Fastest you can go for £3500

Fastest you can go for £3500

Author
Discussion

paulwoof

1,610 posts

155 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
Bang on budget although now sold.

Completely impractical but so humorous.

http://www.driftworks.com/forum/drift-cars-sale-pr...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw2FKWoAnEc

neil-935ql

1,083 posts

106 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
No mention of the truly great Clio 182 ?? Fast , fun and kind of practical and for 3.5k a really nice example can be bagged

T0MMY

1,558 posts

176 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
trickywoo said:
That being the case it'll need about 2000bhp to crack 17mph with the st aero.
Well I wouldn't go that far but just as with motorbikes, the top speed is very poor in comparison to the 0-60 or 0-100 times. Top speed is about 130mph which is indeed relatively slow but then again, how often do you go above 130mph? laugh

Olivera

7,142 posts

239 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Mk1 leon cupra r. Easy 270bhp with a remap and miles better than a st old wobbly saab in the handling department.

longshot

3,286 posts

198 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
neil-935ql said:
No mention of the truly great Clio 182 ?? Fast , fun and kind of practical and for 3.5k a really nice example can be bagged
They're quick but not fast.


xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
T0MMY said:
trickywoo said:
That being the case it'll need about 2000bhp to crack 17mph with the st aero.
Well I wouldn't go that far but just as with motorbikes, the top speed is very poor in comparison to the 0-60 or 0-100 times. Top speed is about 130mph which is indeed relatively slow but then again, how often do you go above 130mph? laugh
Motorbike top speeds are very poor? Most (if not all) litre sports bikes (and sports tourers of the Hayabusa's ilk) will be limited to 186mph. For a £15k (or less) bike, I wouldn't call that "very poor". Even then, the speed limiters can be circumvented, and (gearing dependent) those bikes would push 200mph from the factory.

And as per the second post, the first gen of Hayabusa had a quoted top speed of 194.

feef

5,206 posts

183 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
T0MMY said:
trickywoo said:
That being the case it'll need about 2000bhp to crack 17mph with the st aero.
Well I wouldn't go that far but just as with motorbikes, the top speed is very poor in comparison to the 0-60 or 0-100 times. Top speed is about 130mph which is indeed relatively slow but then again, how often do you go above 130mph? laugh
I'd say that might be true for a lardy tourer or a custard making potato-potato noises, but certainly not of most sporty bikes

Even my FJR1300 with full luggage on will crack 140 and that's no sports bike

BrassMan

1,484 posts

189 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Passenger ride in an EE Lightning? Can't see a price.

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

191 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Honda Integra type R?

Bradley1500

766 posts

146 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Got to be a Jaguar XJR.

5.3 seconds to 60MPH with 370BHP and limited to 155MPH. I don’t think you’ll go quicker for this money unless you’re considering bikes and kit cars.

techniques

40 posts

113 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
james_gt3rs said:
Honda Integra type R?
Not £3500.

However, Civic type r. EP3.

200bhp. 0-60mph = 6.8

30mpg.

Reliable Honda. Cheap parts/repairs compared to Mercedes/Beamers people are recommending.

I'm at the same budget and it is what I will be going for Early next year.

E.g.
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2015...

egor110

16,860 posts

203 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
longshot said:
neil-935ql said:
No mention of the truly great Clio 182 ?? Fast , fun and kind of practical and for 3.5k a really nice example can be bagged
They're quick but not fast.
On a b road or tight twisty track there fast but on dual carriageway,motorways or big tracks like silverstone or Thruxton there not fast.

Good value for money and great fun though for a every day pocket rocket though.

If 0-60 is what your using as a fast car , ignore the Clio 182 get the smaller 172 cup as its 0-60 is a bit quicker ( if that's important to you)

Edited by egor110 on Tuesday 1st December 10:45

R8Steve

4,150 posts

175 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
I would advise against an RX8. They are very problematic, terrible on fuel and not that fast at all.

I bought mine as a second car and they do look good but as far as driving experience/reliability goes it's one of the worst cars i've ever had (and i've had over 70 cars!)

TiminYorkshire

514 posts

219 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Bradley1500 said:
Got to be a Jaguar XJR.

5.3 seconds to 60MPH with 370BHP and limited to 155MPH. I don’t think you’ll go quicker for this money unless you’re considering bikes and kit cars.
Great cars, I had one (supposedly with a different pulley on the supercharger set up)and do miss it. On a long run (Slovakia and back)at 90-140 leptons it averaged 23 mpg, around the houses it averaged 17 mpg.

Benbay001

5,796 posts

157 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
feef said:
I'd say that might be true for a lardy tourer or a custard making potato-potato noises, but certainly not of most sporty bikes

Even my FJR1300 with full luggage on will crack 140 and that's no sports bike
he said in comparison to 0-60. Which is true. A veyron has similar 0-60 as a zxr1400 but a top speed 50mph higher

BuzzBravado

2,944 posts

171 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Benbay001 said:
e said in comparison to 0-60. Which is true. A veyron has similar 0-60 as a zxr1400 but a top speed 50mph higher
You mean a ZZR1400?

Prof Prolapse

16,160 posts

190 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Fast straight line or actually fast where it counts?

Bike license and a hypersports/supersports bike would still be your quickest option by a significant margin.

Back to cars, I'm still backing the old Subarau's unless you're going to drive lots of long straight lines at prison speeds.

Bradley1500 said:
Got to be a Jaguar XJR.

5.3 seconds to 60MPH with 370BHP and limited to 155MPH. I don’t think you’ll go quicker for this money unless you’re considering bikes and kit cars.
Just don't try and turn it.

I seem to recall being able to get to 170 if you slipped the J-Gate, but perhaps I'm remembering things.




Speed addicted

5,574 posts

227 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Benbay001 said:
feef said:
I'd say that might be true for a lardy tourer or a custard making potato-potato noises, but certainly not of most sporty bikes

Even my FJR1300 with full luggage on will crack 140 and that's no sports bike
he said in comparison to 0-60. Which is true. A veyron has similar 0-60 as a zxr1400 but a top speed 50mph higher
Bikes do have fairly crap aerodynamics when compared to (even mundane) cars. But to fix them you would need to take away most of what makes bikes fun in the first place.

soad

32,896 posts

176 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
BuzzBravado said:
Benbay001 said:
e said in comparison to 0-60. Which is true. A veyron has similar 0-60 as a zxr1400 but a top speed 50mph higher
You mean a ZZR1400?
Ninja ZX-12R?

crusty

752 posts

220 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
One of these http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1999-AUDI-S4-QUATTRO-BLU...

I have had two, and loved them both.

Spend the change going to MRC for a health check and a map