VW in trouble over alleged US emission test manipulations

VW in trouble over alleged US emission test manipulations

Author
Discussion

Escort Si-130

3,273 posts

181 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
For the VW fan boys



Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
JonnyVTEC said:
Pan Pan Pan said:

Diesel engined cars only represent about one third of all the cars on UK roads. Where do you suppose the rest of the pollution you bang on about comes from?
The other 2 thirds....

The point is what proportional of that is associated with either fuel type?
Nope, the pollution does not just come from the other two thirds, it also comes from buses, taxis, trains, ships, factories, houses, people, shops, power stations, anything in fact that burns a fuel, so what proportion of the `pollution' comes from diesel engined cars in the overall scheme of things. My view would be only a tiny tiny fraction.
yet some on here have jumped up ranting about banning all diesel cars. A bit over the top for a pro motoring website wouldn't you think?
Oh I forgot planes, they burn kerosene, are we going to call for those to be banned too?

Edited by Pan Pan Pan on Saturday 3rd October 11:29

Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
AW111 said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
No, I am saying that there seem to be some spittleflecked, naïve, idiots who seem to have developed a paranoia about diesel engined cars, who have either joined the ecof*ckwits in their quest to get rid of private cars, or are naively doing the ecof*ckwits work for them, in saying that diesel cars should be banned.
These idiots who are so short sighted, (that if they get their way and diesel engined cars do get banned) they cannot see, that once diesel engined cars are removed from the picture, the ecof*ckwits will start work on banning petrol engined cars, are these idiots going to help the ecof*ckwits in that task too?
As I have said several times before, Motoring (and those who enjoy cars, and motoring) doesn't need enemies, when it has `friends' calling for a ban on diesel cars in its midst.
Perhaps those who want diesel engined cars banned, should leave this site for good, they are certainly not Pistonheads. Perhaps they should join friends of Earth, the green party, or any other group, whose ultimate aim is to get rid of private cars regardless of what type of fuel it uses.
With the current and foreseeable future EV`s are not the answer, since in cradle to grave
emssions associated with bringing it to the point of use, electricity is the dirtiest domestic fuel available, which is why the government have imposed the highest fuel factor
on electricity, compared to all the other domestic fuels used in the UK.
Well good luck with your one man war on all who don't agree with you.

Maybe what motoring enthusiasts don't need is another of your spittle-flecked paranoid rants about how they are all out to get us, along with your shrill bleating about traitors in the PH ranks.

FFS get a grip.
And yet you say nothing about those who want to get a certain type of car banned from the roads? A bit of an odd stance from someone who (this being a forum for motoring enthusiasts) is presumably interested in cars and driving wouldn't you say?

AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
They certainly don't need your sort who sees nothing wrong with banning a certain type of vehicle owing to vague and unprovable myths that only diesel cars cause pollution. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Incidently several posters here have made the same point as me, so where do you get your one man war comment from? Is that as truthful as any other comments you have made?
More paranoia!

I have not said anything about banning diesels : you are jumping to delusions again.

Keep the hat on - it suits you smile

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Well this thread turned weird.

Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Oh, the irony!
Indeed, coming from someone who has seen fit to inflict over 17 thousand of their points of view on those using this site, the irony is quite rich.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
That isn't irony and how is he inflicting. If nobody 'inflicted' the site wouldn't exist would it. PPP you are coming across a bit mental.

Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Well this thread turned weird.
I am quite enjoying it. The twists and turns a post can take is fascinating, but one thing is sure, that no matter `what' the subject is, there will always be some who wish to take a diametrically opposed view. It is just in the nature of PH.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

138 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
They certainly don't need your sort who sees nothing wrong with banning a certain type of vehicle owing to vague and unprovable myths that only diesel cars cause pollution. There are none so blind as those who will not see.


If you can you point me to anywhere on this thread were someone has said diesel cars are the only source of pollution, please do.

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
Your problem is that you don't understand the science, and you have no sense of proportion, you're just believing/repeating propaganda factoids.

Diesel exhaust is no worse than petrol, it is different, but petrol emits far more other nasty carcinogens and makes them breathable. All modern cars are exceptionally clean, even the rigged diesel ones.


Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
They certainly don't need your sort who sees nothing wrong with banning a certain type of vehicle owing to vague and unprovable myths that only diesel cars cause pollution. There are none so blind as those who will not see.


If you can you point me to anywhere on this thread were someone has said diesel cars are the only source of pollution, please do.
Then why, as some have posted should diesel cars specifically be banned?
The true fruitcakes on here, are the ones who think diesel cars should be banned.

Edited by Pan Pan Pan on Saturday 3rd October 12:18

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
Then why, as some have posted should diesel cars specifically be banned?
Because they are a greater danger to public health than the equivalent petrol engined car?

Because skewed taxation has led to a huge population of the UK switching to diesel with a corresponding decline in air quality.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/calls-for-ac...

They should not be banned... but tax laws certainly need re-examined

kambites

67,580 posts

222 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
I think London (and other big cities) banning pre-Euro6 diesels would be a good thing, but it needs to include all internal combustion engines not just private cars.

Of course that will only help if cars like these VWs have their Euro-6 tickets revoked.

Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Then why, as some have posted should diesel cars specifically be banned?
Because they are a greater danger to public health than the equivalent petrol engined car?

Because skewed taxation has led to a huge population of the UK switching to diesel with a corresponding decline in air quality.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/calls-for-ac...

They should not be banned... but tax laws certainly need re-examined
How much of a greater danger to public health? bearing in mind all the other sources of pollution that have a bearing on this, and that only one third of cars on UK roads are diesel.
You need to be able to quantify and prove how much diesel cars specifically are increasing the danger to public health, but you cannot, because no one can.
Are you perhaps jealous of those who `might' have benefitted from the governments taxation of vehicles mess, and VW`s f*ck up?
Remember up till a few months ago diesel was dearer than petrol. and that the swing to diesel was the government`s (at the time) fault

Edited by Pan Pan Pan on Saturday 3rd October 12:32

kambites

67,580 posts

222 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
You need to be able to quantify and prove how much diesel cars specifically are increasing the danger to public health,
That, I think, is where you're wrong. If the government decides it wants to remove diesels from city centres it needs to "proof" of anything whatsoever.

TA14

12,722 posts

259 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
MarshPhantom said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
They certainly don't need your sort who sees nothing wrong with banning a certain type of vehicle
If you can you point me to anywhere on this thread were someone has said diesel cars are the only source of pollution, please do.
Then why, as some have posted should diesel cars specifically be banned?
The true fruitcakes on here, are the ones who think diesel cars should be banned.
Where are all of these quotes saying that diesel cars should be banned?

TA14

12,722 posts

259 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
but tax laws certainly need re-examined
This episode has highlighted the idiotic tax laws which concentraded on CO2 and those scientific advisors which advocated that approach are now saying that not only did it make non CO2 emissions worse it didn't improve the CO2 either. You are quite right, the taxation basis needs a complete overhaul. I don't see why we don't just have a flat rate per car. Fuel duty and VAT will suffice.

Pan Pan Pan

9,919 posts

112 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
kambites said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
You need to be able to quantify and prove how much diesel cars specifically are increasing the danger to public health,
That, I think, is where you're wrong. If the government decides it wants to remove diesels from city centres it needs to "proof" of anything whatsoever.
I am guessing you meant the government does `not' need proof of anything whatsoever?
It will just impose a ban, whether based on fact or fiction, like the government (at the time) encouraged people to switch to diesels. which they then did.
If anyone wants to have a go about diesels, they should have a go at the government which promoted their use.

herewego

8,814 posts

214 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Then why, as some have posted should diesel cars specifically be banned?
Because they are a greater danger to public health than the equivalent petrol engined car?

Because skewed taxation has led to a huge population of the UK switching to diesel with a corresponding decline in air quality.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/calls-for-ac...

They should not be banned... but tax laws certainly need re-examined
There hasn't been a decline in air quality, simply a slowdown in the expected improvement. Air quality has been improving for decades.
We just need to get the diesel emissions cleanup back on track that's all.

kambites

67,580 posts

222 months

Saturday 3rd October 2015
quotequote all
Most people having a go at diesels are having a go at the government which promoted their use.

We don't need any new rules or bans anyway, at least not with respect to cars. We just need the loop holes in the existing ones closed and then to have them enforced properly.

Edited by kambites on Saturday 3rd October 12:50