Are modern cars really faster than old ones?

Are modern cars really faster than old ones?

Author
Discussion

ManOpener

12,467 posts

170 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
I really do not understand how you and the others don't understand the question?
The fact that nobody seems to understand the question, including you (who, as I said earlier, failed to abide by his own arbitrary rules), should give you a hint it's incomprehensible ste.

schmunk

4,399 posts

126 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Old:



New:


luckystrike

536 posts

182 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
schmunk said:
Old:



New:

Looks much better on the smaller wheels at least.

TarpaTow

141 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Yes they are way quicker than old cars.

My BM 1 series is much quicker than even a 3 series from the 80s. It's also got amazing handling and brakes, much better than even 10 years ago.

Maybe its unfair to include BMs as they are specially developed for enthusiasts so will be better than most, but even my old Peugeot 206CC was quite some performer, but that was a different type of sports car so not a good comparison.

What about asking if new cars have a better image than old ones, a new BM shows you've made it, but if you drive an old one, even if it is a 3 series, people just think you can't afford a decent set of wheels

Some Gump

12,704 posts

187 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
sc0tt said:
yonex said:
Anyway...... Are these lions all African or a mixture?
Good point. Can someone please confirm?
Every thread. Every god damn thread. It's time we kicked racism out of PH for good. Thank god at least no-one's questioned the gender of the lions, or whether (shudder) one of them might you know bat for the other team.

schmunk

4,399 posts

126 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
TarpaTow said:
my old Peugeot 206CC was quite some performer, but that was a different type of sports car.
Does. Not. Compute.

s m

23,242 posts

204 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
yonex said:
MC Bodge said:
Isn't original question,
"As I can't afford a new car, can it somehow be argued that old ones are faster?"

Older ones might be more tricky / involving / fun, but even modern, 'normal' cars have very impressive road performance compared to those of 20-30 years ago.
This is it, entirely. Fifth Gear IIRC ran this test with an Integrale and E30 M3. As a machine to drive there is no comparison to some of the modern boring cars but pure speed, newer is quicker.
I think both the M3 and Integrale were a bit tired by their owners' admission and were trounced by a Colt CZT or similar

EVO did a similar test at Cadwell with stuff like the Corsa VXR, Clio 197 or similar etc and an Integrale - the Integrale was beaten there as well

Some Gump

12,704 posts

187 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
schmunk said:
Does. Not. Compute.
It goes 0-dogging in 3 flashes.

GroundEffect

13,844 posts

157 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Tyre technology alone.

Yes.

And comparing a BRZ to an RB5. lol.

Let's use the Ferrari comparison:

1996 Berlinetta = F355 (375BHP)
2016 Berlinetta = 488 GTB (670BHP)

Just a slight increase then...

PGNCerbera

2,934 posts

167 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
ManOpener said:
300bhp/ton said:
I really do not understand how you and the others don't understand the question?
The fact that nobody seems to understand the question, including you (who, as I said earlier, failed to abide by his own arbitrary rules), should give you a hint it's incomprehensible ste.
Nail. Head.

caelite

4,274 posts

113 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Robert Elise said:
caelite said:
Did you know that a Citroen 2CV traveling a 72mph
... is clearly not standard


Bah I was trying to cite this and got the numbers slightly off xD.

DanielSan

18,804 posts

168 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
TarpaTow said:


Maybe its unfair to include BMs as they are specially developed for enthusiasts so will be better than most, but even my old Peugeot 206CC was quite some performer, but that was a different type of sports car so not a good comparison.
BMW's really aren't developed for enthusiasts anymore, M cars aside, and without sounding harsh the 206cc is no sort of performer and definitely isn't in any way a sports car.

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
BMW's really aren't developed for enthusiasts anymore, M cars aside, and without sounding harsh the 206cc is no sort of performer and definitely isn't in any way a sports car.
He's obviously joking! See what he said about driving a new BMW meaning that you have 'made it'.

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
And the gap between normal cars and fast cars has reduced dramatically. I don't buy into this nonsense about a GTD being as fast as a Ferrari, but a boggo 2 litre diesel isn't massively slower than an entry level Porsche, Aston or whatever, and 3 litre diesels are about as fast.

Monkeylegend

26,443 posts

232 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
300bhp, you need to step back from the internet, get yourself a girlfriend and lose your virginity. You will find it quite liberating.

MC Bodge

21,649 posts

176 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
L
ORD said:
And the gap between normal cars and fast cars has reduced dramatically. I don't buy into this nonsense about a GTD being as fast as a Ferrari, but a boggo 2 litre diesel isn't massively slower than an entry level Porsche, Aston or whatever, and 3 litre diesels are about as fast.
Yes, the point is that a modern 'normal' car can be driven fairly quickly on the road by a half-decent driver with a high degree of confidence that it will stay on the road.

A front wheel drive 2.0 turbo diesel hatchback might not be what purists want, but they can be quick cross-country and comfortable (if not specified with overly-firm suspension and excessively low profile tyres). Handling is safe. more adjustable on the throttle might be desirable to some (I like it), but most people would just crash....

Sadly, really fast cars and bikes are becoming fairly irrelevant as road vehicles.

The Sort of thing that people tried to achieve through modification and tuning is now available off the shelf in a mid-range car.

delta0

2,355 posts

107 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
Yes much faster. Compare a basic focus to a basic escort or any other old cars. Compare modern hot hatches to old ones and you see huge differences in performance. You can buy a hot hatch today that is faster than super cars in the 80s.

Hungrymc

6,673 posts

138 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
Yes, the point is that a modern 'normal' car can be driven fairly quickly on the road by a half-decent driver with a high degree of confidence that it will stay on the road.

A front wheel drive 2.0 turbo diesel hatchback might not be what purists want, but they can be quick cross-country and comfortable (if not specified with overly-firm suspension and excessively low profile tyres). Handling is safe. more adjustable on the throttle might be desirable to some (I like it), but most people would just crash....

Sadly, really fast cars and bikes are becoming fairly irrelevant as road vehicles.

The Sort of thing that people tried to achieve through modification and tuning is now available off the shelf in a mid-range car.
But you can still go for a faster model, and still extract more from it (if that's the route you choose)

There is still plenty of room for seriously fast cars and seriously fast bikes.

rb5er

11,657 posts

173 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
TarpaTow said:
My BM 1 series is much quicker than even a 3 series from the 80s. It's also got amazing handling and brakes, much better than even 10 years ago.

Maybe its unfair to include BMs as they are specially developed for enthusiasts so will be better than most, but even my old Peugeot 206CC was quite some performer, but that was a different type of sports car so not a good comparison.

What about asking if new cars have a better image than old ones, a new BM shows you've made it, but if you drive an old one, even if it is a 3 series, people just think you can't afford a decent set of wheels
This has got to be a joke post. So much wrong.

delta0

2,355 posts

107 months

Thursday 3rd September 2015
quotequote all
rb5er said:
This has got to be a joke post. So much wrong.
I think so. A 3 series replaced the Mondeo for the "Mondeo man". Much in the same way the 1 series is now what the Focus once was. Pile them high and sell them cheap.