RE: Shed of the Week: MG ZS 180

RE: Shed of the Week: MG ZS 180

Author
Discussion

s m

23,240 posts

204 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
jl34 said:
Always thought the Mk2 saloon was a cracking car

Looks great

Credit to you

paulyv

1,020 posts

124 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Top Gear reviewed it well...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBkNYTNi1wQ

Edited by paulyv on Friday 15th January 12:10

B'stard Child

28,441 posts

247 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Amazed "Fast Eddy" has posted yet!!! I'll give him a nudge in the East Anglia area

B'stard Child

28,441 posts

247 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Oh it's not at all painful - nice friendly bunch in there......

I'll supply my own parrot

burritoNinja

690 posts

101 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
I have fond memories of my ZR. Was the 1.4L so was very slow but great on corners and was just fun to drive. The thing is still running but on its very last legs. Dare say current owner will have to scrap it within next year.
I got rid of the ZR to buy a ZT and must say, the ZT handles very well. I got the diesel so it is slow but great at crunching miles and very comfortable interior. Now getting rid of the ZT for my new Volvo but will miss her to an extent.
Dare say that MG could have been great if they had been nowhere near the old grandad Rover company. Shame they are now just bargain basement Chinese company.

Nick Young

250 posts

251 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Had one of these in lurid yellow, bought from new. Was a fantastic car to drive, sweet engine, comfortable driving position etc.

Only problem with it was the reliability. Spent half it's couple of years with us in the garage having things fixed (no exaggeration!). Oil pump being a particular problem. Bits regularly fell off. I still loved it when we got rid of it but needed rather more reliability that it offered.

A pre-hooned old one like this? Haggle a bit, buy it and just run it till it falls to pieces is my advice smile

marshall100

1,124 posts

202 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
burritoNinja said:
I have fond memories of my ZR. Was the 1.4L so was very slow but great on corners and was just fun to drive. The thing is still running but on its very last legs. Dare say current owner will have to scrap it within next year.
I got rid of the ZR to buy a ZT and must say, the ZT handles very well. I got the diesel so it is slow but great at crunching miles and very comfortable interior. Now getting rid of the ZT for my new Volvo but will miss her to an extent.
Dare say that MG could have been great if they had been nowhere near the old grandad Rover company. Shame they are now just bargain basement Chinese company.
I think there's 4 blokes that did quite well out of that image tbf.

samoht

5,732 posts

147 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Great article, and a solid shed pick IMO.

Yes it looks as exciting as a car park in Basingstoke, but Shed is all about making compromises - cars that are beautiful and quick and good-handling and robust don't generally go for a bag of sand!


TameRacingDriver

18,094 posts

273 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Thinking man's Accord Type-R or Primera GT IMO. In fact, I'd probably take this over the Primera, which did handle well but had a gutless, bland (if utterly reliable) engine. Whats all this about complaining about MPG? You wouldn't buy a V6 if you were bothered about that. I myself have jumped on the > 4 cylinder bandwagon while I still can. This looks to be one of the cheapest ways to do it. Similar age Mondeo's are probably turning into brown dust by now, and the less said about Vectra V6s the better (engine aside).

rtz62

3,370 posts

156 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Build quality of a chocolate teapot, and reliability of a cheap Japanese wristwatch.
Before I get shot down in flames, I've bought and sold a number of these and the ZT 190's, and to be honest they flatter to deceive.
Agreed, they are quite agile, but the engines invariably haven't had the cam let replaced or thr VIS motors sorted out due to the cost compared to the value of the vehicle; let's not forget that if you buy a £750 car then you don't want to spend £750 on a clutch, ca belts replacement and VIS motors.
Ah, the price.
If I say that the last ZT I bought was a 2003 car with sub-100k and I paid...£275 (no rust, no issues, drivers bolster worn)
And the last ZS 180? It was a last off the line 2005 car, 80k, and with the factory body kit and a stainless exhaust for £600
Sorry Mr Shed, but this car is waaaay too much money in my book

Hooli

32,278 posts

201 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
jl34 said:
Always thought the Mk2 saloon was a cracking car

T'is one of those in Donny owned by a PH'er. Much more sensible colour though.

Looks great.

Pickled

2,051 posts

144 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
MajorMajor76 said:
I'm sure I remember one of the motoring press at the time describing it as "as much fun as an M5" or something similar. Before I get flamed, I'm not suggesting it actually is and having never driven one I'd not be able to offer an opinion. Having owned Hondas of a similar vintage, though, I can believe what people are saying about the handling.
Jason Barlow on a TV prog. (might have been old Top Gear) stated he thought the ZT was two thirds of an M3.

Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Kitchski said:
Drawbacks? The ride is SHOCKING. I mean really, really bad. MGR couldn't produce a good ride and great handling.
Perhaps yours was broken or a previous owner had fitted stiffer springs? Mine had firm suspension, but it rode perfectly well, and the suspension was one of the best bits of the car.
Nope, wasn't broken. Just had a st ride. Had a 120 Atomix before that, and it was just as bad. Worse, probably, due to the reduced weight over the front end. Managed to improve the ride by carting 150kg of old car magazines in the boot for a couple of months in the 180. It was just over sprung, that was all. I've driven others (I sold them for a brief while many years ago) and they're all the same. Maybe our expectations are different?

Couldn't fault the handling/grip though. Very neutral, ultra forgiving yet not inert or boring. A great car to punt around in. Probably second only to the ZX 16v I used to have, in terms of handling. The only reason that was better was because it rode so much better, though the snappy back end was a bit tiring and less of a feature on the MG.

burritoNinja

690 posts

101 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Nick Young said:
Had one of these in lurid yellow, bought from new. Was a fantastic car to drive, sweet engine, comfortable driving position etc.

Only problem with it was the reliability. Spent half it's couple of years with us in the garage having things fixed (no exaggeration!). Oil pump being a particular problem. Bits regularly fell off. I still loved it when we got rid of it but needed rather more reliability that it offered.

A pre-hooned old one like this? Haggle a bit, buy it and just run it till it falls to pieces is my advice smile
Reliability was also a major issue for me with the ZR and ZT. I owned the ZT for about 6 weeks of nothing going wrong and then all the breakdowns started. Sunk over £2,000 into it in repairs/servicing in space of 6 months. Now gone 10 weeks with no issues but I don't trust the car one bit. Why we now got a lease car.

jamespink

1,218 posts

205 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
When oil was $100 a barel, fuel was £1.33 ishmad a litre. Now oil is sub $30 a barrel, fuel is still £1+. Discuss...

kambites

67,584 posts

222 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Fabulous things to drive; feels like a proper old-fashioned hot hatch and the KV6 is a lovely engine even if it's not particularly powerful.

Colour is pretty horrible, mind.

Nick Young

250 posts

251 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
jamespink said:
When oil was $100 a barel, fuel was £1.33 ishmad a litre. Now oil is sub $30 a barrel, fuel is still £1+. Discuss...
Not much to discuss really - fuel duty @ 58p per litre + VAT @ 20% = 70p going to the government before you even take into account the cost of the fuel.

xxxscimitarxxx

101 posts

188 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
And of you click on the add you will see at the bottom that there is similar miles Saab 2.0 turbo for £695.....yes its an auto but touting 185 bhp over the rovers 115bhp ....side by side test I think I might plump for the Saab

xxxscimitarxxx

101 posts

188 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
Nick Young said:
jamespink said:
When oil was $100 a barel, fuel was £1.33 ishmad a litre. Now oil is sub $30 a barrel, fuel is still £1+. Discuss...
Not much to discuss really - fuel duty @ 58p per litre + VAT @ 20% = 70p going to the government before you even take into account the cost of the fuel.
And because the UK is full of suckers who 'mustn't grumble' we accept that the petrol retailing side of the oil biz is now making great profits....that are not being passed onto us....still mustn't grumble eh!....cozwe never do....just sit and take what we are given like good little citizens.

TommoAE86

2,669 posts

128 months

Friday 15th January 2016
quotequote all
jl34 said:
Always thought the Mk2 saloon was a cracking car

Wow that is beautiful, lovely colour too! I couldn't get hold of a Saloon one with the V6 when I was looking so I got a ZT instead. Can't agree with the ruined suspension thing, the ZS' are meant to be slightly harder but the ZT was sublime and struck a good comfort/firm balance.

I'd buy another ZT if I had the need, but I'd get a 190+ and fit a 160 box smile