RE: VW Golf R vs. its own hype

RE: VW Golf R vs. its own hype

Author
Discussion

400 horse in in hand

1 posts

168 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
"Is expectation the only thing the all-conquering Golf R can't out-accelerate?"

I remember it struggled against a manual M135i driven by someone with dodgy knees & clown feet.

Never did see the video?

3/4 if I remember correctly.


Selmer Mk6

245 posts

128 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
I think the Golf R is the best hatch all-round, extremely fast, frugal, well built etc. However, I think some owners think that the car is actually better than it is. It is competent.

The price now does seem to be irrelevant (with the leases) but for someone who would like to buy one outright it would be financial madness. How many owners will actually buy their car after the lease end?

There is room for all types of car. However, for me I want a hot hatch that cannot be mistaken for the bog standard version. Unfortunately, as good as they may be, Golfs, BMWs, Mercs and Audis are too bland for top money. If we actually look at the price for a moment and forget about leasing, a decent spec car cost £34k plus. I see R's on Autotrader for £36K plus. Who is going to buy one? The next generation Golf, 0-60 3.5 secs? 170 mph, but will still look the same.

long live the Golf, otherwise we would have nothing to talk about!

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
I'd be much more excited by the prospect of owing the new Focus RS.

k-ink

9,070 posts

180 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
I'd far rather have an RS3. At least they sound great and look much more interesting, yet are still restrained (compared to the yobbo cars like Focus, Civic, etc).

Gregmitchell

1,745 posts

118 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
for £230 a month find me a better new car.... didn't think so....

andrewparker

8,014 posts

188 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
k-ink said:
I'd far rather have an RS3. At least they sound great and look much more interesting, yet are still restrained (compared to the yobbo cars like Focus, Civic, etc).
At least £10k more and not as fun to drive...

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
Gregmitchell said:
for £230 a month find me a better new car.... didn't think so....
It's cheap for a reason.

Gregmitchell

1,745 posts

118 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
wormus said:
Gregmitchell said:
for £230 a month find me a better new car.... didn't think so....
It's cheap for a reason.
Reason being?

Selmer Mk6

245 posts

128 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
andrewparker said:
At least £10k more and not as fun to drive...
Carbuyer specced up an RS3 to about £50k! and I think a Golf R was faster than it round a track. Oh sorry, the RS3 is for the road only.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
Gregmitchell said:
Reason being?
The people who can afford to spend £30k on a car don't want a Golf. Weirdly, I can see plenty buying a new Focus.

andrewparker

8,014 posts

188 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
wormus said:
I'd be much more excited by the prospect of owing the new Focus RS.
It's the next car that has to beat the hype surrounding it. I hope for a lot of people round here that it is actually good!

alock

4,228 posts

212 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
MDUBZ said:
... and the understatedness has left many a 3 series driving sales rep bemused as it powers past.
I always find comments like this odd? How do you know what the other person is thinking? Are you just having a race with yourself and like to pretend someone else was racing you?

The original Nick the Greek

366 posts

101 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
Having driven the Golf R, it's a great car.

Second choice over my M135i. Just couldn't bring myself to drive a four cylinder car.

The R has been very successful, units wise, due to the bargain basement lease specials that VW has been putting on the road. Good news for those people who would have otherwise been driving a 1.6d.


andrewparker

8,014 posts

188 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
wormus said:
Gregmitchell said:
Reason being?
The people who can afford to spend £30k on a car don't want a Golf. Weirdly, I can see plenty buying a new Focus.
Of the five people I know who have an R (including myself), three own them. The R Forum is populated by people who in the majority own them. I get it, it doesn't appeal to you, but surely you accept that they do appeal to others?

Baryonyx

18,002 posts

160 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
It's undeniably fast but lacks drama and flair. A great technical accomplishment but I can see why enthusiasts may find them rather naff.

EricE

1,945 posts

130 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
I understand the appeal for people who lease/finance their car. I'd rather buy an 8V Audi S3 for my money.
Almost identical car but even more understated for the same price or (even cheaper where I live!) than the Golf.

k-ink

9,070 posts

180 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
EricE said:
I understand the appeal for people who lease/finance their car. I'd rather buy an 8V Audi S3 for my money.
Almost identical car but even more understated for the same price or (even cheaper where I live!) than the Golf.
I agree.

I am the sort who prefers to find a mint used bargain. When RS3 models can be found at 1/3 price with low miles I'd be very tempted. I am old school though, as I like owning things rather than renting forever. If they won't drop enough I'll be looking at other types of car instead. There are lots of fun things out there vying for attention. But if renting a golf r is your best bet, enjoy.

rog007

5,761 posts

225 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
Owned a MKII GTI 16V bought new and a MKV R32 bought nearly new; both wonderful cars and the draw to buy them was very strong. This version has had zero impact upon me, which I find quite intriguing.

V8A*ndy

3,695 posts

192 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
andrewparker said:
wormus said:
Gregmitchell said:
Reason being?
The people who can afford to spend £30k on a car don't want a Golf. Weirdly, I can see plenty buying a new Focus.
Of the five people I know who have an R (including myself), three own them. The R Forum is populated by people who in the majority own them. I get it, it doesn't appeal to you, but surely you accept that they do appeal to others?
What exactly do you mean by "own them" or do you simply mean they are not leased?





tumble dryer

2,022 posts

128 months

Tuesday 22nd December 2015
quotequote all
Coolbanana said:
I've owned several fast BMW's, a Porsche 911 and far more luxurious, higher-end vehicles but the R is proving to me to be a very much-enjoyed all-rounder that makes me want to drive it as much as any car I've had before.

Arriving very late in the game to VAG-ownership and unaware of what was going on in the lease-marketplace, I bought mine; outright. Based upon nostalgia from my teen years of long ago for the original GTI, Reviews and hype alone.

I reserved my hard-earned money this time around for a more sound financial investment in Property and went for a base-spec R thinking it seemed to have all the bits I actually use on a day-to-day basis - and I was right.
I like my toys but I can do without many that are simply extras and not really used much when I want to.

So the R is to me a bit of an eye-opener and somewhat of a revelation. You'd think VAG products were rubbish reading some folks comments on PH but, for me, the opposite is surely true if this little Golf is anything to go by. It is well put together and feels like a premium brand product. It is ergonomically functional, neat and tidy. It is a genuinely quick car and handles itself better in the wet than any vehicle I've owned previously.

Ok, so it is "bland". I'll concede that, but maybe I am too, so we are perfect for one another. If by "bland" we mean it doesn't scream 'Race Car, Boy Racer, Yobbo Mobile, Chav Chariot' then it certainly fits. It does, after all, only look 'slightly sporty'. While I appreciate cars like the Civic Type R, Subaru and Focus RS are good in their own way, they aren't for me on appearance alone. I'm not sure I would have wanted those looks on my driveway as a teenager either. Too Halfords I would have thought, even back then. Too 'trying too hard to be in your face sporty'. The AMG A45 falls into this category with its wing too.

I guess then, I like "bland". Others will like the RS etc and good for them - if they enjoy their choice as much as I enjoy mine, we're all happy.

"Soul". Hmmm. A tougher one. "Soul" often means different things to different people too. Quirks that can to some be annoying can be evidence of soul to others. Does the Golf R have soul then? To me...actually yes.

It's character isn't in the same vein as my BMW Z4M's was. That car was a hooligan; a lairy barnstormer. No, the Golf R's character to me is found in its willingness to be everything - to behave sedately and, dare I say, mundane, one minute but thrilling the next. Thrilling, of course, can only be soulful to some when it is forcing you to fight it, to be keeping you on the edge of your seat and challenging your skill-set. That's nice. Thrilling for me is demonstrating how accomplished the car is - making me nod to the Engineer's who made it and smiling at how good it is as I take a corner really, really fast.

Less skill and therefore less challenging, the latter. But then I'm not a car racer. I have never been to a Track and, truth be told, I have no ambition to either. Just not my thing. I do like to go around corners really quickly and accelerate quickly too. Simple likes. The Golf R provides those in all weathers, with aplomb and puts a smile on my face whilst doing so.




Edited by Coolbanana on Tuesday 22 December 18:11
Cracking post.