VW in trouble over alleged US emission test manipulations

VW in trouble over alleged US emission test manipulations

Author
Discussion

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
yes... but that's an argument for another thread.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

189 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
So just because it's petrol, it must be cleaner.

Yeah right.

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
Even large petrol engines produce far less harmful gases (to humans) than diesels. This is a scientific fact.

The only advantage diesel's have is in terms of Co2, which itself is harmless to humans but is the basis for taxation in various European countries.

Diesel's spew copious amounts of Nox into the atmosphere compared with petrols... a far more damaging agent and the main reasons diesel have struggled to sell in the US, due to heavy regulation.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

189 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Even large petrol engines produce far less harmful gases (to humans) than diesels. This is a scientific fact.

The only advantage diesel's have is in terms of Co2, which itself is harmless to humans but is the basis for taxation in various European countries.

Diesel's spew copious amounts of Nox into the atmosphere compared with petrols... a far more damaging agent and the main reasons diesel have struggled to sell in the US, due to heavy regulation.
CO2 is not harmless to humans.

Petrol engines also don't just emit CO2.

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
skyrover said:
Even large petrol engines produce far less harmful gases (to humans) than diesels. This is a scientific fact.

The only advantage diesel's have is in terms of Co2, which itself is harmless to humans but is the basis for taxation in various European countries.

Diesel's spew copious amounts of Nox into the atmosphere compared with petrols... a far more damaging agent and the main reasons diesel have struggled to sell in the US, due to heavy regulation.
CO2 is not harmless to humans.

Petrol engines also don't just emit CO2.
Petrol engines emit far less overall

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33254803

Co2 is completely harmless to humans.

EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

136 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
CO2 is not harmless to humans.
When is CO2 harmful to humans?

Warmfuzzies

3,989 posts

254 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
EskimoArapaho said:
Devil2575 said:
CO2 is not harmless to humans.
When is CO2 harmful to humans?
When the concentration level is too high???

Dunit

637 posts

206 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
I can't see VW surviving this or Merkel even wanting to bail them out.
They are already asking for leniency with the fine saying the 60 billion would bankrupt them.
But this is only one civil action ! Every state and city could file for compensation as well as all the owners.
Let's not forget they took BP to the cleaners over what was a accident, But VW committed Fraud and left themselves wide open!
Regarding the US showing leniency ? Not so long ago the biggest car company in the world was GM but first Toyota and then VW pushed them back to third place.
Toyota sales have been damaged by some very costly recalls in the states and now VW gift the US this chance to do something far more damaging.
Plus Australia is going to follow suit with the compensation claims as well as breaking various state laws.

lostkiwi

4,584 posts

125 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
Warmfuzzies said:
EskimoArapaho said:
Devil2575 said:
CO2 is not harmless to humans.
When is CO2 harmful to humans?
When the concentration level is too high???
From Wikipedia:
CO2 is an asphyxiant gas and not classified as toxic or harmful in accordance with Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals standards of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe by using the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. In concentrations up to 1% (10,000 ppm), it will make some people feel drowsy and give the lungs a stuffy feeling. Concentrations of 7% to 10% (70,000 to 100,000 ppm) may cause suffocation, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen, manifesting as dizziness, headache, visual and hearing dysfunction, and unconsciousness within a few minutes to an hour.

CO2 poisoning was a major concern in WW2 submarines and submarines were lost either directly or indirectly as a result of CO2 concentations in the air.

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

184 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
lostkiwi said:
From Wikipedia:
CO2 is an asphyxiant gas and not classified as toxic or harmful in accordance with Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals standards of United e Nations Economic Commission for Europe by using the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. In concentrations up to 1% (10,000 ppm), it will make some people feel drowsy and give the lungs a stuffy feeling. Concentrations of 7% to 10% (70,000 to 100,000 ppm) may cause suffocation, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen, manifesting as dizziness, headache, visual and hearing dysfunction, and unconsciousness within a few minutes to an hour.

CO2 poisoning was a major concern in WW2 submarines and submarines were lost either directly or indirectly as a result of CO2 concentations in the air.
Just to be safe, I think it better if we got rid of all the CO2 in the atmosphere. You can't be too careful....

lostkiwi

4,584 posts

125 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
V88Dicky said:
lostkiwi said:
From Wikipedia:
CO2 is an asphyxiant gas and not classified as toxic or harmful in accordance with Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals standards of United e Nations Economic Commission for Europe by using the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. In concentrations up to 1% (10,000 ppm), it will make some people feel drowsy and give the lungs a stuffy feeling. Concentrations of 7% to 10% (70,000 to 100,000 ppm) may cause suffocation, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen, manifesting as dizziness, headache, visual and hearing dysfunction, and unconsciousness within a few minutes to an hour.

CO2 poisoning was a major concern in WW2 submarines and submarines were lost either directly or indirectly as a result of CO2 concentations in the air.
Just to be safe, I think it better if we got rid of all the CO2 in the atmosphere. You can't be too careful....
They're trying. Epileptic cars are the future apparently....

bobtail4x4

3,717 posts

110 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Even large petrol engines produce far less harmful gases (to humans) than diesels. This is a scientific fact.

.
bullfodder, try sitting in an enclosed garage with your petrol engine running, after half an hour repeat using a diesel, or dont, as you would be dead,

the other way round a diesel would make you unwell but not kill you.

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
bobtail4x4 said:
skyrover said:
Even large petrol engines produce far less harmful gases (to humans) than diesels. This is a scientific fact.

.
bullfodder, try sitting in an enclosed garage with your petrol engine running, after half an hour repeat using a diesel, or dont, as you would be dead,

the other way round a diesel would make you unwell but not kill you.
Catalytic converter should sort that little issue out wink

liner33

10,695 posts

203 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
If anyone doubts the impacts of petrol engined cars on the environment you only need to look at LA and the impact on children's health due to the clean air act

http://www.marketplace.org/2014/07/14/sustainabili...

http://www.wsj.com/articles/los-angeles-sees-healt...

skyrover

12,674 posts

205 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
Good point... This is exactly why diesel passenger vehicles are nigh on banned from sale in California

liner33

10,695 posts

203 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Good point... This is exactly why diesel passenger vehicles are nigh on banned from sale in California
If they weren't before they will be now wink

spaximus

4,233 posts

254 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
The Americans see this as a chance to kick VW, They are unashamedly protectionist in their outlook and seeing as this has been filed in Detroit, is more than significant as the imports, being better than home produced, have decimated the US car industry.
Will VW survive? It will be a long old haul and the chance of free money for States and individuals will make the BP fiasco seem cheap, but I hope they do as the implications for the EU if they fall over will be huge.
Perhaps there is an equivalent of chapter 11 protection that US companies use for VW to stave this off

EskimoArapaho

5,135 posts

136 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
lostkiwi said:
Warmfuzzies said:
EskimoArapaho said:
Devil2575 said:
CO2 is not harmless to humans.
When is CO2 harmful to humans?
When the concentration level is too high???
From Wikipedia:
CO2 is an asphyxiant gas and not classified as toxic or harmful in accordance with Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals standards of United Nations Economic Commission for Europe by using the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. In concentrations up to 1% (10,000 ppm), it will make some people feel drowsy and give the lungs a stuffy feeling. Concentrations of 7% to 10% (70,000 to 100,000 ppm) may cause suffocation, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen, manifesting as dizziness, headache, visual and hearing dysfunction, and unconsciousness within a few minutes to an hour.

CO2 poisoning was a major concern in WW2 submarines and submarines were lost either directly or indirectly as a result of CO2 concentations in the air.
Those extreme levels were not present in the Earth's atmosphere for millions of years (if ever). But right now CO2 is at 400ppm (up from about 280ppm before the industrial revolution), and the biggest problems will happen when it falls significantly.

CO2 is required for plants to grow. At 150ppm, IIRC, plants start to die. It's the building block of life, but it's been the easiest target for climate evangelists.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
EskimoArapaho said:
Those extreme levels were not present in the Earth's atmosphere for millions of years (if ever). B.
laughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaugh

boxedin

1,354 posts

127 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
spaximus said:
The Americans see this as a chance to kick VW, They are unashamedly protectionist in their outlook and seeing as this has been filed in Detroit, is more than significant as the imports, being better than home produced, have decimated the US car industry.
Will VW survive? It will be a long old haul and the chance of free money for States and individuals will make the BP fiasco seem cheap, but I hope they do as the implications for the EU if they fall over will be huge.
Perhaps there is an equivalent of chapter 11 protection that US companies use for VW to stave this off
I disagree. I don't see Honda, Mazda, Toyota et al being buried after airbag-gate ( 3rd party supplier to be fair ).

Its very simple, VW have committed fraud and despite being given ample opportunity to sort their house out, failed.

Tough, this is the end of diesel in the USA and its a shame the EU aren't taking a similar approach with VW and diesel in general.