The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread Vol II
Discussion
Byker28i said:
Stickyfinger said:
Interesting, they obviously wanted to nick him with all the coppers around.I'd imagine it's driven by:
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
and
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 6th July 12:23
You can hear full chat bikes for miles around if it's decent weather on a Tuesday night, amazed there aren't more accidents and can't help but think its days are numbered as it's just too obvious to anyone with a pair of ears living within 10 miles of it that plenty are taking the piss. Shame as it was probably a good meet until too many idiots turned up.
Stickyfinger said:
Good on that copper sick of those chavvy s on those quads.The Wookie said:
Byker28i said:
Stickyfinger said:
Interesting, they obviously wanted to nick him with all the coppers around.I'd imagine it's driven by:
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
and
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
Byker28i said:
Stickyfinger said:
Interesting, they obviously wanted to nick him with all the coppers around.I'd imagine it's driven by:
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
and
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 6th July 12:23
The Wookie said:
Byker28i said:
Stickyfinger said:
Interesting, they obviously wanted to nick him with all the coppers around.I'd imagine it's driven by:
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
and
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 6th July 12:23
You can hear full chat bikes for miles around if it's decent weather on a Tuesday night, amazed there aren't more accidents and can't help but think its days are numbered as it's just too obvious to anyone with a pair of ears living within 10 miles of it that plenty are taking the piss. Shame as it was probably a good meet until too many idiots turned up.
There's always a decent police presence on hot days as they know it will be busy. Silly of that quad fella to try to scurry off like that when the police pulled up next to him.
https://www.facebook.com/MensHealthAU/videos/10157...
Sorry about Facebook link but WTF.
For a start driving a car with a headcam on? Breaking and swerving into a wall and rolling your car when there was room to pass.
Edited found YouTube link.
https://youtu.be/Jr0lCnpv4ds
Sorry about Facebook link but WTF.
For a start driving a car with a headcam on? Breaking and swerving into a wall and rolling your car when there was room to pass.
Edited found YouTube link.
https://youtu.be/Jr0lCnpv4ds
Edited by shambolic on Wednesday 6th July 16:58
shambolic said:
https://www.facebook.com/MensHealthAU/videos/10157...
Sorry about Facebook link but WTF.
For a start driving a car with a headcam on? Breaking and swerving into a wall and rolling your car when there was room to pass.
That's twice the driver has done that now.Sorry about Facebook link but WTF.
For a start driving a car with a headcam on? Breaking and swerving into a wall and rolling your car when there was room to pass.
ShaunTheSheep said:
blueg33 said:
4x4Tyke said:
Could have been really nasty, perhaps our HGV guys can explain if there is a way to handle this, get out of it. The road train driver doesn't seem to be going excessively quickly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AybNzLz4cxw
Drive to the conditions, have decent tyres. Looks to me as if speed was the main cause, back started to overtake the front. Bit like a spin in a car?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AybNzLz4cxw
Edited by 4x4Tyke on Wednesday 6th July 09:22
If you look at 10 seconds in, you can see that the back axle of the drag has been raised to improve turning circle. That means that it most likely unloaded and would lock up very easily on wet tarmac downhill.
Sort of driver, sort of speed and sort of one of those things IMHO.
The Wookie said:
Byker28i said:
Stickyfinger said:
Interesting, they obviously wanted to nick him with all the coppers around.I'd imagine it's driven by:
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
and
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news...
Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 6th July 12:23
You can hear full chat bikes for miles around if it's decent weather on a Tuesday night, amazed there aren't more accidents and can't help but think its days are numbered as it's just too obvious to anyone with a pair of ears living within 10 miles of it that plenty are taking the piss. Shame as it was probably a good meet until too many idiots turned up.
Turn up mob handed, block the roads and drag them all down the nick, then crush every single one of those bikes and quads.
Needs to be stopped.
Grrrr
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkbVE5u8yp4
[i]A motorist has been banned from driving after he was found guilty of causing a serious crash by driving without due care and attention.
Ryan Vincent, 33, from Holbury, tried to undertake a car on the A35 heading out of Southampton when he lost control of his car, resulting in a major crash that closed the road in both directions for hours.
Footage of the crash, from a dash cam, was shown in court and we are releasing it today to show just how serious the consequences can be if you do not drive with due care and attention at all times.
It was only sheer luck that nobody was seriously injured in this collision. It is not worth the risk.[/i]
[i]A motorist has been banned from driving after he was found guilty of causing a serious crash by driving without due care and attention.
Ryan Vincent, 33, from Holbury, tried to undertake a car on the A35 heading out of Southampton when he lost control of his car, resulting in a major crash that closed the road in both directions for hours.
Footage of the crash, from a dash cam, was shown in court and we are releasing it today to show just how serious the consequences can be if you do not drive with due care and attention at all times.
It was only sheer luck that nobody was seriously injured in this collision. It is not worth the risk.[/i]
Drive Blind said:
I'm in two minds about the Yaris v BMW incident.
Obviously the BMW can't be completely blameless but all the Yaris driver had to do was brake in a straight line which he couldn't manage.
Maybe the MoT history of the Yaris gives a clue:-Obviously the BMW can't be completely blameless but all the Yaris driver had to do was brake in a straight line which he couldn't manage.
26 March 2015: Pass, Advisory: Nearside front tyre worn close to the legal limit
14 April 2009: Fail: nearside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
and offside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
M4cruiser said:
Maybe the MoT history of the Yaris gives a clue:-
26 March 2015: Pass, Advisory: Nearside front tyre worn close to the legal limit
14 April 2009: Fail: nearside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
and offside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
Given the reaction and time to take do anything I would doubt that the driver could be held responsible for the condition of the tyres 15 months ago let alone 7 years ago. That said, I would not be surprised to find the tyres marked with "Ditch Finder"26 March 2015: Pass, Advisory: Nearside front tyre worn close to the legal limit
14 April 2009: Fail: nearside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
and offside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
Starfighter said:
M4cruiser said:
Maybe the MoT history of the Yaris gives a clue:-
26 March 2015: Pass, Advisory: Nearside front tyre worn close to the legal limit
14 April 2009: Fail: nearside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
and offside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
Given the reaction and time to take do anything I would doubt that the driver could be held responsible for the condition of the tyres 15 months ago let alone 7 years ago. That said, I would not be surprised to find the tyres marked with "Ditch Finder"26 March 2015: Pass, Advisory: Nearside front tyre worn close to the legal limit
14 April 2009: Fail: nearside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
and offside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
Starfighter said:
M4cruiser said:
Maybe the MoT history of the Yaris gives a clue:-
26 March 2015: Pass, Advisory: Nearside front tyre worn close to the legal limit
14 April 2009: Fail: nearside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
and offside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
Given the reaction and time to take do anything I would doubt that the driver could be held responsible for the condition of the tyres 15 months ago let alone 7 years ago. That said, I would not be surprised to find the tyres marked with "Ditch Finder"26 March 2015: Pass, Advisory: Nearside front tyre worn close to the legal limit
14 April 2009: Fail: nearside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
and offside front tyre tread depth below legal requirements
Vipers said:
Didn't find the vid that clear, (visually), so do I understand the Beema undertakes the Yaris, so I am wondering why he lost control?
beemer was overtaking another car coming up to a crest and couldnt see on coming cars. soon as he sees yaris instead of backing off he continues the overtake attempt and the yaris driver slams on the brakes and turns to the left??? which is how he ended up smacking into that wallVipers said:
Didn't find the vid that clear, (visually), so do I understand the Beema undertakes the Yaris, so I am wondering why he lost control?
The video is very clear, are you are attempting to view it using a pocket calculator from the 1970's? The BMW (Beema ) is on the wrong side of the road during an overtaking maneuver and rapidly heading toward the Yaris. Yaris driver brakes hard, locks up and the car veers to the right. I can only speculate but the driver probably tried to correct by steering toward the left backed of the brakes at the same time, causing it to snap back the other way.Edited by Mr2Mike on Thursday 7th July 14:29
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff