VW in trouble over alleged US emission test manipulations

VW in trouble over alleged US emission test manipulations

Author
Discussion

h0b0

7,616 posts

197 months

Wednesday 4th November 2015
quotequote all
for those thinking that VW were clean until now, it does not take long to dig up their murky past.

Guardian said:
Ferdinand Piëch, chairman of Europe's biggest carmaker, Volkswagen, denied yesterday any knowledge of a corruption and bribery scandal involving backhanders and prostitutes that occurred at the firm when he was its chief executive.

In a trial that has gripped the business world, Piëch told a German court that he was unaware of VW managers throwing lavish parties for union leaders and providing prostitutes from 1995 to 2005.

"I did not concern myself with this," said Piëch, one of Europe's most powerful business patriarchs and grandson of Ferdinand Porsche, founder of the luxury carmaker. Answering questions on the affair publicly for the first time since it broke in 2005, he said: "I was at no point during my time on the executive board aware of the abuse of expenses by the works council."
VW boss says he did not know of perks and prostitutes

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Wednesday 4th November 2015
quotequote all
h0b0 said:
Spending your spare cash on coke and hookers is frequently recommended on PH hehe

DonkeyApple

55,378 posts

170 months

Wednesday 4th November 2015
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
h0b0 said:
Spending your spare cash on coke and hookers is frequently recommended on PH hehe
Which is moronic.

You should use other people's cash. biggrin

swimd

350 posts

122 months

Wednesday 4th November 2015
quotequote all
EricE said:
Key paragraph:

Due to high load the sintered cam which drives the high pressure fuel injection pump and the vacuum pump in the affected vehicles, the camshaft lobe has the potential to unexpectedly shear off from the camshaft. If this happens, vacuum pump power will be lost so that the pump will not deliver further vacuum supply to the brake booster, and reduced engine power (limp home mode) will cause the Malfunction Indicator Light (MIL) to come on.

Unexpected, increased need for braking effort after the vacuum reserve has been depleted can lead to a crash without warning.eek

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

152 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
For me, I'd like to see Porsche ditch these low end models and refocus on selling performance only versions of their product range.
Before the scandals, things were looking good for this. Why cannibalize Audi's market share with overlapping products? Being part of VAG meant financial security, something they did not have when they started selling tractors again out of necessity. But now I'm afraid they will need to milk the Porsche brand for everything it has. Perhaps we are lucky that Müller is at the helm now as he will have some sympathy. Not the nicest job to have though...

Kolbenkopp

2,343 posts

152 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
sato said:
This whole thing has become really baffling as to why it has been handled so badly.

As soon as they found out the EPA were investigating them, the first thing they should have done is ring up whoever makes all their ECUs and get them to tell them exactly which ECUs have been supplied with coding in question. I cant workout why they are still finding out about more cheat software now. The second thing they should have done is appoint someone external to oversee the investigation. Quite why they think all these internal promotions are appropriate I don't know.
Agree, they aren't handling this well at all so far. A lot of claimed full transparency, but in practice only smoke and mirrors. The default reaction to blame politics applies here as well IMVHO smile. They are partially owned by the state, politicians are close to them and they are such a heavy weight they used to be untouchable. From a German perspective, this is almost our 'banking crisis' unfolding.

It won't be as easy as phoning up the ECU vendor though. The relevant software will have come from them. But they should (and I suspect they do) know exactly what they have put out when and where. My guess is they are just trying to play szalámitaktika as this has been very successful in the past. I hope Müller realizes that long term this will hurt them really bad. Especially if the EPA claims regarding the 3.0 engines and the problems with CO2 on some 'Bluemotion' boxes are true.


DonkeyApple

55,378 posts

170 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all

Buzz word

2,028 posts

210 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
swimd said:
EricE said:
Key paragraph:

Due to high load the sintered cam which drives the high pressure fuel injection pump and the vacuum pump in the affected vehicles, the camshaft lobe has the potential to unexpectedly shear off from the camshaft. If this happens, vacuum pump power will be lost so that the pump will not deliver further vacuum supply to the brake booster, and reduced engine power (limp home mode) will cause the Malfunction Indicator Light (MIL) to come on.

Unexpected, increased need for braking effort after the vacuum reserve has been depleted can lead to a crash without warning.eek
I can't read the whole article but get the feeling the highlighted section is a shade hysterical. Camshafts are normally a steel tube with pressed sintered lobes now. The vacuum pump is normally driven on the end via a sintered end piece, so frictional fit. If that sheared there would be no way for the driver to know. There is a chance if that happened on start up it would have not created enough vacuum to run the brake booster servo. So the first the driver would know is pressing the brake to find a very hard peddle. The car would stop just the same but with increased driver input. The car will not suddenly veer off the road and crash.

Cobnapint

8,632 posts

152 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
India concerned about emissions from VWs in Mumbai.... just brilliant.

rofl

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

229 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
EricE said:
Another day, another VW issue. This time not directly emission related but hey.

VW recalls 91.867 cars for camshaft problem

http://www.wsj.com/articles/volkswagen-recalls-91-...


(image from http://www.audi-sport.net)

Edited by EricE on Wednesday 4th November 13:12
I'm wondering why anyone is surprised by this. VW have had issues for years. Just look at the diesel injector recall of a few years ago.

As has been said many time on this forum, they are trading on a reputation made years and years ago. I personally don't think they build anything decent. It's all the touchy feely crap that gets the investment, sod the actual working oily bits.

Let's not forget the high oil consumption of their vehicles recently. I know people who bought new VW's years ago and took the car back to the dealers because of the oil usage. Apparently, everything was normal. This isn't one person, but a few who I know of.

Finally, we know a couple who bought a brand new Polo four years ago. It was their first brand new car. It spent most of the first two years of ownership back at the garage due to faults and st build quality. I can't understand why they didn't reject it. But that was up to them.

smile

DonkeyApple

55,378 posts

170 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
Cobnapint said:
DonkeyApple said:
India concerned about emissions from VWs in Mumbai.... just brilliant.

rofl
It is a little bit like complaining that someone has farted at the sewage works.

The Hypno-Toad

12,284 posts

206 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
SMMT registrations for October 2015 against October 2014.

VW: 13970 -9.0%

Skoda: 4924 -3.0%

Seat: 2338 -32.0% yikes

Audi: +2.20%

Before I even saw these figures it seemed to me that VAG are doing a very good job of trying to ring fence Audi as much as possible so that basically st doesn't stick to their most profitable volume brand. Looks like its working for now but it will be interesting to see how the rest of the year pans out.

icepop

1,177 posts

208 months

Thursday 5th November 2015
quotequote all
The Golf model still at number 3 in the charts, selling only a handful less than the Corsa. Mind you as pointed out, the sales figures in this respect still include the delay from pre-ordered cars, some of the higher spec cars having long lead times.

Maybe more importantly for the AUDI brand, BMW sales are up by 35'ish %.

boxedin

1,354 posts

127 months

Friday 6th November 2015
quotequote all
$1000 - $1250 in the USA for TDI owners, well, not really:

$500 spend anywhere and the rest up to $750 at VW.

http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2015/11/vw-tdi-...

Don't think it'll keep the American's happy especially if the offer comes with conditions relating to not suing VW.

EricE

Original Poster:

1,945 posts

130 months

Sunday 8th November 2015
quotequote all
New german article at Handelsblatt has some insight on the methods the technicians used to manipulate the CO2 emissions.

According to this article they mixed diesel to the engine oil to lower the viscosity of the oil (temporarily reducing friction and thus decreasing fuel consumption) and inflated tires to 3,5 bar for the tests. Their superiors knew none of this. biggrin

boxedin

1,354 posts

127 months

Sunday 8th November 2015
quotequote all
icepop said:
The Golf model still at number 3 in the charts, selling only a handful less than the Corsa. Mind you as pointed out, the sales figures in this respect still include the delay from pre-ordered cars, some of the higher spec cars having long lead times.

Maybe more importantly for the AUDI brand, BMW sales are up by 35'ish %.
The sales numbers during 2016 will be more telling.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Monday 9th November 2015
quotequote all
Well done VW. Well done.


So eps are no gong to test randomly in actual driving. Cars will not pass this at the levels set. So stricter levels or are they going to relax them?
"
According to the New York Times, the EPA is going to test all new cars—and 2015/16 diesel models—on actual roads. Previously, testing was done in a fixed location by putting the car onto rollers and entering test mode, which made it easy for the car’s software to detect the test, and put on its good-boy no-emissions hat."




http://gizmodo.com/epa-decides-to-start-properly-t...

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
random road testing... great stuff, we need to do the same here

Lab testing will still remain the benchmark for setting emissions rating, but the road testing will make sure there is not too much deviation and catch cheaters.

DonkeyApple

55,378 posts

170 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
boxedin said:
icepop said:
The Golf model still at number 3 in the charts, selling only a handful less than the Corsa. Mind you as pointed out, the sales figures in this respect still include the delay from pre-ordered cars, some of the higher spec cars having long lead times.

Maybe more importantly for the AUDI brand, BMW sales are up by 35'ish %.
The sales numbers during 2016 will be more telling.
It'll probably tell us exactly what it tells us every year which is that when you wave a shiny milk bottle top at a Brit and hold a debt contract out they will buy absolutely any old turd they can lay their childishly excited, spendaholic little hands on. biggrin

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 10th November 2015
quotequote all
Glad to see some good coming of all this. The tide is turning against diesel now and it can't come soon enough.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34731463