The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread Vol II
Discussion
Monkeylegend said:
Mr Snrub said:
Carried straight on across the lanes, don't think he even saw or heard me. Had a feeling he'd do something like that so was already backing off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdXggTznwTw
What a non event. I find it amazing that this sort of "st driving" gets posted on line, some people need to get a life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdXggTznwTw
The Spruce goose said:
Another driver who wants to passive aggressively police the roads by sitting in the right hand lane. Says he braked to avoid a collision.... bullst.The Spruce goose said:
Lovely engine sound though...GrumpyTwig said:
The Spruce goose said:
Another driver who wants to passive aggressively police the roads by sitting in the right hand lane. Says he braked to avoid a collision.... bullst.The Spruce goose said:
Cam car was in the right hand lane too long. Alucidnation said:
Monkeylegend said:
Mr Snrub said:
Carried straight on across the lanes, don't think he even saw or heard me. Had a feeling he'd do something like that so was already backing off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdXggTznwTw
What a non event. I find it amazing that this sort of "st driving" gets posted on line, some people need to get a life. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdXggTznwTw
Followed by pages and pages if inane arguments re who was right and who was wrong, complete with google earth maps, diagrams etc.
I love it
Edited to add, I have just seen somebody has posted the same thing re inane arguments of the knob thread
Edited by Monkeylegend on Monday 25th July 19:57
edo said:
GrumpyTwig said:
The Spruce goose said:
Another driver who wants to passive aggressively police the roads by sitting in the right hand lane. Says he braked to avoid a collision.... bullst.blueg33 said:
Cam car was in the right hand lane too long.
He wasn't really though, was he? There was a fairly consistent lane of traffic in the left hand lane and the camera car was doing a fair speed in excess of that lane - it's not like he was only gaining a miniscule amount on each vehicle in the left lane, nor were the gaps between (most) vehicles massive. The only gap that was really sensible for him to move into was the one after the van, after the Lambo had gone past. The Lambo driver wanted to press on, fair enough; he saw a gap and went for it, no drama, but the camera car was doing nothing wrong.blueg33 said:
Cam car was in the right hand lane too long.
Difficult call, but I'd disagree. Wide-angle cameras make the distances seem a lot greater. Also, Lambo went past at around 100MPH and was cutting into the cam cars line quite aggressively when the undertake was barely complete.
xRIEx said:
edo said:
GrumpyTwig said:
The Spruce goose said:
Another driver who wants to passive aggressively police the roads by sitting in the right hand lane. Says he braked to avoid a collision.... bullst.blueg33 said:
Cam car was in the right hand lane too long.
He wasn't really though, was he? There was a fairly consistent lane of traffic in the left hand lane and the camera car was doing a fair speed in excess of that lane - it's not like he was only gaining a miniscule amount on each vehicle in the left lane, nor were the gaps between (most) vehicles massive. The only gap that was really sensible for him to move into was the one after the van, after the Lambo had gone past. The Lambo driver wanted to press on, fair enough; he saw a gap and went for it, no drama, but the camera car was doing nothing wrong.But that's just me...
ORD said:
I think cammers are at fault (wholly or partly) in at least 50% of the clips in those compilations. Worrying that they all think they are in the right.
Do we think they drove this badly before they had the camera or is it the camera that makes them create a problem? I wonder if they are justifying the cost.Pete317 said:
xRIEx said:
edo said:
GrumpyTwig said:
The Spruce goose said:
Another driver who wants to passive aggressively police the roads by sitting in the right hand lane. Says he braked to avoid a collision.... bullst.blueg33 said:
Cam car was in the right hand lane too long.
He wasn't really though, was he? There was a fairly consistent lane of traffic in the left hand lane and the camera car was doing a fair speed in excess of that lane - it's not like he was only gaining a miniscule amount on each vehicle in the left lane, nor were the gaps between (most) vehicles massive. The only gap that was really sensible for him to move into was the one after the van, after the Lambo had gone past. The Lambo driver wanted to press on, fair enough; he saw a gap and went for it, no drama, but the camera car was doing nothing wrong.But that's just me...
ETA: watching it again, it's not clear whether the Lambo had only just encountered the camera car and took the opportunity available; there's nothing to suggest the Lambo had been waiting behind for any length of time.
Pete317 said:
Knowing there was a faster car behind me, I would have pulled into the gap which he was passing when the Lambo passed him.
But that's just me...
I suspect the Lambo closed on him pretty fast. Unless his mirror checks were very frequent it could have "appeared out of nowhere". But that's just me...
If there's something closing that rapidly I'd be very reluctant to make a sudden lane change anyway, in case they are daft enough to undertake...
Pistonheads loves Audi drivers right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zN5mZKdLU4
silentbrown said:
I suspect the Lambo closed on him pretty fast. Unless his mirror checks were very frequent it could have "appeared out of nowhere".
If there's something closing that rapidly I'd be very reluctant to make a sudden lane change anyway, in case they are daft enough to undertake...
I agree. No hugely strong evidence of poor driving. Slightly unfortunate for the bloke. I'd have been irritated with myself if I'd been caught out by that. Impossible to judge without a rear view.If there's something closing that rapidly I'd be very reluctant to make a sudden lane change anyway, in case they are daft enough to undertake...
GrumpyTwig said:
Pistonheads loves Audi drivers right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zN5mZKdLU4
Firstly skip the first 90% of the clip as it's a non eventAnd what's with "The speed limit's 30mph so I accelerate to 38mph just to 'get up to speed'"
GrumpyTwig said:
Pistonheads loves Audi drivers right? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zN5mZKdLU4
Weird, weird video.silentbrown said:
Pete317 said:
Knowing there was a faster car behind me, I would have pulled into the gap which he was passing when the Lambo passed him.
But that's just me...
I suspect the Lambo closed on him pretty fast. Unless his mirror checks were very frequent it could have "appeared out of nowhere". But that's just me...
If there's something closing that rapidly I'd be very reluctant to make a sudden lane change anyway, in case they are daft enough to undertake...
Besides, unless he was fortunate enough to encounter that gap at exactly the right moment, chances are good that he would have had to have slowed down behind - possibly for quite a while.
Pete317 said:
Perhaps, but the Lambo took the best part of 10 seconds to disappear from view ahead, so there's no reason to think that he would not have been visible behind for a similar amount of time.
Besides, unless he was fortunate enough to encounter that gap at exactly the right moment, chances are good that he would have had to have slowed down behind -possibly for quite a while.
Good point - that raises the question of how often you should check your mirrors! Obviously it depends on what you see in them, but... The only figure I found was someone saying "every 5 to 8 seconds is ideal". On that basis he could been checking 'ideally' and gone from (T-10) no Lambo to (T-2) one that's two seconds away from undertaking him.Besides, unless he was fortunate enough to encounter that gap at exactly the right moment, chances are good that he would have had to have slowed down behind -possibly for quite a while.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff