:
Well you can have a 1996 328i coupe for £2k...

And I think that's the cheapest car in the table in the OP.

And there are lots of posts claiming that's all you can use on the road.

cheap... performance... yes?
I managed to get a 300bhp/tonne car for £3750...do I win £5?

Out of interest, for all the slating MX5s get for being underpowered, in terms of bhp/tonne even the MK1s are in the same ballpark as a 328i.

pthelazyjourno

1,848 posts

169 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Hol said:
Most kit cars weigh in at 500-650kg, dependent on the donor parts used.

A bog standard 2.0 zetec on 45's gives 170bhp so that makes the requisite 300bhp figure very easily.
Some people will stick 300bhp plus engines in making 500bhp/ton drivers.


Not much cop for taking the wife and two kids out to collect the weekly shop though. Just like a motorbike.

Edited by Hol on Tuesday 1st September 20:33
Most kit cars used old Sierra parts and weigh a heck of a lot more than 500-600kg.

Surely it depends what it is - even the 7 type kit cars (none bike engined) tend to weigh a lot more than the 7s, the pig iron suspension components, big wheels etc all add up.

No doubt plenty of light kit cars around, but think "most" would be massively optimistic.

T0MMY

1,558 posts

176 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
pthelazyjourno said:
Most kit cars used old Sierra parts and weigh a heck of a lot more than 500-600kg.

Surely it depends what it is - even the 7 type kit cars (none bike engined) tend to weigh a lot more than the 7s, the pig iron suspension components, big wheels etc all add up.

No doubt plenty of light kit cars around, but think "most" would be massively optimistic.
When I bought my MNR it weighed 530kg. That's with big old Sierra suspension components, uprights and calipers, cheap heavy 15" alloys, Quaife reverse box, ridiculously heavy wing stays and a pretty substantial triangulated rollbar...basically no concession to maximise lightness at all. That was with a bike engine though so it would have been nearer 600kg with something like a Zetec in it. Looking at the spec of most other kitcars I see, you'd be talking 50kgs lighter easily with decent uprights, calipers, wheels etc. etc. which many of them have.

I think 550kg is a reasonable bet and 600kg more like an absolute maximum for the good modern 7 clones.

pthelazyjourno

1,848 posts

169 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
T0MMY said:
When I bought my MNR it weighed 530kg. That's with big old Sierra suspension components, uprights and calipers, cheap heavy 15" alloys, Quaife reverse box, ridiculously heavy wing stays and a pretty substantial triangulated rollbar...basically no concession to maximise lightness at all. That was with a bike engine though so it would have been nearer 600kg with something like a Zetec in it. Looking at the spec of most other kitcars I see, you'd be talking 50kgs lighter easily with decent uprights, calipers, wheels etc. etc. which many of them have.

I think 550kg is a reasonable bet and 600kg more like an absolute maximum for the good modern 7 clones.
Just got me looking at kit cars, this one definitely has more than 300bhp/ton!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvZtFUJHFV0&fe...

Dapster

6,927 posts

180 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
I had a Caterham 7 with a 150bhp K series so a bit less than 300/tonne with me on board. On twisty B roads and tight tracks nothing could hang on but on a motorway sliproad I would be outdragged by any junior hot exec (C Class AMG, S4 etc). Barn door aero and not much torque need to be considered too.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
R8VXF said:
Disagree.
Just stating an opinion. I took a 190HP Caterham to 250+. It was all about managing traction at the end. Having recently driven a 150HP version I would say it was far better balanced. Point and squirt or carrying apex speed, I enjoy the later more.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
Another consideration is that, in normal road driving, an engine is producing a fraction of peak power. In those conditions, the lighter car will often feel faster. At high speeds, the heavier but more powerful car will feel (and be) a lot faster.

I doubt I would use 300bhp/ton on the road, to be honest. Peak power would be attainable for how long before you got into big trouble? A handful of seconds?

What would be a typical 30-100mph time for a road car with that kind of p/w? About 5 seconds?

JockySteer

1,407 posts

116 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
R8VXF said:
Wills2 said:
300hp/tonne is a huge amount of power in a road car, you have to be looking at the latest 991 GT3/turbo to gain entry as a standard car and then on into the likes of Ferrari/Lambo/McLaren/R8 [insert mental car of your choice] etc...

Only a few of the AMG/M monsters get to the 300 mark.

VXR8 GTS is a "standard car" that makes the list smile Probably less than half the price of a GT3 (I have no idea what the Porsche costs).
Less than half the price and a lot less than half the car of the GT3!

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
JockySteer said:
Less than half the price and a lot less than half the car of the GT3!
Not a comparable car at all, really. The Mustang is a far better comparator. Those kind of cars are always cheap for the straight line performance.

R8VXF

6,788 posts

115 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
JockySteer said:
Less than half the price and a lot less than half the car of the GT3!
Not a comparable car at all, really. The Mustang is a far better comparator. Those kind of cars are always cheap for the straight line performance.
Not sure if serious? With a near 50/50 weight distribution, active torque vectoring, LSD, MRC and very good brakes, the VXR8 is very good in the twisties. Had no problem keeping up with a 996 Carrera and a Cayman R on a very spirited drive through the countryside a couple of weekends back. I think you really are underestimating its capabilities to be frank. Yes it is no GT3, but that was not the point I was making. It is a 55grand car that is in the 300BHP/Tonne bracket was my point anyway, and the Lotus V6 is cheaper still. The Mustang @ 288bhp/tonne is not included in this category wink

otolith

56,080 posts

204 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
JockySteer said:
Less than half the price and a lot less than half the car of the GT3!
It's about 128% of the car the GT3 is!

R8VXF

6,788 posts

115 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
otolith said:
JockySteer said:
Less than half the price and a lot less than half the car of the GT3!
It's about 128% of the car the GT3 is!
rofl

MG CHRIS

9,083 posts

167 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
pthelazyjourno said:
Hol said:
Most kit cars weigh in at 500-650kg, dependent on the donor parts used.

A bog standard 2.0 zetec on 45's gives 170bhp so that makes the requisite 300bhp figure very easily.
Some people will stick 300bhp plus engines in making 500bhp/ton drivers.


Not much cop for taking the wife and two kids out to collect the weekly shop though. Just like a motorbike.

Edited by Hol on Tuesday 1st September 20:33
Most kit cars used old Sierra parts and weigh a heck of a lot more than 500-600kg.

Surely it depends what it is - even the 7 type kit cars (none bike engined) tend to weigh a lot more than the 7s, the pig iron suspension components, big wheels etc all add up.

No doubt plenty of light kit cars around, but think "most" would be massively optimistic.
Where have you been for the past 5 years sierra parts have almost long gone, now the the mx5 and bmw are the donor of choice.
My exocet kit car running a 130bhp mx5 engine in mine which is 500kg so 260bhp/ton well be well over 400 when the turbo it fitted to it.
Also that is nothing compared to a 430bhp exocet just build and dynode in this country using a 1.6 m5 engine so that is near on 900bhp/ton then only thing to have that sort of power/ton a certain bikes.

R8VXF

6,788 posts

115 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
What would be a typical 30-100mph time for a road car with that kind of p/w? About 5 seconds?
The VXR8 does it in 8 seconds as part of a 9.9second 0-100. Went on to a top speed of 166mph at the mile marker in 31.3 seconds.

s m

23,223 posts

203 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
trashbat said:
The Alfa Giulia is supposed to fit the description. 501 bhp and 1500ish kg. If they pull that off then presumably a few more competitors will follow.
Let's hope they didn't use the same scales they used to weigh the Alfa 4C........else it'll be more like 1600kg in reality

trashbat

6,006 posts

153 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
s m said:
Let's hope they didn't use the same scales they used to weigh the Alfa 4C........else it'll be more like 1600kg in reality
In which case it would still be on the list smile

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
ORD said:
Another consideration is that, in normal road driving, an engine is producing a fraction of peak power. In those conditions, the lighter car will often feel faster. At high speeds, the heavier but more powerful car will feel (and be) a lot faster.

I doubt I would use 300bhp/ton on the road, to be honest. Peak power would be attainable for how long before you got into big trouble? A handful of seconds?

What would be a typical 30-100mph time for a road car with that kind of p/w? About 5 seconds?
If WOT was logged for most of us on the roads you would probably find it was under <5% of most journey times, especially with 300bhp/ton IMO.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 2nd September 2015
quotequote all
s m said:
Let's hope they didn't use the same scales they used to weigh the Alfa 4C........else it'll be more like 1600kg in reality
If the scales are made by the same people who make the Italian dyno's biglaugh