How Can / Will VW fix all those dodgy engines?

How Can / Will VW fix all those dodgy engines?

Author
Discussion

CRA2Y

Original Poster:

2,632 posts

205 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
Ok, so next year several million cars will be returned to VW dealers, and those cars have an engine incapable of meeting legal emission levels without cheating (according to VW insiders).

What will they do? It seems that only an engine replacement will fix the problem. Or will they fix some new exhaust, and cut emissions and BHP by 50%...

Has anyone any ideas on what their options actually are?

smithyithy

7,223 posts

118 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
Remap

battered

4,088 posts

147 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
As above, a remap/rechip. VW already offer the same engine in a variety of outputs and with emissions to suit various territories and different regs. The aftermarket boys offer other chips with more power and sometimes even more economy at the same time (a mate has this on his Passat, and yes it is one of the affected engines). This is nothing new.

GC8

19,910 posts

190 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
Emissions may come out of the exhaust, but altering the exhaust wont fix the problem OP!

LankyLegoHead

749 posts

132 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
It's software, so they'll have to come up with some new software. I believe there was a car website that have removed the rogue programming to see the results? Someone will share the video I'm sure.

budgie smuggler

5,376 posts

159 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
I thought the problem was that the NOX reducing hardware they had was not capable of doing the job full time (owing to a small tank of the chemical needed) or something?

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
No-one knows for sure, yet.

Whatever solution VW are proposing will probably vary by territory and the applicable laws.

Bennet

2,119 posts

131 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
I'm fairly confident it will be petrol conversion.

hairyben

8,516 posts

183 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
budgie smuggler said:
I thought the problem was that the NOX reducing hardware they had was not capable of doing the job full time (owing to a small tank of the chemical needed) or something?
Is the problem restricted to needing the chemicals and telling the car to use them full time rather than in test mode, ie is the car capable of running full time in a mode that would pass the tests?

trickywoo

11,756 posts

230 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
I'd put money on it not being just a software update and if it is I'll put the same money on the car performing no where near as well as it did before this 'fix'.

Logic says there must have been a fundamental benefit to using the defeat software so how is some other software going to give the same performance / mpg etc but meet the same emissions?

DoubleByte

1,249 posts

266 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
hairyben said:
budgie smuggler said:
I thought the problem was that the NOX reducing hardware they had was not capable of doing the job full time (owing to a small tank of the chemical needed) or something?
Is the problem restricted to needing the chemicals and telling the car to use them full time rather than in test mode, ie is the car capable of running full time in a mode that would pass the tests?
One of our cars is on the list and doesn't use any kind of chemical additive...... well, not that I know of biggrin

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
If the EA189 has an air throttle (most modern diesels do), then they could reduce air and increase EGR volume to lower NOx production, at the expense of power and possibly CO2.

normalbloke

7,443 posts

219 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
If the EA189 has an air throttle (most modern diesels do), then they could reduce air and increase EGR volume to lower NOx production, at the expense of power and possibly CO2.
Plus at the expense of the EGR, because we know how reliable the VW EGRs have been historically....

mcford

819 posts

174 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
If it was that easy to do it with a remap, why didn't they do it in the first place?

battered

4,088 posts

147 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Emissions may come out of the exhaust, but altering the exhaust wont fix the problem OP!
Well, bits of the exhaust are key to fixing the problem.

To OP - have a look here http://www.greencarcongress.com/2015/09/20150921-v...
and here http://www3.epa.gov/ttncatc1/dir1/fnoxdoc.pdfand learn some of the technology involved. It's complex, there's some big chemistry going on there.

When you have this background reading under your belt (and brace yourself, there's plenty of it) then it's worth rejoining the discussion to talk about LNT systems, SCR systems, urea injection, Euro 5, Euro 6, Gen 1/2/3, Bin 5 and so on. If all of this sounds like too much trouble, then leave it, because it's heavy on the science and even when you understand it nobody is being very clear on exactly what the fudge software does and how it does it. I have a few ideas but they are based on guesswork having spent a bit of time studying the chemistry of what's going on and the constraints on the systems. I suspect that in operation outside test mode the system injects much less urea solution in order to reduce refill frequency and possibly increase catalyst life, but this is a guess. Of one thing I am sure - I'm not messing with this technology unless I absolutely have to, because this stuff is just dying to go wrong and hand you a big bill.

Happy reading, and if you're back in less than an hour I'll know you haven't bothered. :-)


Edited by battered on Wednesday 7th October 18:18

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
mcford said:
If it was that easy to do it with a remap, why didn't they do it in the first place?
CO2, fuel economy, drivability.

Blaster72

10,827 posts

197 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
To meet the US emissions regs they needed more exhaust gas recirculation meaning bigger particulate filters which would have needed alterations to the floorplan structure to fit them in (this suggestion from Autocars article last week).

It looks like the won't be able to meet the US regs with just a remap so who knows what will happen there, I can't imagine a redesign and retrofit of that many cars. VW look to be in serious danger because of this scam.

The sad fact is that the cars are incredibly clean anyway and have come on in leaps and bounds in just a few short years.

I'd love to read the real story behind how and why this all came out recently given the research was sat there for all to see 18 months ago.

I wonder if the team behind the scam will ever face criminal charges for what they have done to VW.

With these feet

5,728 posts

215 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
Stick petrol engines in them!

mcford

819 posts

174 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
CO2, fuel economy, drivability.
So all of these are going to be affected by the 'fix'? Or are they just going to remove the offending code, keeping all of these intact and ignore the original requirements that the engines had to meet to allow the cars to be sold?

LotusOmega375D

7,601 posts

153 months

Wednesday 7th October 2015
quotequote all
What if an owner doesn't want VW to change anything on their car? Would that present a problem?