RE: Fiat 124 - first pics
Discussion
Fetchez la vache said:
SturdyHSV said:
JimiGT said:
Having said that, I do think Abarth made a great job of the 500 (although I am biased) so maybe there is hope yet!
Clearly a subscriber to the mantra that although you can't polish a turd, you can roll it in glitter With the 500 they knew their market, and hit their target full on. God only knows what's gone on with this one though...
Triumph Man said:
SturdyHSV said:
Hopefully by the time it gets to journalists for reviews the human race will have come up with a word to describe that level of disappointment.
It's like seeing a hot woman's face on POF, then the anticipation builds, but when you meet up he's got a beard.It needs a 1,5 inch drop and a little fatter rims, like all Miatas before.
It is not the stunner Pininfarina offered with the duettotanta concept. But you can't expect Marchionne to suddenly have eyes for candy. After the horrible "Giulia" I am rather pleased with where the 124 is heading. The bonnet should be smoouthed out, new rims and that would be enough for me.
There are not thaaat many choices at the moment. Even the Z4 has lost its mojo with the second gen.
Martin
It is not the stunner Pininfarina offered with the duettotanta concept. But you can't expect Marchionne to suddenly have eyes for candy. After the horrible "Giulia" I am rather pleased with where the 124 is heading. The bonnet should be smoouthed out, new rims and that would be enough for me.
There are not thaaat many choices at the moment. Even the Z4 has lost its mojo with the second gen.
Martin
Axionknight said:
Ved said:
No contest in terms of looks. KO to Japan:
Without a doubt IMOI'd like to add that this new Fiat 124 is not about following in the footsteps of the Barchetta. It is about having access to the largest single market for classical two-seat roadsters.
As the Barchetta was never engineered or certified for sale in the US, car buyers under the age of 40, in that market, are unlikely to associate Fiat with two-seat roadsters.
Re-skinning somebody else's US-approved product provides turnkey access to engineering and crash-worthiness. At a low cost (albeit with questionable margin).
Ironically, this low cost comes at a very high price. As we see today in the design constraints that come with re-skinning.
Perhaps Fiat finances allowed for nothing else. To me, this product resembles what is called a Hail Mary pass.
kapiteinlangzaam said:
I think itll probably sell well in the USA, as IMHO they dont seem to care as much what their cars look like
That's why, whenever people go on holiday to America, they are lulled to sleep by the preponderance of rather anonymous, egg-shaped cars which mimic the Germans.Yeah. That's right.
This is what happens when a committee of muppets all answering to an Accountant decide the design of a car...
I was going to say it looked Korean, but that would be a big disservice to the standard of contemporary Korean auto design...
With the leeching of captial from the Ferrari IPO, the improbable propositions to GM, and product like this you have to worry about the FCA Group... I don't think they are going to be with us much longer...
I was going to say it looked Korean, but that would be a big disservice to the standard of contemporary Korean auto design...
With the leeching of captial from the Ferrari IPO, the improbable propositions to GM, and product like this you have to worry about the FCA Group... I don't think they are going to be with us much longer...
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff