The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread Vol II

The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread Vol II

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

SonicShadow

2,452 posts

155 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
matchmaker said:
ambuletz said:
quite afew people there with the inability to stop at the line properly on a side road.'oops sorry. oh might aswell drive on like i have priority'. I've had many people who do this end up reversing back in shame when I've made eye contact with them.
Probably PH company directors - "look at me, last of the late brakers". wkers.
How is being a Director relevant to this? There seems to be a huge PH chip on shoulders about Directors. For 90% of the stuff on here its totally irrelevant, you may just as well say "window cleaners" or d"deep sea divers"
It's not all company directors, just the powerfully built ones.

Byker28i

60,029 posts

218 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
PoleDriver said:
Seems strange, wonder if the video doesn't show a huge pack blocking the road?

Alex_225

6,263 posts

202 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
I am staggered by the number of times that I have witnessed it first hand and how often it is captured, whereby a driver does something stupid, a car beeps and their immediate reaction is jab the brakes!

I recall fairly recently a guy in an SL Merc cut across me and my immediate reaction was to tap the horn. Not some prolonged beep but literally an 'I'm here' kind of beep. His reaction was immediately to jab the brakes and then follow it up with a middle finger. He's in the wrong, he's not checked his mirrors but instantly it's aggression.

There's got to be some psychological reason people do this as it's evident on dash cam footage all over the place.

Thing I've also had people do stupid things and immediately acknowledge they've made a mistake and put their hand up. Instantly diffuses frustration for me.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

119 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
I agree about the diffusing of frustration if someone just apologies.

I think it's pretty much human nature to abolish all personal responsibility.
In most situations rather than someone go, oops yeah, my bad, they will go "uuuuuuhhhhh no well....." - And that's face to face.

Shielded behind the little bubble of metal... the tough guy comes out.

Krikkit

26,535 posts

182 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Alex_225 said:
Thing I've also had people do stupid things and immediately acknowledge they've made a mistake and put their hand up. Instantly diffuses frustration for me.
Agreed completely - I try and do this whenever possible if making a mistake.

MarkRSi

5,782 posts

219 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Alex_225 said:
Thing I've also had people do stupid things and immediately acknowledge they've made a mistake and put their hand up. Instantly diffuses frustration for me.
Agreed completely - I try and do this whenever possible if making a mistake.
+1 common sense I'd have thought

blueg33

35,951 posts

225 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
SonicShadow said:
blueg33 said:
matchmaker said:
ambuletz said:
quite afew people there with the inability to stop at the line properly on a side road.'oops sorry. oh might aswell drive on like i have priority'. I've had many people who do this end up reversing back in shame when I've made eye contact with them.
Probably PH company directors - "look at me, last of the late brakers". wkers.
How is being a Director relevant to this? There seems to be a huge PH chip on shoulders about Directors. For 90% of the stuff on here its totally irrelevant, you may just as well say "window cleaners" or d"deep sea divers"
It's not all company directors, just the powerfully built ones.
Thats ok then. Certainly excludes me smile

Mr Snrub

24,986 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
ambuletz said:
what a strange person. There was plenty of room for them to overtake.
I think it was more the principle of highlighting the fact millions get spent on providing facilities for a demographic that then go unused by that demographic.
1) demand millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure
2) when millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure point out you aren't required to use it
3) ?
4) profit

heebeegeetee

28,776 posts

249 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Mr Snrub said:
xRIEx said:
ambuletz said:
what a strange person. There was plenty of room for them to overtake.
I think it was more the principle of highlighting the fact millions get spent on providing facilities for a demographic that then go unused by that demographic.
1) demand millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure
2) when millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure point out you aren't required to use it
3) ?
4) profit
No millions gets wasted on cycling infrastructure. We studiously ignore all the experience of our continental neighbours and build something totally different and useless, to continue to ensure that we absolutely have as many people in cars as possible.

mgv8

1,632 posts

272 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Mr Snrub said:
1) demand millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure
2) when millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure point out you aren't required to use it
3) ?
4) profit
The new routes in London are very well used, but are quite good. There are a lot out there that junk. One I used try and use cars can park in it, so do. The cars are fine but bike route is point less as just can not be used.

Goaty Bill 2

3,414 posts

120 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
mgv8 said:
The new routes in London are very well used, but are quite good. There are a lot out there that junk. One I used try and use cars can park in it, so do. The cars are fine but bike route is point less as just can not be used.
I have long held the opinion (not backed by any research I'm afraid), that Britain, or at least British cities were receiving money, either from Europe or central government for every mile of new cycle lane, up until a fairly recent point in time.

The number of painted on cycle lanes that one sees where there isn't room for two cars to pass, or as you have suggested, have cars allowed to be parked in them, is beyond absurd.
One rarely if ever sees this sort of nonsense in Denmark or the Netherlands.

You simply cannot take a 12 foot wide road, paint a new white line 3 feet from one curb (without parking restrictions) and say "look a new cycle lane!".
It is not fair to the cyclist nor the motorist; it invites frustration, anger and confrontation.


SonicShadow

2,452 posts

155 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Goaty Bill 2 said:
You simply cannot take a 12 foot wide road, paint a new white line 3 feet from one curb (without parking restrictions) and say "look a new cycle lane!".
It is not fair to the cyclist nor the motorist; it invites frustration, anger and confrontation.
Indeed. Add traffic islands into that as well and you have a choke point further limits an already restricted amount of space. Seen cyclists get squeezed by ignorant drivers at these points so many times.

feef

5,206 posts

184 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Mr Snrub said:
xRIEx said:
ambuletz said:
what a strange person. There was plenty of room for them to overtake.
I think it was more the principle of highlighting the fact millions get spent on providing facilities for a demographic that then go unused by that demographic.
1) demand millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure
2) when millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure point out you aren't required to use it
3) ?
4) profit
1) Demand money is spent on USEABLE cycling infrastructure
2) Build and paint some markings with a bicycle shaped symbol on it and consider it job done
3) wonder why cyclists aren't using the 'cycle paths'






xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
feef said:
Mr Snrub said:
xRIEx said:
ambuletz said:
what a strange person. There was plenty of room for them to overtake.
I think it was more the principle of highlighting the fact millions get spent on providing facilities for a demographic that then go unused by that demographic.
1) demand millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure
2) when millions is spent on a cycling infrastructure point out you aren't required to use it
3) ?
4) profit
1) Demand money is spent on USEABLE cycling infrastructure
2) Build and paint some markings with a bicycle shaped symbol on it and consider it job done
3) wonder why cyclists aren't using the 'cycle paths'




The incident in question:


The car evidently hasn't encountered any obstacles.

feef

5,206 posts

184 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
The incident in question:


The car evidently hasn't encountered any obstacles.
that's because, according to the article and reports, it's a path (ie footpath), not a cyclepath

xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
feef said:
xRIEx said:
The incident in question:


The car evidently hasn't encountered any obstacles.
that's because, according to the article and reports, it's a path (ie footpath), not a cyclepath
That's fair enough then.

Krikkit

26,535 posts

182 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Regardless, there are many good cycle paths which are ignored by cyclists simply through laziness or stubbornness.

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Regardless, there are many good cycle paths which are ignored by cyclists simply through laziness or stubbornness.
Cyclists lazy? rofl

Sorry, I'm just about to set off on an eighteen mile commute, that tickled me.

mattlad

261 posts

166 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
Cyclists lazy? rofl

Sorry, I'm just about to set off on an eighteen mile commute, that tickled me.
Well if you can't be bothered to get the car out........ Arf arf! biggrin

Stickyfinger

8,429 posts

106 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
feef said:
xRIEx said:
The incident in question:


The car evidently hasn't encountered any obstacles.
that's because, according to the article and reports, it's a path (ie footpath), not a cyclepath
And when has that ever bothered many Lycraistas ??

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED